رهیافتی بر موضوع کشاورزی هوشمند متمرکز بر پژوهش‌های علمی در پایگاه اسکوپوس

نوع مقاله : مقاله برگرفته از پایان نامه

نویسندگان

گروه آموزشی جغرافیای انسانی، دانشکده علوم جغرافیایی، دانشگاه خوارزمی تهران، ایران

چکیده

در مناطق روستایی کشورمان و در حوزه کشاورزی، محدودیت‌های زیادی وجود دارد. محدودیت‌هایی که می‌تواند تأثیرات مخربی بر زندگی و فعالیت کشاورزان در مناطق روستایی برجای بگذارد. این در حالی است که دیگر روش‌های سنتی، برای تأمین منابع غذایی در جامعه نیز کارایی ندارند. بنابراین امروزه در حال تجربه تحول جدیدی در بخش کشاورزی هستیم که «کشاورزی هوشمند» نامیده می‌شود. پژوهش به بررسی پژوهش‌های علمی در زمینه کشاورزی هوشمند برای شناخت جایگاه علمی این موضوع و با جمع‌آوری اطلاعات از پایگاه Scopus پرداخت. در این مطالعه، پژوهش‌های انجام‌شده در دوره زمانی 1997-2024 موردبررسی قرار گرفت. برای تحلیل داده‌ها از کتابخانه بیبلیومتریکس در محیط برنامه‌نویسی R و از برنامه Vosviewer استفاده گردید. پس از پذیرش رویکرد «توسعه پایدار»، اکنون کشاورزی هوشمند بنا بر چالش‌های امنیت غذایی، وقوع رخدادهای طبیعی و گرمایش زمین که فعالیت‌های کشاورزی و تأمین پایدار غذا را با چالش روبه‌رو ساخته، پدیدار گشته است. این موضوع اشاره به استفاده از فناوری اطلاعات و ارتباطات در فعالیت‌های کشاورزی دارد. بر اساس نتایج؛ بیشترین تحقیقات در این زمینه توسط کشورهای هند، چین و آمریکا انجام‌شده و اتحادیه اروپا و بنیاد ملی علوم طبیعی چین مهم‌ترین حامیان در جهت تأمین هزینه‌ها برای گسترش زمینه‌های علمی کشاورزی هوشمند هستند. با اقتباس از نتایج پژوهش و اینکه در سال‌های اخیر پژوهش‌های علمی در مناطق روستایی کشورمان در حال ارائه رویکرد «روستای هوشمند» هستند؛ کشاورزی هوشمند می‌تواند به‌عنوان یک بخش در ذیل این موضوع موردتوجه قرار بگیرد. این پژوهش همچنین خواستار حمایت مداوم از سیاست‌ها و افزایش سرمایه‌گذاری در زمینه تحقیقات کشاورزی هوشمند در کشورمان است.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله [English]

An Approach To Subject Smart Agriculture Focused on Scientific Research in the SCOPUS Database

نویسندگان [English]

  • Saeid Nasire Zare
  • Vahid Riahi
  • Hassan Afrakhteh
Department of Human Geography, Faculty of Geographical Sciences, Khurazmi University, Tehran, Iran
چکیده [English]

A B S T R A C T
There are many restrictions in the rural areas of our country and the field of agriculture, which can destroy the lives and activities of farmers in rural areas. Meanwhile, other traditional methods are ineffective in providing food resources in society. Therefore, today, we are experiencing a new development in the agricultural sector called "smart agriculture." The research examined the scientific studies in the field of smart agriculture to know the scientific status of this subject by collecting information from the Scopus database. This research examined the studies conducted in the period (1997- 2024). The Bibliometrics library in the R programming environment and the Vosviewer program were used for data analysis. After accepting the "sustainable development" approach, smart agriculture has emerged due to the challenges of food security, natural events, and global warming, which have challenged agricultural activities and sustainable food supply. This issue refers to using information and communication technology in agricultural activities. Based on the results, most of the research in this field has been carried out by India, China, and the United States, and the European Union and the National Natural Science Foundation of China are the most important supporters in the direction of funding for the expansion of the scientific fields of smart agriculture. By adapting the research results shown in recent years, scientific researchers in the rural areas of our country are presenting the "smart village" approach, and smart agriculture can be considered a sector under this topic. This research also calls for continued support for policies and increased investment in smart agriculture research in our country.
Extended Abstract
Introduction
There are many restrictions in the rural areas of our country and in the field of agriculture, which can have destructive effects on the lives and activities of farmers in rural areas. Meanwhile, other traditional methods are not effective in providing food resources in society. Therefore, today, we are experiencing a new development in the agricultural sector called "Smart Agriculture." In this connection, what the review of the latest scientific sources published in the field of smart agriculture specifies, this issue in recent years is due to attention to the issues of food security, global warming, etc., has become one of the main programs of the countries. The growing volume of scientific productions in this sector also shows more attention to this sector. However, in our country, despite addressing issues such as agricultural development and sustainable agriculture, the sectors and fields of smart agriculture are still less considered as a scientific topic. There is no doubt that agricultural activities in the rural areas of our country also have low scientific ability, and being up-to-date with the latest scientific achievements is one of the necessities for realizing the goals of "Agricultural Development" in these areas. Study on smart agriculture research to know the scientific status of this issue among countries, the main issues and the most common methods of improvement in agricultural activities in geographical locations, and most importantly, determine that the issue of Smart Agriculture should be taken seriously in our country and specifically in rural areas were done.
 
Methodology
Conducting research related to Scientometrics; identify the main trends and contexts in scientific productions in the field under analysis so that researchers can gain insights into the structure, social networks, and thematic interests. The chosen approach in the research is based on Scientometrics. Analysis methods based on this method are used. Therefore, in terms of approach, the research is a kind of quantitative study, and in terms of applied purpose, it was carried out using the Scientometrics research method. Library study methods were used to study theoretical literature and collect research information. In the information gathering section, to achieve appropriate results, which are highly dependent on more and more complete information in scientific databases, three more important databases were compared. According to this comparison, the Scopus database was determined as the source of information collection. Also, the Bibliometrix library in the R Programming environment and the VOSviewer program were used for analysis.
 
Results and discussion
In the subject of Smart Agriculture, most scientific activities have been carried out by India, China, and the United States. These countries have developed this field by allocating major financial resources. The European Union and the National Natural Science Foundation of China have been among the most important national supporters in developing this sector. However, in smart agriculture, emphasis is placed on information and communication technology; many of the changes resulting from innovations also occur through technology. Internet of Things, machine learning, and big data have been formed as emerging technologies in this field. Each of these fields indicates the use of interdisciplinary and applied sciences. Nevertheless, the important point in this context is international cooperation and communication between countries in the field of scientific development and the application of smart agriculture. This leads to expanding scientific fields and global acceptance of the subject. Based on the results, there are three main clusters of cooperation between countries, and most of the cooperation has been limited to the countries of India, the USA, and China. Most scientific cooperation in our country has been limited to Asian countries.
 
Conclusion
The issue of "Smart Agriculture" is now at a stage of global acceptance, and it seems that this issue should also be considered in our country. In our country, despite addressing issues such as agricultural development and sustainable agriculture, the sectors and fields of smart agriculture are still less considered scientific topics. There is no doubt that agricultural activities in the rural areas of our country also have low scientific ability, and being up-to-date with the latest scientific achievements is one of the necessities for realizing the goals of "Agricultural Development" in these areas. By adapting the research results that have been shown in recent years, scientific researchers in the rural areas of our country are presenting the "Smart Village" approach. Smart agriculture can be considered a sector under this topic. This research also calls for continued support for policies and increased investment in the field of Smart Agriculture research in our country.
Funding
There is no funding support.
 
Authors’ Contribution
Authors contributed equally to the conceptualization and writing of the article. All of the authors approved thecontent of the manuscript and agreed on all aspects of the work declaration of competing interest none.
 
Conflict of Interest
Authors declared no conflict of interest.
 
Acknowledgments
We are grateful to all the scientific consultants of this paper.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Sustainable Development
  • Sustainable Agriculture
  • Village
  • Smart Village
  • Smart Farming
  1. اسدی، علی؛ براتی، علی‌اکبر؛ احمدی، حسنا و گلابی فر، جاسم. (1401). واکاوی آسیب‌پذیری معیشت خانوارهای روستایی نسبت به تغییرات اقلیمی در استان کرمانشاه. مجله پژوهش‌های روستایی، 13(2)، 225- 210. https://doi.org/10.22059/jrur.2021.325393.1644
  2. ثابت، فرید و محمدپور، مسلم. (1400). کشاورزی هوشمند. مجله ترویجی علم و فناوری اطاعات کشاورزی، 4(7)، 58-49. https://doi.org/10.22092/aistj.2022.359077.1067
  3. حیدری ساربان، وکیل و مجنونی توتاخانه، علی. (1396). بررسی عوامل محیطی، اقتصادی و اجتماعی بر دانش کشاورزان گندم‌کار درباره کشاورزی پایدار در استان ایلام. مجله جغرافیا و آمایش شهری، 23، 86- 77. https://doi.org/10.22111/gaij.2017.3225
  4. دانش، فرشید و قویدل، سمیه. (1402). یک قرن مشارکت علمی پژوهشگران بروسلا و بروسلوز: مطالعه علم‌سنجی. مجله پژوهشنامه علم‌سنجی، 9(1). 340- 313. https://doi.org/10.22070/rsci.2021.14770.1514
  5. داوودی، هانیه؛ شعبانعلی فمی، حسین و کلانتری، خلیل. (1393). راهکارهای بهبود کارکرد پارک‌های علم و فناوری در توسعه فناوری‌های کشاورزی. مجله تحقیقات اقتصاد و توسعه کشاورزی ایران، 45(2)، 361- 351. https://doi.org/10.22059/ijaedr.2014.52171
  6. ظریفیان، شاپور؛ خجسته، حامد و بیات، پرویز. (1396). عوامل مؤثر بر پذیرش آبیاری قطره‌ای توسط نخل کاران شهرستان دشتستان. مجله تحقیقات اقتصاد و توسعه کشاورزی، 48-2، 655- 647. https://doi.org/10.22059/ijaedr.2018.65239
  7. علیپور، علیرضا؛ موسوی، سید حبیب‌الله؛ خلیلیان، صادق و مرتضوی، سید ابوالقاسم. (1397). خودکفایی گندم و رشد جمعیت در چشم‌انداز 1404 در ایران (درآمدی بر نقش سیاست خرید تضمینی). مجله تحقیقات اقتصاد و توسعه کشاورزی، 2- 49(4)، 649- 635. https://doi.org/10.22059/ijaedr.2018.254163.668578
  8. قارون، زهرا؛ شعبانعلی‌فمی، حسین؛ کلانتری، خلیل و معصومیان اصل، احمد. (1391). عوامل مؤثر بر به‌کارگیری فناوری اطلاعات در مدیریت گاوداری‌های صنعتی شیری (مورد: غرب استان تهران). مجله تحقیقات اقتصاد و توسعه کشاورزی ایران، 43(4)، 572- 561. https://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.20084838.1391.43.4.5.9
  9. قاسمی جوبشهر، الهه. (1398). مطالعه کشت و کار لوبیا در راستای کشاورزی پایدار. رساله دکتری، دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشگاه ایلام.
  10. کرمی، عزت‌الله. (1374). ترویج کشاورزی، مسئله توسعه پایدار در ایران، ماهنامه جهاد (صاحب‌امتیاز: معاونت ترویج و نظام بهره‌برداری وزارت جهاد کشاورزی). 5(11)، 6-3.
  11. محمدحسینی، فرزانه؛ نوری‌پور، مهدی و احمدوند، مصطفی. (1402). امکان‌سنجی تغییر کشت از برنج به لوبیا جهت توسعه بخش کشاورزی- روستایی در شرایط بحران خشک‌سالی (موردمطالعه: شهرستان لنجان). مجله پژوهش‌های روستایی، 14(4). 731- 712. https://doi.org/10.22059/jrur.2023.92921
  12. منصوری، حامد؛ منصوری، لیلا؛ جمشیدی، خلیل؛ راستگو، مهدی و مرادی روح‌الله. (1392). جذب و کارایی مصرف نور در کشت مخلوط افزایش ذرت- لوبیا در منطقه زنجان. مجله تولید و فناوری محصولات زراعی و باغی، 3(9)، 26- 15. http://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.22518517.1392.3.9.2.5
  13. Alipour, A., Mousavi, S. H., Khalilian, S., & Mortazavi, S. A. (2018). Wheat self-sufficiency and population growth in the perspective of 1404 in Iran (income on the role of guaranteed purchase policy). Journal of Agricultural Economics and Development Research, 49(4), 635-649. https://doi.org/10.22059/ijaedr.2018.254163.668578. [In Persian].
  14. Alreshidi, E. (2019). Smart sustainable agriculture (SSA) solution underpinned by internet of things (IoT) and artificial intelligence (AI). ArXiv Preprint ArXiv:1906.03106. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.14569/IJACSA.2019.0100513.
  15. Armenta-Medina, D., Ramirez-delReal, T. A., Villanueva-Vásquez, D., & Mejia-Aguirre, C. (2020). Trends on advanced information and communication technologies for improving agricultural productivities: A bibliometric analysis. Agronomy, 10(12), 1989. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10121989.
  16. Asadi, A., Barati, A. A., Ahmadi, H. & Ghalibfar, J. (2022). Analyzing the vulnerability of rural households' livelihoods to climate changes in Kermanshah province. Journal of Rural Research, 13(2), 225-210. https://doi.org/10.22059/jrur.2021.325393.1644. [In Persian].
  17. Bechar, A., & Vigneault, C. (2016). Agricultural robots for field operations: Concepts and components. Biosystems Engineering, 149, 94–111.
  18. Bechar, A., & Vigneault, C. (2017). Agricultural robots for field operations. Part 2: Operations and systems. Biosystems Engineering, 153, 110–128.
  19. Bennett, E., Carpenter, S., Gordon, L., Ramankutty, N., Balvanera, P., Campbell, B., Cramer, W., Foley, J., Folke, C., & Karlberg, L. (2014). Toward a more resilient agriculture. Solutions, 5(5), 65–75.
  20. Braun, A.-T., Colangelo, E., & Steckel, T. (2018). Farming in the Era of Industrie 4.0. Procedia Cirp, 72, 979–984. https://doi.org/Farming in the Era of Industrie 4.0
  21. Brodt, S., Six, J., Feenstra, G., Ingels, C., & Campbell, D. (2011). Sustainable agriculture. Nat. Educ. Knowl, 3(10), 1–2.
  22. Ceballos, H. G., Fangmeyer Jr, J., Galeano, N., Juarez, E., & Cantu-Ortiz, F. J. (2017). Impelling research productivity and impact through collaboration: a scientometric case study of knowledge management. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 15(3), 346–355. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41275-017-0064-8.
  23. Christen, O., & Heyer, W. (2010). Sustainable development of agriculture, fisheries, and forestry. O. Christen, V. Squires, R. Lal, & R. Hudson, Interdisciplinary and Sustainability Issues in Food and Agriculture, 68–96.
  24. Cobo, M. J., López‐Herrera, A. G., Herrera‐Viedma, E., & Herrera, F. (2011). Science mapping software tools: Review, analysis, and cooperative study among tools. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(7), 1382–1402. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21525.
  25. Contractor, N. S., Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (2006). Testing multitheoretical, multilevel hypotheses about organizational networks: An analytic framework and empirical example. Academy of Management Review, 31(3), 681–703.
  26. Danesh, F., & Gavidel, So. (2023). A century of scientific participation of brucella and brucellosis researchers: a scientific study. Journal of Scientific Research, 9(1), 313- 340. https://doi.org/10.22070/rsci.2021.14770.1514. [In Persian].
  27. Davoudi, H., Shabanali Femi, H., & Kalantari, Kh. (2014). Strategies for improving the function of science and technology parks in the development of agricultural technologies. Iranian Journal of Economic and Agricultural Development Research, 45(2), 351-361. https://doi.org/10.22059/ijaedr.2014.52171. [In Persian].
  28. Floreano, D., & Wood, R. J. (2015). Science, technology and the future of small autonomous drones. Nature, 521(7553), 460–466. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14542.
  29. Garoun, Z., Shabanali, H., Kalantari, Kh., & Masoumian Asl, A. (2013). Factors affecting the use of information technology in the management of industrial dairy farms (case: west of Tehran province). Journal of Economic Research and Agricultural Development of Iran, 43(4), 572-561. https://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.20084838.1391.43.4.5.9. [In Persian].
  30. Gasmi Jobshahr, E. (2018). The study of bean cultivation in the direction of sustainable agriculture. PhD thesis, Faculty of Agriculture, Ilam University. [In Persian].
  31. Guan, J., & Pang, L. (2018). Bidirectional relationship between network position and knowledge creation in Scientometrics. Scientometrics, 115(1), 201–222. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2673-2.
  32. Gurmessa, D. K., & Assefa, S. G. (2023). A Scoping Review of the Smart Irrigation Literature Using Scientometric Analysis. Journal of Engineering, 2023, 1–10. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/2537005.
  33. He, K., Zhang, J., & Zeng, Y. (2019). Knowledge domain and emerging trends of agricultural waste management in the field of social science: A scientometric review. Science of the Total Environment, 670, 236–244. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.03.184
  34. Heydari Sarban, V., & Majnoni Totakhana, A. (2016). Investigation of environmental, economic and social factors on the knowledge of wheat farmers about sustainable agriculture in Ilam province. Journal of Geography and Urban Planning, 23, 86-77. https://doi.org/10.22111/gaij.2017.3225. [In Persian].
  35. Huo, D., Malik, A. W., Ravana, S. D., Rahman, A. U., & Ahmedy, I. (2024). Mapping smart farming: Addressing agricultural challenges in data-driven era. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 189, 113858. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2023.113858.
  36. Kamilaris, A., Gao, F., Prenafeta-Boldu, F. X., & Ali, M. I. (2016). Agri-IoT: A semantic framework for Internet of Things-enabled smart farming applications. 2016 IEEE 3rd World Forum on Internet of Things (WF-IoT), 442–447. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1109/WF-IoT.2016.7845467.
  37. Karami, E. (1996). Agricultural promotion, the problem of sustainable development in Iran. Monthly Jihad (license holder: Deputy of Extension and Exploitation System of the Ministry of Jihad Agriculture), 5(11), 3-6. [In Persian].
  38. Krishnan, P., Praharaj, C. S., Kantharajan, G., Bhoomaiah, D., Sekar, I., Soam, S. K., & Rao, C. S. (2021). A scientometric analysis of research on pulses in India during 2000–2017. Agricultural Research, 1–14. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s40003-021-00595-3.
  39. Kumar, S., Dhoble, S., & Shah, L. (2019). A Bibliometric Study of the Global Research Publication Activities in Rapeseed and Mustard. International Journal of Information, 11(1), 1.
  40. Li, J., Xia, E., Wang, L., Yan, K., Zhu, L., & Huang, J. (2022). Knowledge domain and emerging trends of climate-smart agriculture: A bibliometric study. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(46), 70360–70379. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-20796-9.
  41. Lipper, L., & Zilberman, D. (2018). A short history of the evolution of the climate smart agriculture approach and its links to climate change and sustainable agriculture debates. Climate Smart Agriculture: Building Resilience to Climate Change, 13–30. DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-61194-5.
  42. Luis, E. C., & Celma, D. (2020). Circular economy. A review and bibliometric analysis. Sustainability, 12(16), 6381. DOI:10.3390/su12166381.
  43. Mansouri, H., Mansouri, L., Jamshidi, Kh., Rastgo, M., & Moradi. R. (2012). Absorption and efficiency of light consumption in corn-bean intercropping in Zanjan region. Crop and Garden Production and Technology, 3(9), 15-26. [In Persian].
  44. Médiène, S., Valantin-Morison, M., Sarthou, J.-P., De Tourdonnet, S., Gosme, M., Bertrand, M., Roger-Estrade, J., Aubertot, J.-N., Rusch, A., & Motisi, N. (2011). Agroecosystem management and biotic interactions: a review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 31, 491–514. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-011-0009-1.
  45. Mohammad Hosseini, F., Nouripour, M., & Ahmadvand, M. (2023). Feasibility of changing cultivation from rice to beans for the development of the agricultural-rural sector in the conditions of drought crisis (case study: Lanjan city). Rural Research Journal, 14(4), 712-731. https://doi.org/10.22059/jrur.2023.92921. [In Persian].
  46. Moysiadis, V., Sarigiannidis, P., Vitsas, V., & Khelifi, A. (2021). Smart farming in Europe. Computer Science Review, 39, 100345. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosrev.2020.100345.
  47. Newman, M. E. J. (2001). Scientific collaboration networks. I. Network construction and fundamental results. Physical Review E, 64(1), 16131. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.64.016131.
  48. Prasifka, J., Hellmich, R., & Weiss, M. (2009). Role of biotechnology in sustainable agriculture. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  49. Riahi, V., & Nasire Zare, S. (2022). Barriers to the Efficiency of the Olive Value Chain in Rural Areas of Tarom County, Iran. Journal of Research and Rural Planning, 11(2), 81–99. https://doi.org/10.22067/jrrp.v11i2.2201-1037.
  50. Rossel, R. A. V., & McBratney, A. B. (1998). Soil chemical analytical accuracy and costs: implications from precision agriculture. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture, 38(7), 765–775. https://doi.org/10.1071/EA97158.
  51. Sabet, F., Mohammadpour, M. (2022). Smart farming. Extension Journal of Agricultural Information Science and Technology, 4(7), 58-49. 10.22092/aistj.2022.359077.1067. [In Persian].
  52. Sagar, A., Kademani, B. S., & Bhanumurthy, K. (2014). Agriculture research in India: A scientometric mapping of publications. DESIDOC Journal of Library & Information Technology, 34(3), 222- 206.
  53. Sarker, M. N. I., Wu, M., Alam, G. M. M., & Islam, M. S. (2019). Role of climate smart agriculture in promoting sustainable agriculture: a systematic literature review. International Journal of Agricultural Resources, Governance and Ecology, 15(4), 323–337. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1504/IJARGE.2019.104199.
  54. Siwach, A. K. (2020). Indian Wheat research output in two decades: A bibliometric study based on scopus data from 1996-2015. Retrieved on December, 15, 2020. https://doi.org/https://core.ac.uk/reader/286730230.
  55. Stein, A., & van Groenigen, J. W. (1997). Spatial and temporal statistical procedures to support decision making for smart farming. Proceedings of the INRA-KCW Workshop on Decision Support Systems, Laon, France, Quantitative Approaches in Systems Analysis 15, 125–129.
  56. Vermesan, O., & Friess, P. (2016). Digitising the Industry Internet of Things Connecting the Physical. Digital and Virtual Worlds, 153–183. https://books.google.com.
  57. Vinkler, P. (2010). The evaluation of research by scientometric indicators. Elsevier.
  58. Zarifian, Sh., Khojaste, H., & Bayat, P. (2018). Factors affecting the acceptance of drip irrigation by palm growers of Dashtestan city. Iranian Journal of Economic and Agricultural Development Research, 48(2), 655-647. https://doi.org/10.22059/ijaedr.2018.65239. [In Persian].
  59. Zebakh, S., Arvanitis, R., Boutracheh, H., & Sadiki, M. (2017). Trends in the Moroccan agricultural research: an exploratory bibliometric analysis (2005-2015). STI 2017. Open Indicators: Innovation, Participation and Actor-Based STI Indicators, 5, 255–268. https://doi.org/https://d1wqtxts1xzle7.cloudfront.net.