<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE ArticleSet PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD PubMed 2.7//EN" "https://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/ncbi/pubmed/in/PubMed.dtd">
<ArticleSet>
<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>دانشگاه تهران</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>پژوهش های روستائی</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>2008-7373</Issn>
				<Volume>5</Volume>
				<Issue>2</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2014</Year>
					<Month>07</Month>
					<Day>23</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Clarification of the Relationship between
Diversification of Economic Activities and
Sustainable Rural Development
Case Study: Mashhad Township</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>تبیین رابطۀ تنوع‌بخشی فعالیت‌های اقتصادی و توسعۀ پایدار روستایی مطالعۀ موردی: شهرستان مشهد</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>237</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>262</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">52470</ELocationID>
			
<ELocationID EIdType="doi">10.22059/jrur.2014.52470</ELocationID>
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>مریم</FirstName>
					<LastName>قاسمی</LastName>
<Affiliation>‌استادیار جغرافیا و برنامه‌ریزی روستایی، دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد</Affiliation>
<Identifier Source="ORCID">0000-0002-0238-8323</Identifier>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>جعفر</FirstName>
					<LastName>جوان</LastName>
<Affiliation>‌استاد جغرافیا و برنامه‌ریزی روستایی، دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد</Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2013</Year>
					<Month>07</Month>
					<Day>06</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>Extended Abstract&lt;br /&gt;Introduction&lt;br /&gt;Investigating the economic structure of rural areas of the country particularly&lt;br /&gt;Mashhad has revealed that agriculture is the main factor for making a living, and&lt;br /&gt;that unfortunately in most of the development programs, it has been considered as&lt;br /&gt;the only and the most important economic factor in rural areas. Although this&lt;br /&gt;structure, given the limited economy of rural areas and their specific features, could&lt;br /&gt;work in the past, considering the expansion of the markets and their undeniable&lt;br /&gt;effect on rural spaces, and also considering many unsustainabilities in several&lt;br /&gt;natural, economic, and social dimensions, it can no longer guarantee sustainable&lt;br /&gt;residences and occupations in rural areas. Most of the scholars in the area of&lt;br /&gt;development have proposed the diversification approach within the framework of&lt;br /&gt;sustainable rural development. Based on this theory, diversity is a necessary factor&lt;br /&gt;for maintaining the sustainability of rural economy and development; it is suggested&lt;br /&gt;that following this approach will contribute to the stability sustainability of&lt;br /&gt;economic structures. Based on this theory, sustainability is created and maintained&lt;br /&gt;when a system has numerous and diverse elements; the more diverse a system is, the&lt;br /&gt;more ability it will have in reducing internal and external discrepancies. This will
* Responsible Author: magh30@um.ac.ir&lt;br /&gt;Rural Research Quarterly Vol. 5, No. 2, Summer 2014&lt;br /&gt;4&lt;br /&gt;result in sustainability, dynamicity, and stability during long periods and in different&lt;br /&gt;places not only against internal tensions but also when external challenges are faced.&lt;br /&gt;In addition to investigating level of sustainability in rural residences in Mashhad,&lt;br /&gt;this study aims to discover whether sustainable villages are the economically diverse&lt;br /&gt;ones. It also aims to find out what relationship exists between levels of sustainability&lt;br /&gt;and diversity of economic activities. The significance of this study first lies in the&lt;br /&gt;fact that it uses cluster analysis which can provide a new model for investigation of&lt;br /&gt;sustainability; second, it investigates sustainability in relation to diversification.&lt;br /&gt;Methodology&lt;br /&gt;The method of study is descriptive-analytic. The data needed in this study was&lt;br /&gt;collected using survey (Village and Family Questionnaire) and library research&lt;br /&gt;methods. The population under investigation in this study included the rural&lt;br /&gt;residences in Mashhad, and the unit of analysis was village. The sample size was&lt;br /&gt;determined in two levels for village and family using the Cochran formula. The&lt;br /&gt;number of sample villages and families was determined to be 34 and 350&lt;br /&gt;respectively. The sample villages were chosen using the stratified sampling method.&lt;br /&gt;To ensure the content validity of the questionnaire, the opinions of the scholars in&lt;br /&gt;the areas of geography and social sciences were used as the reference. In addition, to&lt;br /&gt;measure the reliability of the questionnaire, alpha Cronbach formula was used. In&lt;br /&gt;this study, the sustainability of rural residences was the dependent variable and the&lt;br /&gt;diversity of economic activities played the role of independent variable. To measure&lt;br /&gt;sustainability, several techniques exist which can be used differently based on the&lt;br /&gt;type of study. In the present study, cluster analysis is used to quantify sustainability&lt;br /&gt;and classify residences. The collected data were analyzed and interpreted using&lt;br /&gt;SPSS and Excel. Statistical tests used in the present study include cluster analysis,&lt;br /&gt;variance analysis with the Tukey test, and Pearson correlation.&lt;br /&gt;Data Analysis&lt;br /&gt;In the present study, to measure and assess sustainability, cluster analysis, which is&lt;br /&gt;statistical method to determine homogeneous clusters, was used. The created&lt;br /&gt;Rural Research Quarterly Vol. 5, No. 2, Summer 2014&lt;br /&gt;5&lt;br /&gt;clusters were labeled sustainable, semi-sustainable, and unsustainable based on the&lt;br /&gt;value of the sustainability index. The results of cluster analysis revealed that 9% of&lt;br /&gt;the villages under investigation were sustainable in economic, social, and&lt;br /&gt;environmental dimensions; 44% were semi-sustainable, and 47.1% were&lt;br /&gt;unsustainable. In fact, 91.2% of the sample villages were unsustainable or semisustainable.&lt;br /&gt;To compare the mean of the diversity of economic activities in&lt;br /&gt;sustainable, semi-sustainable, and unsustainable groups, Fischer method was used&lt;br /&gt;for conducting a unilateral variance analysis (F test). Since the level of significance&lt;br /&gt;for this test was less than 0.05, one can say that the mean of the diversity of&lt;br /&gt;economic activities for the three groups was not the same; in other words, there was&lt;br /&gt;a significant difference between the mean of the diversity of economic activities&lt;br /&gt;among these three groups. According to the results of HSD test, the mean of the&lt;br /&gt;diversity of economic activities in the unsustainable, semi-sustainable, and&lt;br /&gt;sustainable was 27.5, 30.7, and 38.6 respectively. These results determine the&lt;br /&gt;answer for the first research question in this study. In fact, sustainable and stable&lt;br /&gt;villages are those which enjoy higher levels of the diversity of economic activities.&lt;br /&gt;To investigate the relationship between levels of sustainability and diversification,&lt;br /&gt;Pearson correlation was used. The correlation coefficient found between the abovementioned&lt;br /&gt;variables (0.77) shows that there is a positive and direct relationship&lt;br /&gt;between them. In fact, the increase in the level of sustainability is accompanied by&lt;br /&gt;an increase in the diversity of economic activities. This shows that the sustainability&lt;br /&gt;of rural residences is deeply affected by the diversity of economic activities in an&lt;br /&gt;area. Therefore, the answer to the second research question is clear: more diversity&lt;br /&gt;in economic activities results in more sustainability in rural residences.&lt;br /&gt;Conclusion&lt;br /&gt;The results of the survey and theoretical investigations done in the present study&lt;br /&gt;show that the diversity of economic activities in rural areas meaningfully contributes&lt;br /&gt;to the sustainability of these areas. The results of the present study are consistent&lt;br /&gt;with those of the studies conducted in South Asia (Feldman, 1999), West Africa&lt;br /&gt;(Ackah &amp; Medvedev, 2010), and China (Liu et al., 2003). It can be argued that a&lt;br /&gt;Rural Research Quarterly Vol. 5, No. 2, Summer 2014&lt;br /&gt;6&lt;br /&gt;society with a diverse economy is more likely to become stable and sustainable. This&lt;br /&gt;issue has been considered by international organizations, developed countries, and&lt;br /&gt;some of the developing countries (China, India, Malaysia); and it is necessary to&lt;br /&gt;include this in the formulation of policies which are developed for rural areas in the&lt;br /&gt;country because simply continuing the current trend without any reforms and&lt;br /&gt;without paying attention to diversification will certainly result in the increase of&lt;br /&gt;unsustainability in rural residences.</Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA">ی
یکی از رویکردهای مهم توسعۀ پایدار روستایی «تنوع‌بخشی فعالیت‌های اقتصادی» است. تنوع، پیچیدگی ذاتی سیستم‌ها را افزایش می‌دهد و از این طریق فرایندهای درون آنها را تقویت می‌کند. مطالعۀ حاضر با روش توصیفی ـ تحلیلی به تبیین رابطۀ تنوع‌بخشی فعالیت‌های اقتصادی و پایداری سکونتگاه‌های روستایی شهرستان مشهد می‌پردازد. جمع‌آوری اطلاعات، مبتنی بر روش اسنادی و پیمایشی بود و نمونه‌گیری به‌روش طبقه‌ای تخصیص‌یافته صورت گرفت. با استفاده از تحلیل خوشه‌ای، سطوح پایداری سکونتگاه‌های روستایی در سه بعد اقتصادی، اجتماعی و زیست‌محیطی با 36 شاخص در مقیاس نسبی تعیین گردید. نتایج حاصل از 34 پرسشنامۀ آبادی و 350 پرسشنامۀ خانوار نشان می‌دهد که فقط 8/8 درصد سکونتگاه‌های روستایی بررسی‌شده، ازنظر ابعاد سه‌گانه پایدار بودند و 1/44 درصد آنها در گروه نیمه‌پایدار و 1/47 درصد در گروه ناپایدار قرار داشتند. بررسی نتایج حاصل از آزمون تحلیل واریانس یک‌طرفه نشان می‌دهد که میانگین نمرۀ تنوع فعالیت‌های اقتصادی در روستاهای پایدار 6/38، در روستاهای نیمه‌پایدار 7/30 و در روستاهای ناپایدار 5/27 است. به‌منظور بررسی دقیق‌تر رابطۀ بین پایداری و تنوع، از آزمون همبستگی پیرسون استفاده شد. بررسی‌ها نشان داد که رابطۀ بین پایداری و تنوع مستقیم و به‌میزان 77/0 بود، که ازنظر شدت قوی است. براساس مطالعة صورت‌گرفته، تنوع‌بخشی فعالیت‌های اقتصادی در نواحی روستایی می‌تواند پایداری سکونتگاه‌‌های روستایی را تقویت کند.</OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">اقتصاد روستایی</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">تنوع‌بخشی</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">توسعۀ پایدار</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">شهرستان مشهد</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://jrur.ut.ac.ir/article_52470_f381b8e26545093aa5f7b84545f0b400.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>
</ArticleSet>
