بررسی رضایتمندی باغداران نسبت به تسهیلات بلاعوض آبیاری قطره‌ای در شهرستان زنجان

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

گروه ترویج، ارتباطات و توسعه روستایی، دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشگاه زنجان، زنجان، ایران

چکیده

این تحقیق با هدف بررسی رضایتمندی باغداران از تسهیلات بلاعوض آبیاری قطره‌ای و عوامل مؤثر بر آن انجام‌شده است. رویکرد کلی تحقیق، کمّی به روش توصیفی - همبستگی می‌باشد. جامعه آماری تحقیق، باغداران استفاده‌کننده از تسهیلات بلاعوض آبیاری قطره‌ای در شهرستان زنجان بین سال‌های 1396 تا 1401 بودند (142=N)، که تعداد 104 نفر از آنان به روش تصادفی طبقه‌ای نمونه‌گیری شدند. ابزار گردآوری داده‌ها پرسشنامه بود، که برای بررسی روایی آن از دیدگاه صاحب‌نظران حوزه آب و اعتبارات کشاورزی استفاده شد. پایایی پرسشنامه با استفاده از پیش‌آزمون و محاسبه ضریب آلفای کرونباخ (966/0-919/0=α) تأیید شد. طبق نتایج، در مجموع رضایتمندی باغداران از تسهیلات بلاعوض آبیاری زیر متوسط (7/2) بود. نتایج مقایسه میزان رضایتمندی از تسهیلات بین گروه‌های مختلف از باغداران موردمطالعه برحسب «نوع مالکیت منبع آب»، «سابقه شرکت در دوره‌های آموزشی آبیاری تحت‌فشار»، «موقعیت مکانی باغ»، «نوع مالکیت باغ»، «محل سکونت»، «زمینه شغل اصلی» و «عضویت در تشکل‌ها» تفاوت معنی‌داری نشان داد. طبق نتایج همبستگی، بین میزان رضایتمندی از تسهیلات با متغیرهای «قدمت باغ»، «مساحت باغ»، «سطح اجرای آبیاری قطره‌ای در باغ» رابطه منفی و معنی‌دار و با متغیرهای «سابقه استفاده از آبیاری تحت‌فشار»، «ویژگی‌های اجتماعی- ارتباطی» و «ویژگی‌های آموزشی- اطلاعاتی» رابطه مثبت و معنی‌دار وجود داشت. همچنین بر اساس نتایج تحلیل رگرسیونی (35/0= R2adj)، به ترتیب چهار متغیر «ویژگی‌های آموزشی- اطلاعاتی»، «مزیت کاهش هزینه‌های تولید و بهبود راندمان منابع تولید»، «مساحت باغ» و «مزیت بهبود مدیریت زمان و مصرف آب آبیاری» به میزان 35 درصد از تغییرات متغیر رضایتمندی باغداران از تسهیلات را تبیین می‌کنند.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله [English]

Investigating Gardeners' Satisfaction with Drip Irrigation Facilities in Zanjan County

نویسندگان [English]

  • Gholamreza Mojarradi
  • Kolsoum Hamidi
  • Amir Naeimi
  • Leila Zabiheian
Department of Extension, Communication and Rural Development, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Zanjan, Zanjan, Iran
چکیده [English]

A B S T R A C T
This study was conducted to investigate gardeners' satisfaction with irrigation facilities and the factors that affect it. The general approach of this research is quantitative, using a descriptive-correlation method. The statistical population included gardeners who had received facilities for drip irrigation in Zanjan County, of which 104 were sampled using the stratified random method. The data collection tool was a questionnaire. Water and agricultural credit experts confirmed the questionnaire's validity and reliability were approved using Cronbach's alpha coefficient (α=0.919-0.966). Based on the results, gardeners’ overall satisfaction with the process of irrigation facilities was below average (2.7). The results of the comparison of the level of satisfaction between different groups of gardeners in terms of water source ownership, experience of participating in new irrigation training courses, location of the garden, type of ownership of the garden, place of residence, field of main occupation, and membership in organizations showed significant differences. According to the correlation results, there was a negative and significant relationship between satisfaction level and garden age, garden area, and drip irrigation area, and there was a positive and significant relationship with the history of using pressurized irrigation, social-communicative characteristics, and educational-informational characteristics. Furthermore, based on the results of the regression analysis (R2adj=0.35), the four variables, including educational-informational features, the benefit of reducing production costs and improving the efficiency of production resources, garden area, and the benefit of improving time management and irrigation water consumption, explain 35% of the variation in gardeners' satisfaction with facilities.
Extended Abstract
Introduction
Recently, due to the necessity of optimal utilization of water resources in agriculture, drip irrigation systems, which are the most efficient irrigation methods, have been of great importance. Iran’s government considers special facilities to develop these technologies annually. Despite the supportive programs, the operation of new irrigation systems is relatively low. This can be caused by problems that occur while receiving facilities. The awareness of client satisfaction is undoubtedly an essential aspect of the development and continuation of new technology in agriculture. This research was conducted to investigate the factors affecting the gardeners' satisfaction with government grants for the implementation of drip irrigation systems in gardens.
 
Methodology
This study is based on a quantitative survey with a descriptive-correlation method. The statistical population included 142 gardeners who had received facilities for drip irrigation from 2017 to 2023 in Zanjan County of Zanjan Province in Northwest of Iran. Based on Krejcie and Morgan’s table and using stratified random sampling technique, 104 gardners were selected as the study sample. The data collection tool was a questionnaire. The validity of the questionnaire was reviewed by a group of faculty members, specialists, and experts in water and agricultural credit. A pre-test was used to assess the reliability of the questionnaire. Cronbach's alpha coefficient was also calculated for different questionnaire parts (α=0.919 - 0.966).
 
Results and discussion
According to the results, the overall satisfaction of the studied gardeners with the process of drip irrigation facility was below average (2.7). The results of grouping gardeners based on the level of satisfaction were 40.3% (relatively satisfied), 30.8% (relatively dissatisfied), 15.4% (dissatisfied) and 13.5% (satisfied). The results of the comparison of the level of satisfaction with the facility between different groups of studied gardeners in terms of water source ownership, the experience of participating in new irrigation training courses, location of the garden, and type of ownership of the garden, place of residence, field of main occupation, and membership in organizations showed significant differences. In other words, Gardeners who have experience participating in training courses related to new irrigation systems, the type of ownership of their garden is private, and the type of ownership of the water source of their garden is shared, their main occupation is agriculture, their residency place is the village, and those who are members of social and rural organizations; are more satisfied than others. Correlation results indicate that there is a significant negative relationship between the satisfaction level and garden age, garden area, and drip irrigation area, and there is also a significant positive relationship between satisfaction and the history of using pressurized irrigation, social-communicative characteristics, and educational-informational characteristics. The results of categorizing the benefits of using drip irrigation in gardens with exploratory factor analysis led to the identification of three categories of benefits as reducing production costs and improving the efficiency of using production resources, quantitative and qualitative improvement of production and increasing income, and improved time management and irrigation water consumption; that these factors explained 75.81% of the total variance. Based on the results of the results of the regression analysis (R2adj=0.35), the four variables, including educational-informational features, the advantage of reducing production costs and improving the efficiency of production resources, garden area, and the advantage of improving time management and irrigation water consumption, explain 35% of the variation in gardeners' satisfaction with facilities.
In line with the results of this research, Charmchian Langerodi & Janbaz (2018) and Chovatia et al. (2019) show that gardeners are less satisfied with the time of receiving facilities and installing the irrigation system. In addition to the study of Hoseinpour et al. (2023), the users of the drip irrigation system have expressed dissatisfaction with the low quality and high cost of the equipment, the administrative bureaucracy, and the complex process of obtaining facilities. In accordance with Charmchian Langerodi and Janbaz's (2018) findings, for gardeners, the benefits of using pressurized irrigation systems, such as the decrease in labor costs, are more important than the increase in production and income. Charmchian Langerodi and Janbaz (2018) also showed that educational and promotional factors explain the gardeners' satisfaction with irrigation facilities. Furthermore, the study of Aazami et al. (2011) showed that the economic characteristics of farmers such as land ownership status affected the level of satisfaction of users of pressurized irrigation systems through facilities. So that people whose land was under private ownership were more satisfied.
 
Conclusion
Considering the results of the study of the personal, occupational, social-communicational, educational-informational characteristics of gardeners, as well as their perception of the benefits of using drip irrigation systems and examining the relationship and impact of these variables on their satisfaction with these facilities, a general view of the current situation in terms of satisfaction with the process of this type of facility was obtained. These results, in line with the assessments of the modern irrigation systems development plan at the macro level, can contribute to the flexibility and modification of future implementation guidelines of this plan conforming with the regional conditions and the characteristics of the facility applicants and accelerate the trend of developing modern irrigation systems aligned with the upstream documents.
 
Funding
There is no funding support.
 
 
Authors’ Contribution
All of the authors approved the content of the manuscript and agreed on all aspects of the work declaration of competing interest none.
 
Conflict of Interest
Authors declared no conflict of interest.
 
Acknowledgments
We are grateful to all the scientific consultants of this paper.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • New Irrigation
  • Drip Irrigation
  • Facilities
  • Satisfaction
  • Water Resource Management
  1. اعظمی، امیر؛ زرافشانی، کیومرث؛ دهقانی سانیچ، حسین و گرجی، علی. (1390). تحلیل رضایتمندی کشاورزان از اجرای سیستم‌های آبیاری تحت‌فشار در استان کرمانشاه. نشریه آب‌وخاک (علوم و صنایع کشاورزی). 25(4)، 845-853. doi: 10.22067/jsw.v0i0.10244
  2. تقی‌پور جاوی، علی؛ صیدایی، سید اسکندر و بریمانی، فرامرز (1399). افت منابع آب زیرزمینی و تأثیر آن بر ساختار کالبدی نواحی روستایی (موردمطالعه: سکونتگاه‌های روستایی شهرستان لردگان). فصلنامه پژوهش‌های روستایی، 11(1)، 189-170. doi: 10.22059/jrur.2019.287337.1392
  3. چرمچیان لنگرودی، مهدی و جانباز، علیرضا. (1397). تحلیل رضایت باغداران از اعتبارات بانکی آبیاری تحت‌فشار در شهرستان قائم‌شهر. اقتصاد فضا و توسعه روستایی. 7(24)، 127-144.
  4. حسین‌پور، باقر؛ جباری، آناهیتا و علیپور، حسن. (1402). بررسی و تحلیل چالش‌های پذیرش و گسترش آبیاری قطره‌ای در باغ‌های سیب ارومیه با استفاده از مدل نوآوری راجرز. نشریه پژوهش آب در کشاورزی، 37(1)، 72-49. doi: 10.22092/jwra.2023.360564.955
  5. سازمان مدیریت و برنامه‌ریزی استان زنجان (1402). سالنامه آماری استان زنجان سال 1400.
  6. سالارپور، ماشاا..؛ داورپناه، مجتبی و زارع، قدسیه. (1400). بررسی عوامل مؤثر بر پذیرش فناوری‌های نوین آبیاری در بین کشاورزان منطقه سیستان. نشریه آب و توسعه پایدار. 8(4)، 32-23. doi:10.22067/jwsd.v8i4.2107.1064
  7. سپهوند، فاطمه؛ نادری مهدیی، کریم؛ غلامرضایی، سعید و بیژنی، مسعود. (1401). کاربست آینده‌نگاری در مدیریت پایدار منابع آب زیرزمینی در بخش کشاورزی حوضه کرخه علیا. فصلنامه پژوهش‌های روستایی، 13(4)، 669-650. doi: 10.22059/jrur.2022.346569.1762
  8. ظریفیان، شاپور؛ رستمی، جواد و پیش‌بهار، اسماعیل. (1399). عوامل مؤثر در به‌کارگیری سیستم‌های نوین آبیاری در توسعه کشاورزی پایدار (مطالعه موردی: شهرستان بستان‌آباد، استان آذربایجان شرقی). نشریه دانش کشاورزی و تولیدات پایدار. 30(3)، 217-229. dor: 20.1001.1.24764310.1399.30.3.13.8
  9. علیمردانی، علی؛ کشاورز، مرضیه؛ کرمی، رؤیا و ابراهیمی، محمدعلی. (1399). ارزیابی اولویت و اثربخشی راهبردهای ارتقای بهره‌وری آب و توسعه همه‌جانبه بخش کشاورزی در برنامه‌های توسعه: مطالعه موردی استان قزوین. اقتصاد کشاورزی و توسعه. 28(4)، 91-59. doi: 10.30490/aead.2021.342671.1227
  10. فرج‌اله حسینی، سید جمال و ده‌یوری، سحر. (1391). بررسی عوامل تأثیرگذار بر استفاده از اعتبارات بانکی در طرح‌های آبیاری تحت‌فشار در استان اصفهان.  مجله پژوهش‌های ترویج و آموزش کشاورزی، 5 (1)، 27-15.
  11. فرح‌زا، محمد نوید و نظری، بیژن. (1399). واکاوی نیازهای آموزشی کشاورزان دارای سامانه آبیاری سطحی در راستای بهبود بهره‌وری آب (مطالعه موردی: استان قزوین). نشریه آبیاری و زهکشی ایران. 14(2)، 425- 414. dor: 20.1001.1.20087942.1399.14.2.6.1
  12. کورکی‌نژاد، ژاله. (1400). کارایی فنی آب و تعیین عوامل مؤثر بر پذیرش تکنولوژی نوین آبیاری با تأکید بر نقش سرمایه اجتماعی (تولیدکنندگان پسته شهرستان سیرجان). مجله تحقیقات اقتصاد و توسعه کشاورزی ایران، 52(3)، 523-507. doi: 10.22059/ijaedr.2021.311351.668958
  13. کیانی، علیرضا و شاکر، مجتبی. (1398). تحلیلی بر مشکلات و موانع توسعه آبیاری تحت‌فشار. نشریه مدیریت آب در کشاورزی. 6(1)، 74-65.
  14. کیانی، علیرضا و شاکر، مجتبی. (1400). بررسی اثربخشی سامانه‌های نوین آبیاری تحت‌فشار ایران. نشریه مدیریت آب در کشاورزی، 8 (2)، 182-167. dor: 20.1001.1.24764531.1400.8.2.13.9
  15. محمدی، نریمان؛ محتشمی، تکتم و کرباسی، علیرضا. (1397). عوامل مؤثر بر توسعه سیستم‌های آبیاری تحت‌فشار در منطقه تربت‌حیدریه از دیدگاه کارشناسان. نشریه علوم ترویج و آموزش کشاورزی ایران، 14(1)، 35-23.
  16. مختاری حصاری، آرزو؛ رضایی، روح‌اله و شعبانعلی فمی، حسین. (1398). نظر کارشناسان جهاد کشاورزی آذربایجان شرقی نسبت به مشکلات به‌کارگیری سامانه آبیاری کم‌فشار توسط بهره‌برداران. نشریه پژوهش مدیریت آموزش کشاورزی، 11(50)، 90-74. doi: 10.22092/jaear.2019.127371.1638
  17. مرکز پژوهش‌های مجلس شورای اسلامی (1396). قانون برنامه پنج‌ساله ششم توسعه اقتصادی، اجتماعی و فرهنگی جمهوری اسلامی ایران (1400-1396).
  18. وزارت جهاد کشاورزی (1400). دستورالعمل اجرائی طرح توسعه سامانه‌های نوین آبیاری. شماره: 1729/605/1400، تهران: وزارت جهاد کشاورزی.
  19. وزارت جهاد کشاورزی (1401). گزارش طرح توسعه سامانه‌های نوین آبیاری کشور. تهران: وزارت جهاد کشاورزی
  20. Aggelopoulos, S., Mamalis, S., and Soutsas, K. (2011). Farmers' satisfaction with agricultural credit: The case of Greece. Food Economics-Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica, Section C8(4), 233-242. doi: 10.1080/16507541.2012.678050
  21. Alimardani, A., Keshavarz, M., Karami, R., & Ebrahimi, M. A. (2021). Assessing the priority and effectiveness of strategies to water productivity promotion and comprehensive development of agricultural sector in development programs: a case study of Qazvin province of Iran. Agricultural Economics and Development28(4), 59-91. doi: 10.30490/aead.2021.342671.1227 [In Persian].
  22. Aazami, A., Zarafshani, K., Dehghanisanij, H., & Gorji, A. (2011). Determine Farmers’ Satisfaction Towards Pressurized Irrigation Systems in Kermanshah Province. Water and Soil25(4), 845-853. [In Persian]. doi: 10.22067/jsw.v0i0.10244
  23. Charmchian Langerodi, M. & Janbaz, A. (2018). Analysis of gardeners' satisfaction with pressure irrigation bank credits in Qaemshahr city. Journal of Space Economy & Rural Development, 7(24), 127-144. [In Persian].
  24. Chovatia, J. V., Savaliya, V. M., Sindhi, S. J., Gorfad, P. S., & Kalsariya, B. N. (2019). Constraints confronted by the cotton growers of Saurashtra region in adoption of drip irrigation system (DIS). Journal of Pharmacognosy and phytochemistry8(5), 365-367.
  25. Farahza, N., & Nazari, B. (2020). Analysis of educational needs of Farmers with surface irrigation system to improve water productivity (Case study: Qazvin province). Iranian Journal of Irrigation & Drainage14(2), 414-425. dor: 20.1001.1.20087942.1399.14.2.6.1 [In Persian].
  26. Greenland, S. J., Dalrymple, J., Levin, E., & O’Mahony, B. (2018). Improving agricultural water sustainability: Strategies for effective farm water management and encouraging the uptake of drip irrigation. The goals of sustainable development: Responsibility and governance, 111-123. doi: 10.1007/978-981-10-5047-3_7
  27. Guo, H., & Jiang, Y. (2011). Analysis on the influencing factors of farmers' satisfaction to vouchers-base on FAO Post-earthquake Assistance Program in Sichuan, China. Journal of Agricultural Science (Toronto)3(3), 211-216. doi: 10.5539/jas.v3n3p211
  28. Hoseinpour, B., Jabbari, A., & Alipour, H. (2023). Evaluation and Assessment of Drip Irrigation Acceptance and Development Challenges in Urmia Apple Orchards Using Rogers’ Diffusion of Innovation Model. Journal of Water Research in Agriculture37(1), 49-72. doi: 10.22092/jwra.2023.360564.955 [In Persian].
  29. Hosseini, S. J. F., & Dehyouri, S. (2012). Examining The Affective Factors in Utilization of Bank Credits in Under Pressure Irrigation Projects in Isfahan Province. Journal of Agricultural Extension and Education Research, 5(1), 15-27. [In Persian].
  30. Kaarthikeyan, G. M., & Suresh, A. (2019). A study on understanding the adoption of water saving technology: A case study of drip irrigation. Int. J. Recent Technol. Eng, 7(6), 1123-1130.
  31. Kiani, A. & Shaker, M. (2022). Evaluating the Effectiveness of Pressurized Irrigation Systems in Iran. Water Management in Agriculture, 8(2), 167-182. dor: 20.1001.1.24764531.1400.8.2.13.9 [In Persian].
  32. Kiani, A. & Shaker, M. (2019). An Analyses of the Problems and Barriers to Development Pressurized Irrigation Systems. Water Management in Agriculture6(1), 65-74. [In Persian].
  33. Koech, R., Haase, M., Grima, B., & Taylor, B. (2021). Barriers and measures to improve adoption of irrigation technologies: A case study from the Bundaberg region in Queensland, Australia. Irrigation and Drainage, 70(4), 909-923. doi: 10.1002/ird.2583
  34. Koorkinejad, J. (2021). Technical efficiency of water and determining the factors affecting adoption of new irrigation technology, with emphasis on the role of social capital (Pistachio producers in Sirjan). Iranian Journal of Agricultural Economics & Development Research (IJAEDR)52(3), 507-523. doi: 10.22059/ijaedr.2021.311351.668958 [In Persian].
  35. Kouadio, Y. D., Anani, A. N. B., Faye, B., and Fan, Y. (2023). Determinants Influencing Cocoa Farmers’ Satisfaction with Input Credit in the Nawa Region of Côte d’Ivoire. Sustainability15(14), 10981. doi: 10.3390/su151410981
  36. Le, Q. B., & Dhehibi, B. (2019). A typology-based approach for assessing qualities and determinants of adoption of sustainable water use technologies in coping with context diversity: The case of mechanized raised-bed technology in Egypt. Sustainability, 11(19), 5428. doi: 10.3390/su11195428
  37. Li, P., Wang, D., Li, W., & Liu, L. (2022). Sustainable water resources development and management in large river basins: an introduction. Environmental Earth Sciences, 81(6), 179. doi: 10.1007/s12665-022-10298-9
  38. Lualhati, G. P., Manalo, G. V., Manalo, J. M., & Ramos, J. A. (2018). Satisfaction of Filipino Crop Farmers on Agricultural Credit. International Journal of Applied Science1(2), p21. doi: 10.30560/ijas.v1n2p21
  39. Management and Planning Organization of Zanjan (2023). Statistical Yearbook 2021, Zanjan Province. [In Persian].
  40. Mente, N. (2021). Factors affecting irrigation management decision-making: the case of Taung Irrigation Scheme in North West Province of South Africa (Doctoral dissertation, University of Pretoria).
  41. Ministry of Agriculture - Jahad (2021). Implementation guidelines for the development of new irrigation systems. No. 1400/605/1729. [In Persian].
  42. Ministry of Agriculture - Jahad (2022). Report on the development plan of modern irrigation systems in the country. Published: Spring 2022. [In Persian].
  43. Mohammadi, N., Mohtashami, T., & Karbasi, A. (2018). Factors affecting experts' viewpoint towards development of pressurized irrigation systems in Torbat Heydarieh region. Iranian Agricultural Extension and Education Journal, 14(1), 23-35. [In Persian].
  44. Mokhtari Hesari, A., Rezaei, R., & Shabanali Fami, H. (2019). Viewpoint of Experts of East Azarbaijan Agriculture Jihad on Problems of Using Low Pressure Irrigation System by Users. Journal of Agricultural Education Administration Research11(50), 74-90. doi: 10.22092/jaear.2019.127371.1638 [In Persian].
  45. Nazari, B., Liaghat, A., Akbari, M. R., & Keshavarz, M. (2018). Irrigation water management in Iran: Implications for water use efficiency improvement. Agricultural water management208, 7-18. doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2018.06.003
  46. Parliament Research Center (2017). Sixth Five-Year Development Plan (2016-2021). [In Persian].
  47. Salarpour, M., Davarpanah, M., & Zare, G. (2022). Investigating the effective factors on the acceptance of new irrigation technologies among farmers in Sistan region. Journal of Water and Sustainable Development, 8(4), 23-32 doi: 10.22067/jwsd.v8i4.2107.1064. [In Persian].
  48. Sepahvand, F., Naderi Mahdei, K., Gholamrezai, S., & Bijani, M. (2023). The Use of Foresight in the Sustainable Management of Water Resources in the Agricultural Sector of the Karkheh-Olia Basin. Journal of Rural Research, 13(4), 650-669. doi: 10.22059/jrur.2022.346569.1762 [In Persian].
  49. Serote, B., Mokgehle, S., Senyolo, G., du Plooy, C., Hlophe-Ginindza, S., Mpandeli, S., Nhamo, L., & Araya, H. (2023). Exploring the barriers to the adoption of climate-smart irrigation technologies for sustainable crop productivity by smallholder farmers: Evidence from South Africa. Agriculture, 13(2), 246. doi: 10.3390/agriculture13020246
  50. Singh, H., & Sekhon, M. K. (2005). Cash-in benefits of the Kisan Credit Card Scheme: onus is upon the farmer. Indian Journal of Agricultural Economics60(3), 319-334.
  51. Taghipoor Javi, A., Seydaei, S. E., & Barimani, F. (2020). Groundwater Resources Drawdown and Its Effect on the Physical Structure of Rural Areas: A Case Study of Rural Settlements of Lordegan. Journal of Rural Research, 11(1), 170-189. doi: 10.22059/jrur.2019.287337.1392 [In Persian].
  52. Yatribi, T. (2020). Factors influencing adoption of new irrigation technologies on farms in Morocco: Application of logit model. International Journal of Environmental and Agriculture Research6(11), 42-51
  53. Zarifian, S., Rostami, J., & Pishbahar, E. (2020). Factors affecting the use of modern irrigation systems for Sustainable Agricultural Development (Case Study: Rural Areas of Bostan Abad City of East-Azerbayjan Province-Iran). Journal of Agricultural Science and Sustainable Production30(3), 217-229. dor: 20.1001.1.24764310.1399.30.3.13.8 [In Persian].