ارائه الگو بازاریابی گردشگری روستایی مبتنی بر سامانه‌های اطلاعات جغرافیایی مشارکتی مطالعه موردی: روستاهای کریک و کوخدان شهرستان دنا

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 گروه جغرافیا و برنامه ریزی روستایی، دانشکده علوم انسانی، دانشگاه تربیت مدرس، تهران، ایران

2 گروه جغرافیا و برنامه ریزی روستایی، دانشکده علوم انسانی، دانشگاه تربیت مدرس، تهران،ایران

چکیده

در این پژوهش پس از بررسی روستاهای هدف گردشگری کریک و کوخدان (شهرستان دنا)، الگوی بازاریابی گردشگری روستایی مبتنی بر سامانه‌های اطلاعات جغرافیایی مشارکتی ارائه‌شده است. بدین منظور برای تحلیل داده از روش پژوهش کیفی مبتنی بر نظریه داده بنیاد بهره گرفته‌شده است. ابتدا با استفاده از روش نمونه‌گیری هدفمند و نظری، افراد مطلع واجد شرایط از میان خبرگان محلی، مدیران روستا، صاحبان مشاغل و کارکنان پارک ملی دنا انتخاب شد. داده موردنیاز پژوهش ماحصل بازدیدهای حضوری، مصاحبه‌های عمیق و نیمه ساختاریافته و جلسات مشارکتی بوده که این فرایند در چندین مرحله تکرار شده است. به‌منظور تدوین الگوی مناسب بازاریابی گردشگری روستایی، تجزیه‌وتحلیل اطلاعات در پنج مرحله کلی صورت گرفته است. این مراحل عبارت‌اند از: 1) کدگذاری باز و تبیین مفاهیم، 2) توسعه مفاهیم و طبقات، 3) تحلیل داده برای زمینه، 4) دستیابی به فرایند تحلیل و 5) یکپارچه‌سازی طبقات. در نهایت الگوی پارادایمی، بر اساس شرایط علّی (فناوری ارتباطات و تسهیل مشارکت)، بستر (عرضه گردشگری و جذابیت مقصد)، عوامل مداخله‌گر (چالش‌های فناورانه و جنبه‌های مدیریتی_ساختاری)، راهبردها (بازاریابی گردشگری با سامانه‌های اطلاعات جغرافیایی مشارکتی، ملزومات سیاست‌گذاری) و پیامدها (توسعه گردشگری مقصد) استخراج‌شده است. با توجه به یافته‌های پژوهش، جهت رفع چالش‌های مدیریتی و فناورانه که مانعی برای تحقق بازاریابی گردشگری روستایی است، راهکارهایی همچون توسعه بستر مکانی-مشارکتی بازاریابی، ایجاد نهاد مستقل گردشگری و توانمندسازی اجتماعی به‌دست‌آمده است. درنهایت، زیر مقوله‌های ایجاد مزیت رقابتی، نگهداشت گردشگران و مردم بومی به‌عنوان پیامدهای حاصل از اجرای این راهبردها مطرح‌شده است.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله [English]

Designing a Rural Tourism Marketing Model based on Participatory Geographic Information System: A case study of Karaik and Kokhdan Villages, Dena City

نویسندگان [English]

  • Athena Moeinmehr 1
  • عبدالرضا رکن الدین افتخاری 2
  • Mahdi Portaheri 1
1 Department of Geography and Rural Planning, Faculty of Humanities, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran
2 Department of Geography and Rural Planning, Faculty of Humanities, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran
چکیده [English]

A B S T R A C T
This research focuses on developing a rural tourism marketing model based on a participatory geographic information system for the villages of Karaik and Kokhdan in Kohgiluyeh and Boyar Ahmad province. A qualitative research methodology based on Grounded Theory was employed for data analysis. Data collection involved in-depth and semi-structured interviews, collaborative meetings, note-taking, and observation. A total of 28 participants, including local experts, village managers, business owners, and employees of Dena National Park, were selected using purposeful, snowball, and theoretical sampling. The data analysis process unfolded in five stages such as open coding to identify concepts, developing concepts in term of their properties and dimensions, contextual data analysis, bringing process into the analysis, and integrating categories. The resulting paradigm model encompasses causal conditions (technology characteristics and facilitation of participation), context (tourism supply and destination attractiveness), intervening conditions (technological challenges and managerial /structural aspects), strategies (development of a participatory spatial system and policy making requirements), and outcomes (destination tourism development). The findings indicate that to address the primary issue of technological management challenges in rural tourism marketing based on PGIS, strategies such as developing a participatory spatial marketing system and enhancing social empowerment are essential. The implementation of these strategies is expected to yield competitive advantages and improve tourism sustainability.
Extended Abstract
Introduction
In today's world, most urban dwellers seek respite from pollution, overcrowding, and stressful conditions of city life by vacationing in pristine areas, engaging with nature, and experiencing rural life. This trend presents significant opportunities for rural areas with natural attractions, rich wildlife, and unique cultural traditions. However, rural tourism often faces challenges related to infrastructure, management, and marketing structures in rural areas. Currently, web-based information plays a crucial role in marketing tourism products. Moreover, collaborative marketing approaches have transformed rural tourism development and planning methodologies. Participatory geographic Information Systems enhance community involvement in policy-making and support the objectives of non-governmental organizations and local groups through geographic data. Collaborative geographic data allows local residents to gather detailed, accurate information about their environment, leveraging their firsthand experiences. Despite advancements in information and communication technology and geographic information systems impacting tourism studies, research on information technology applications in rural tourism has largely focused on online services or travel agency websites, with insufficient attention to the spatial data relevant to rural tourism marketing. Therefore, this study aims to address these challenges by designing a marketing model that incorporates PGIS. The central research question is:
-What constitutes an appropriate model for rural tourism marketing utilizing PGIS in the selected villages?
 
Methodology
To achieve this, a qualitative research method grounded in the work of Strauss and Corbin (2015) was employed. Data collection involved in-depth and semi-structured interviews, collaborative meetings, note-taking, and observation. A total of 28 individuals, including local experts, village managers, business owners, and Dena National Park employees, were selected using purposeful, snowball, and theoretical sampling methods. The data analysis process was conducted in five stages: open coding to identify concepts, developing concepts based on their properties and dimensions, contextual analysis, integrating processes into the analysis, and synthesizing categories.
 
Results and discussion
From the initial stages of analysis, 122 basic concepts, 24 subcategories, and 9 main categories emerged. The final paradigm model was constructed based on causal conditions (technology characteristics and facilitation of participation), context (tourism supply and destination attractiveness), intervening conditions (technological challenges and managerial/structural aspects), strategies (development of a participatory spatial system and policy-making requirements), and outcomes (destination tourism development). The primary concern identified in this research pertains to management and technological challenges. Participants proposed various strategies and solutions to address these issues. Strategies such as developing a participatory spatial marketing system and enhancing social empowerment were identified to resolve the main challenges of technological management in rural tourism marketing based on PGIS. The anticipated outcomes of these strategies include competitive advantages and increased tourism sustainability.
 
Conclusion
A review of existing literature on rural tourism marketing reveals that while some studies have focused on prioritizing marketing components in rural areas (e.g., Mahdi Hessam et al., 2016; Sheikhi & Pazoki, 2016), others have identified factors influencing rural tourism marketing through qualitative models and proposed solutions. The unique contribution of this research lies in introducing a novel aspect of rural marketing through PGIS, enabling local communities to produce spatial data and highlight tourism products and unique features of their destinations on a map. Tourists can access a wealth of integrated tourism data through a participatory web platform, thus saving time in their decision-making processes. The innovation of this study is evident in the proposed model for the selected villages. While the application of information and communication technology in urban tourism marketing has become commonplace, the use of PGIS in rural tourism marketing remains limited. Consequently, there is a lack of research focused on developing a rural tourism marketing model utilizing PGIS. This model can yield numerous benefits, including local community participation, enhanced data management and planning for destinations, and improved access to diverse tourism information for tourists, facilitating informed decision-making regarding services. Future studies could explore the implementation of a web platform based on this system.
 
Funding
There is no funding support.
 
Authors’ Contribution
The authors contributed equally to the conceptualization and writing of the article. All of the authors approved the content of the manuscript and agreed on all aspects of the work declaration of competing interest none.
 
Conflict of Interest
The authors declared no conflict of interest.
 
Acknowledgments
We are grateful to all the scientific consultants of this paper.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Rural Tourism Marketing
  • Participatory Geographic Information System
  • Grounded Theory
  • Karaik and Kokhdan Villages
  1. امیری، فوژان؛ محبی، سراج‌الدین؛ رنجبر، محمدحسین و مهدی باقری. (1398). شناسایی عوامل مؤثر بر بازاریابی گردشگری و ارائه مدل مناسب اکوتوریسم و گردشگری روستایی (موردمطالعه: استان هرمزگان). برنامه‌ریزی منطقه‌ای، 9(35)، 95-104. 20.1001.1.22516735.1398.9.35.8.5 DOI:
  2. تاج‌زاده نمین، ابوالفضل؛ بدیع زاده، علی؛ پورفرج، اکبر و اله یاری، سمیرا. (1399). الگوی بازاریابی مقصدهای گردشگری روستایی در ایران. مطالعات اجتماعی گردشگری، 16(8)، 59-88.
  3. حسام, مهدی؛ چراغی, مهدی؛ اکبری, زینب و رهبان، سمیه. (1396). ارزیابی و اولویت‌بندی مؤلفه‌های آمیخته بازاریابی تأثیرگذار در توسعه گردشگری روستایی (مطالعه موردی: روستاهای شهرستان فومن). پژوهش‌های روستایی, 8(3), 470-487. DOI: 10.22059/jrur.2017.63469
  4. سند چشم‌انداز توسعه بخش میراث فرهنگی و گردشگری کشور ایران در افق سند چشم‌انداز.1384-1404.
  5. شیخی، داوود و پازکی، معصومه. (1396). ارزیابی و اولویت‌بندی عوامل مؤثر بر بازاریابی گردشگری روستایی با استفاده از مدل آمیخته بازاریابی (موردمطالعه: دهستان جوزان، شهرستان ملایر). پژوهش‌های روستایی، 8(3)، 488-501. DOI: 10.22059/jrur.2017.63478
  6. صفری سیاهکل رودی، عماد؛ عباسی، ابراهیم و نسیمی، محمدعلی. (1401). بررسی رابطه مدل بازاریابی گردشگری روستایی با ارزش ویژه برند مقصد (مطالعه موردی: روستاهای مناطق کوهستانی شهرستان رودسر). مطالعات جغرافیایی مناطق کوهستانی، ۳ (۱)، ۷۷-۹۱. DOI:10.52547/gsma.3.1.77
  7. عباسی سورکی، فاطمه؛ شیخی، احمدرضا و نوری زمان‌آبادی، هدایت اله. (1401). ارزیابی نقش فناوری اطلاعات و ارتباطات در توسعه گردشگری روستایی به گردشگری هوشمند نمونه موردی: بخش بن رود شهرستان اصفهان. چهارمین کنفرانس بین‌المللی مدیریت، گردشگری و تکنولوژی.
  8. عبدلی، سیده فاطمه و مرادی اصل، امیر. (1394). بررسی فناوری اطلاعات و ارتباطات در صنعت گردشگری ایران، دومین همایش ملی گردشگری، سرمایه‌های ملی و چشم‌انداز آینده، اصفهان.
  9. Abbasi, F. S., Sheikhi, A., & Zamanabadi, H. (2022). Evaluation of the role of information and communication technology in the development of rural tourism for smart tourism, a case study: Ben Roud section of Isfahan city. The fourth international conference on management, tourism and rural technology and development. [In Persian].
  10. Abdoli, S., & Moradi Asl, A. (2012). Survey of information and communication technology in Iran's tourism industry, The second national conference on tourism, national capitals and future prospects, Isfahan. [In Persian].
  11. Amiri, F., Mohebi, S., Ranjbar, M. H, & Bagheri, M. (2018). Identifying effective factors on tourism marketing and providing a suitable model of ecotourism and rural tourism (case study: Hormozgan province). Regional Planning, 9(35), 95-104. DOI: 20.1001.1.22516735.1398.9.35.8.5. [In Persian].
  12. Aziiza, A. A., & Susanto, T. D. (2020). The smart village model for rural area (case study: Banyuwangi Regency). In IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering. 722(1), 012011. IOP Publishing. DOI 10.1088/1757-899X/722/1/012011.
  13. Birks, M., & Mills, J. (2015). Grounded theory: A practical guide. Sage. DOI: 10.4135/9781526402196.
  14. Brown, G. (2016). A review of sampling effects and response bias in internet participatory mapping (PPGIS/PGIS/VGI). Transactions in GIS, 39-56. DOI: 10.1111/tgis.12207.
  15. Brown, G., & Weber, D. (2013). Using public participation GIS (PPGIS) on the Geoweb to monitor tourism development preferences. Journal of Sustainable Tourism21(2), 192-211. DOI: 10.1080/09669582.2012.693501.
  16. Bryant, A. (2017). Grounded theory and grounded theorizing: Pragmatism in research practice. Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/acprof: oso/9780199922604.001.0001.
  17. Cao, Z. C. (2022). Tourism and the economic paradigm. A modern guide to tourism economics, 15-36. DOI:10.4337/9781800378766.00008.
  18. Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: a practical guide through qualitative analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
  19. Chun Tie, Y., Birks, M., & Francis, K. (2019). Grounded theory research: A design framework for novice researchers. SAGE open medicine, 2(7), 2050312118822927, DOI: 10.1177/2050312118822927.
  20. Chung N., Lee H., Lee S. J., & Koo, C. (2015). The influence of tourism website on tourists' behavior to determine destination selection: A case study of creative economy in Korea. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 96, 130-143. DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2015.03.004
  21. Dolnicar, S., & Ring, A. (2014). Tourism marketing research: Past, present and future. Annals of tourism research47, 31-47. DOI: 10.1016/j.annals.2014.03.008.
  22. Evans, N. G.) 2015(. Sustainable competitive advantage in tourism organizations: A strategic model applying service dominant logic and tourism›s defining characteristics. Tourism Management Perspectives, 18, 14-25. DOI: 10.1016/j.tmp.2015.12.015.
  23. Flores-Crespo, P., Bermudez-Edo, M., & Garrido, J. L. (2022). Smart tourism in Villages: Challenges and the Alpujarra Case Study. Procedia Computer Science, 204(2), 663-670. DOI: 10.1016/j.procs.2022.08.080.
  24. Ganapati, S. (2010). Public participation geographic information systems: A literature survey. Comparative e-government, 449-466. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8306.2006.00702. x.
  25. Hadley, G. (2017). Grounded theory in applied linguistics research: A practical guide. Taylor & Francis. DOI: 10.4324/9781315758671.
  26. Haklay Muki. (2013). Citizen science and volunteered geographic information: Overview and typology of participation Crowdsourcing geographic knowledge. Springer, 105-122. DOI: 10.1007/978-94-007-4587-2_7.
  27. Hessam, M., Chiraghi, M., Akbari, Z., & Rehban, S. (2016). Evaluation and prioritization of effective marketing mix components in the development of rural tourism (case study: villages of Fuman city). Rural research, 8(3), 470-487. DOI: 10.22059/jrur.2017.63469. [In Persian].
  28. Kantola, S., Uusitalo, M., Nivala, V., & Tuulentie, S. (2018). Tourism resort users' participation in planning: Testing the public participation geographic information system method in Levi, Finnish Lapland. Tourism management perspectives, 27, 22-32. DOI: 10.1016/j.tmp.2018.04.001.
  29. Liao, Z., & Shi, X. (2017). Web functionality, web content, information security, and online tourism service continuance. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services39, 258-263. DOI: 10.1016/j.jretconser.2017.06.003.
  30. Liu, X., & Xiao, H. (2023). Poverty and Prosperity: Tourism in Rural China. Emerald Publishing Limited. DOI: 10.1108/S2042-1443202313.
  31. Oppermann Martin. (1997). Geography and tourism marketing (Vol. 6): Haworth Press.
  32. Organization of cultural heritage and tourism of Kohgiluyeh and Boyer Ahmad, (2016). [In Persian].
  33. Pan, S. Y., Gao, M., Kim, H., Shah, K. J., Pei, S. L., & Chiang, P. C. (2018). Advances and challenges in sustainable tourism toward a green economy. Science of the total environment635, 452-469. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.04.134.
  34. Pietilä, M., & Fagerholm, N. (2016). Visitors' place-based evaluations of unacceptable tourism impacts in Oulanka National Park, Finland. Tourism Geographies, 18(3), 258-279. DOI: 10.1080/14616688.2016.1169313.
  35. Pietilä, M., & Kangas, K. (2015). Examining the relationship between recreation settings and experiences in Oulanka National Park – A spatial approach. Journal of Outdoor Recreation and Tourism, 9, 26–36. DOI: 10.1016/j.jort.2015.03.004.
  36. Safari S, E, Abbasi, E. Nasimi, M, A. Saeedi, P. (2022). Presenting the rural tourism marketing model with the qualitative approach of theme analysis (case study: Rodsar city). Geographical perspective.3(1), 67-78. Doi:10.52547/gsma.3.1.77. [In Persian].
  37. Sheikhi, D., & Pazoki, M. (2017). Assessing and Prioritizing the Factors Affecting Rural Tourism Marketing Using the Marketing Mix Model (A Case Study: Jozan District, Malayer Township). Journal of Rural Research, 8(3), 488-501. DOI: 10.22059/jrur.2017.63478. [In Persian].
  38. Sieber, R. (2006). Public participation geographic information systems: A literature review and framework. Annals of the association of American Geographers, 96(3), 491-507. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8306.2006. 00702.x.
  39. Sui, D., Goodchild, M., & Elwood, S. (2012). Volunteered geographic information, the exaflood, and the growing digital divide. In Crowdsourcing geographic knowledge: Volunteered geographic information (VGI) in theory and practice. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 1-12. DOI:10.1007/978-94-007-4587-2_1
  40. Tajzadeh Namin, A., Badiazadeh, A., Porfaraj, A., Elah Yaari. S. (2019). Marketing pattern of rural tourism destinations in Iran. Tourism Social Studies, 2, 59-88. [In Persian].
  41. Tehran Chamber of Commerce, Industries, Mines and Agriculture (2018). Iran's position in travel and tourism competitiveness index. Vice President of Economic Surveys. [In Persian].
  42. The-Statistics-Portal. (2018). Number of internet users worldwide from 2005 to 2017 (in millions). 273018. https://www. Statista. Com/statistics/273018/number-of-internet-users-worldwide/.
  43. Zhao, L., & Zhang, D. (2021). Research on the path of revitalizing rural tourism from the perspective of smart tourism. In E3S Web of Conferences, 251, 03037. EDP Sciences. DOI:10.1051/e3sconf/202125103037.