ارائه مدل پارادایمی توسعه مقصدهای گردشگری هوشمند در مناطق روستایی

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

گروه جغرافیای انسانی و برنامه‌ریزی، دانشکده جغرافیا، دانشگاه تهران، ایران

چکیده

گردشگری هوشمند، نقش اساسی در مدیریت کارآمد منابع و ارتقای کیفیت تجربه گردشگران ایفا می‌کند. در مناطق روستایی که معمولاً با چالش‌هایی نظیر کمبود زیرساخت‌های فنی، ضعف در استفاده از فناوری‌های نوین و نبود آگاهی اجتماعات محلی مواجه هستند، هوشمند سازی گردشگری می‌تواند پلی مؤثر برای بهره‌گیری از ظرفیت‌های بالقوه این مناطق باشد. پژوهش حاضر با هدف ارائه مدل پارادایمی توسعه مقصدهای گردشگری هوشمند در انجام‌شده است. روش‌شناسی این پژوهش از نوع کیفی و مبتنی بر نظریه داده بنیاد است که در آن از مصاحبه‌های نیمه ساختاریافته با 15 خبره حوزه گردشگری و برنامه‌ریزی روستایی به‌صورت هدفمند استفاده‌شده است. کدگذاری و تحلیل داده‌ها در سه مرحله کدگذاری باز، محوری و انتخابی انجام‌گرفته تا مدل پارادایمی توسعه مقصدهای گردشگری هوشمند طراحی شود. در این پژوهش، شرایط علی، زمینه‌ای، مداخله‌گر، راهبردها و پیامدهای گردشگری هوشمند شناسایی و تحلیل شدند. یافته‌ها نشان داد که عوامل اقتصادی، فرهنگی، زیرساختی و قانونی تأثیر زیادی بر موفقیت این رویکرد دارند. علاوه بر این، استفاده از راهبردهایی نظیر آموزش و توانمندسازی جامعه محلی، سرمایه‌گذاری در زیرساخت‌ها و توسعه محتوای دیجیتال، به تحقق گردشگری هوشمند کمک می‌کند. نوآوری پژوهش در ارائه یک مدل پارادایمی برای توسعه مقصدهای گردشگری هوشمند در مناطق روستایی است که از طریق تحلیل شرایط علی، زمینه‌ای، مداخله‌گر، راهبردها و پیامدها صورت گرفته است. راهکارهای حاصل از نتایج این مقاله شامل آموزش و توانمندسازی جوامع محلی، سرمایه‌گذاری در زیرساخت‌های فناوری، توسعه محتوای دیجیتال برای ارتقای تجربه گردشگران، و تقویت نهادهای محلی جهت مدیریت کارآمد گردشگری هوشمند است.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله [English]

A Paradigm Model for Developing Rural Smart Tourism Destinations

نویسندگان [English]

  • Mohammad Reza Rezvani
  • Hassan Ali Faraji sabokbar
  • Mojtaba Ghadiri masoum
  • Hossein Zinati Fakhrabad
Department of Human Geography and Planning, Faculty of Geography, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
چکیده [English]

A B S T R A C T
Smart tourism is pivotal for optimising resource allocation and enhancing the quality of visitor experiences. In rural areas - which frequently suffer from inadequate technical infrastructure, limited uptake of advanced technologies, and low awareness among local residents - smart tourism can serve as a conduit for unlocking these communities’ latent capacities. Guided by grounded theory, we conducted a qualitative study involving semi structured interviews with 15 purposively selected experts in tourism and rural planning. Data were analysed iteratively through open, axial and selective coding, culminating in the construction of a comprehensive paradigm model for rural smart tourism development. The analysis delineated the causal, contextual and intervening conditions shaping smart tourism, along with the associated strategic actions and outcomes. Economic, cultural, infrastructural and regulatory factors emerged as critical determinants of success. Key strategies include capacity building and empowerment of local communities, targeted investment in digital and physical infrastructure, and the creation of rich digital content. By integrating these elements, the study advances a paradigm model that offers a structured pathway for transforming rural destinations into smart tourism hubs. Policy recommendations centre on empowering local stakeholders, expanding technological infrastructure, enriching visitor experiences through digital content, and bolstering local institutions to ensure effective governance of smart tourism initiatives.
Extended Abstract
Introduction
Smart tourism is pivotal in optimising resource management and enhancing visitor experiences, making it a promising strategy for sustainable development. By leveraging advanced technologies and data‑driven practices, smart tourism delivers innovative solutions, especially in rural areas hampered by inadequate infrastructure, limited technology adoption, and low local awareness. In Iran, however, the lack of a comprehensive model for smart tourism development has impeded the full utilization of the country’s rich rural natural, cultural, and historical assets. Responding to this gap, the study proposes a paradigm model for rural smart‑tourism development that foregrounds the dynamic interplay of economic, social, and technological dimensions. Smart rural tourism—enabled by the Internet of Things, big‑data analytics, and collaborative digital platforms—enhances visitor experiences, boosts destination competitiveness, and supports the conservation of local resources. The COVID‑19 pandemic has underscored the need for targeted visitor management; consequently, we highlight the role of modern technologies in delivering contactless services and widening access to information. Building on successful international precedents—most notably the European Union’s smart‑village initiatives—this study identifies the key determinants of rural smart tourism and offers operational strategies for the digital transformation of Iran’s rural destinations.
 
Methodology
This study employs a qualitative, grounded‑theory design. Data were gathered through semi-structured interviews with 15 tourism‑ and rural‑planning experts recruited via snowball sampling, and interviewing continued until theoretical saturation was reached. Coding proceeded iteratively through three stages—open, axial, and selective—using Atlas. ti 9. During open coding, emergent concepts such as “digital infrastructure” and “local community training” were identified. Axial coding then related these concepts to the core phenomenon of smart rural tourism development, generating a paradigmatic model that specifies causal, contextual, and intervening conditions, strategies, and outcomes. Selective coding integrated the categories into a coherent theoretical narrative. Credibility and dependability were strengthened through purposeful participant selection, constant comparative analysis, and member checking.
 
Results and discussion
The findings underscore the pivotal influence of economic, infrastructural, and managerial factors on the advancement of smart rural tourism. Causal conditions—economic (financial resources), infrastructural (communication networks), legal (transparent regulations), technical (modern technologies), and managerial (effective governance)—operate as the primary drivers of smart rural tourism, improving destination accessibility and streamlining tourism services while laying the groundwork for further development. Contextual conditions—cultural (local heritage preservation), social (community interaction), environmental (natural assets) and institutional (local governance structures)—provide the setting within which smart rural tourism takes shape and may either facilitate or constrain progress; strong local culture can motivate resource conservation, whereas weak institutions may hinder development.
Recommended strategies comprise capacity‑building and empowerment of local communities, targeted investment in digital infrastructure, and the creation of locally tailored digital content. Collectively, these measures aim to raise awareness, accelerate technology uptake, and bolster destination competitiveness. Community empowerment fosters active resource stewardship and richer host–guest interaction, whereas high‑quality digital content broadens information access and delivers distinctive smart experiences.
Intervening conditions consist of local digital literacy and stakeholders’ openness to change, particularly among tourism entrepreneurs and homestay operators. Limited digital literacy can retard technology adoption, whereas broad stakeholder support underpins the sustainable implementation of proposed strategies.
The anticipated outcomes are multifaceted, spanning economic (sustained employment), cultural‑social (revival of local traditions), informational (enhanced data accessibility), and spatial (more equitable service distribution) dimensions. Taken together, these benefits reinforce local economies, strengthen place identity and cultural heritage, and elevate the competitive standing of rural destinations.
 
Conclusion
The findings underscore the need for an integrated approach to developing smart tourism destinations. Causal and contextual conditions together constitute the foundations and drivers that enable the effective implementation of strategies. A comparison with earlier studies—including Ibrahimpour et al (2021) and Nadali (2020)—confirms this alignment, particularly concerning infrastructure upgrades and enhanced digital literacy. This study, however, is distinctive in its exclusive focus on rural areas and in the paradigmatic model it advances.
Successful application of the proposed model may generate sustainable employment, elevate residents’ quality of life, safeguard cultural heritage, and promote spatial justice. To realise these objectives, governments and local institutions should prioritise strengthening ICT infrastructure, expanding digital‑literacy programmes, and fostering cross-sector collaboration. Transparent legal frameworks and targeted financial incentives would further galvanise stakeholder participation. Beyond contributing to the sustainable development of rural areas, the model offers a robust analytical scaffold for future research on smart rural tourism.
 
Funding
This research was supported by the National Support Fund for Researchers and Technologists under contract number 4004926, dated April 5, 2022.
 
Authors’ Contributions
All authors equally contributed to the conceptualization, design, and writing of this article. They reviewed and approved the final version of the manuscript and agreed to be accountable for all aspects of the work.
 
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
 
Acknowledgments
The authors gratefully acknowledge the contributions of all scientific advisors who supported this research.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Rural smart tourism
  • Community empowerment
  • Digital infrastructure
  • Tourism destination
  • Cultural identity
  1. ابراهیم‌پور، حبیب؛ رحمتی، منصور و نعمتی، ولی. (1401). امکان‌سنجی توسعه گردشگری هوشمند با تأکید بر توسعه پایدار (مطالعه موردی: شهر اردبیل). مطالعات علوم محیط‌زیست، 7(1)، 4622–4631. https://doi.org/10.22034/jess.2022.145675
  2. پورنگ، علی؛ پورنگ، ناهید و غیور باغبانی، سید مرتضی. (1399). ارائه مدل عوامل مقصد محور مؤثر بر گرایش به مقصد و طول مدت اقامت گردشگران (مطالعه موردی: شهر مشهد). مجله گردشگری شهری، 7(2)، 51–69. https://doi.org/10.22059/jut.2020.290397.732
  3. خاوریان گرمسیر، امیررضا؛ جشنی، مهسا؛ خادم، فاطمه؛ شکوری، بهنوش و ابراهیمی ترک‌محله، ابراهیم. (1403). تحلیلی بر نقش تکنولوژی‌های هوشمند گردشگری در تجربه به‌یادماندنی گردشگران شهری در ایران. مجله گردشگری شهری، 11(4)، 19–37. https://doi.org/10.22059/jut.2024.366326.1160
  4. دشت‌لعلی، زهرا؛ علیقلی، منصوره و نوربخش، سید کامران. (1399). ارائه الگوی کاربردی گردشگری هوشمند در مناطق شهری (مطالعه موردی: شهر اصفهان). مجله گردشگری شهری، 7(2)، 127–141. https://doi.org/10.22059/jut.2020.308582.826
  5. رضوانی، محمدرضا؛ فرجی‌سبکبار، حسنعلی؛ قدیری‌معصوم، مجتبی و زینتی‌فخرآباد، حسین. (1403). مرور نظام‌مند پژوهش‌های توسعه گردشگری هوشمند در نواحی روستایی (سال‌های 2000 تا 2022). پژوهش‌های روستایی، 15(3)، 183–199. https://doi.org/10.22059/jrur.2025.356635.1825
  6. زنگوئی، فرنوش؛ خرازی‌محمدوندی‌آذر، زهرا و صالحی‌صدقیانی، جمشید. (1399). شناسایی مؤلفه‌های هوشمندسازی صنعت گردشگری در ایران. مطالعات مدیریت کسب‌وکار هوشمند، 8(32)، 239–272. https://doi.org/10.22054/IMS.2020.47173.1607
  7. صفری‌علی‌اکبری، مسعود. (1401). تحلیل بستر گردشگری هوشمند در روستاهای هدف گردشگری و موانع پیش‌رو (مطالعه موردی: شهرستان پاوه). روستا و توسعه پایدار فضا، 2(4)، 46–64. https://dor.isc.ac/dor/20.1001.1.2717350.1401.3.4.3.7.1401.3.4.3.7
  8. عنابستانی، علی‌اکبر و بارانی‌علی‌اکبری، سجاد. (1403). تحلیل فضایی عوامل مؤثر بر شکل‌گیری رهیافت گردشگری هوشمند روستایی (مطالعه موردی: روستاهای هدف گردشگری شرق استان کرمانشاه). برنامه‌ریزی فضایی، 14(3)، 87–114. https://doi.org/10.22108/sppl.2024.141126.178282
  9. عنابستانی، علی‌اکبر؛ ذوالفقاری، مرتضی و توکلی‌نیا، جمیله. (1403). تحلیل عوامل مؤثر بر شکل‌گیری رویکرد روستای هوشمند در ایران. مطالعات جغرافیایی مناطق خشک، 15(56)، 46–69. https://doi.org/10.22034/jargs.2023.402096.1039039
  10. شفیعی، ساناز؛ رجب‌زاده‌قطرمی، علی؛ حسن‌زاده، علیرضا و جهانیان، سعید. (1396). بررسی تأثیر فناوری اطلاعات بر توسعه پایدار مقاصد گردشگری به‌منظور توسعه مقاصد گردشگری هوشمند (با استفاده از رویکرد فراترکیب). تحقیقات بازاریابی نوین، 42(3)، 151–170. https://doi.org/10.1080/17477778.2022.203065656
  11. Atkočiūnienė, V., & Vaznonienė, G. (2019). Smart village development principles and driving forces: the case of Lithuania. European Countryside, 11(4), 497-516. http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/euco-2019-0028
  12. Aziiza, A. A., Sulistiyani, E., & Fitri, A. S. (2023). What is the Element of the Smart Village Model?: Domains, aspects and indicators. INTENSIF: Journal Ilmiah Penelitian dan Penerapan Teknologi Sistem Informasi, 7(1), 146-160. http://dx.doi.org/10.29407/intensif.v7i1.18898
  13. Azis, N., Amin, M., Chan, S., & Aprilia, C. (2020). How smart tourism technologies affect tourist destination loyalty. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Technology, 11(4), 603-625. DOI:10.1108/jhtt-01-2020-0005. [In Persian]
  14. Ciolac, R., Iancu, T., Popescu, G., Adamov, T., Feher, A., & Stanciu, S. (2022). Smart tourist village —an entrepreneurial necessity for maramures rural area. Sustainability, 14(14), 8914. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14148914
  15. Constantin Profiroiu, M. & Valentina Radulescu, C. (2019). Local development opportunities in the context of sustainable development by applying the concept of "smart village" in Romania. Proceedings of the 13th international management conference "Management Strategies for High Performance" Bucharest, Romania.
  16. Danuta, G. D. (2018). Intelligent development of the countryside–the concept of smart villages: assumptions, possibilities and implementation limitations. Economic and Regional Studies/Studia Ekonomiczne i Regionalne, 11(3), 32-49. https://doi.org/10.2478/ers-2018-0023
  17. Ella, S., & Andari, R. N. (2018, October). Developing a smart village model for village development in Indonesia. In 2018 International Conference on ICT for Smart Society (ICISS) (pp. 1-6). IEEE
  18. Harrison, M., E. Stanwyck, B. Beckingham, O. Starry, B. Hanlone, and J. Ewcomerc. (2011). Smart Growth and the Septic Tank: WastewaterTreatment and Growth Management in the Baltimore Region, Land Use Policy, 29, 483– 492.
  19. Hidayah, N., Suherlan, H., Putra, F. K. K., Hdayah, N., Suherlan, H., & Putra, F. (2022). Stakeholders’ synergies in developing smart tourism destination. A Phenomenographic Study. Journal Of Environmental Management And Tourism, 13(2), 313-323. https://doi.org/10.14505/jemt.v13.2(58).02
  20. Horton, A. (1999). A simple guide to successful foresight https://doi.org/10.1108/1463668991080205
  21. Huang, C. D., Goo, J., Nam, K., & Yoo, C. W. (2017). Smart tourism technologies in travel planning: The role of exploration and exploitation. Information & Management, 54(6), 757–770. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2016.11.010.
  22. Naldi, L., Nilsson, P., Westlund, H., & Wixe, S (2015). What is smart rural development? Journal of Rural Studies, 40, 90-101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2015.06.006
  23. Nchake, M.A., & Shuaibu, M. (2022). Investment in ICT infrastructure and inclusive growth in Africa. Scientific African, 17(2), e01293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sciaf.2022.e01293
  24. Park, J. H., Lee, C., Yoo, C., & Nam, Y. (2016). An analysis of the utilization of Facebook by local Korean governments for tourism development and the network of smart tourism ecosystem. International Journal of Information Management, 36(6), 1320-1327. DOI:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2016.05.027.
  25. Su, H., & Meng, X. (2021). Research on the development of rural E-commerce based on smart tourism. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series. IOP Publishing. 1-24. http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1915/3/032007
  26. Tao, T.C.H., & Wall, G. (2009). Tourism as a Sustainable Livelihood Strategy. Tourism Management Journal, 30 (1), 90-98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2008.03.009
  27. Tu, Q., & Liu, A. (2014). Framework of smart tourism research and related progress in China. Paper presented at the International Conference on Management and Engineering (CME 2014).1-17. http://dx.doi.org/10.52255/smarttourism.2021.1.1.5
  28. Wang, A. (2020). Research on the Development of Smart Rural Tourism in Shandong Province in the Era of Internet. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series. IOP Publishing.1-16. http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1575/1/012052
  29. Wang, X., Li, X. R., Zhen, F., & Zhang, J. (2016). How smart is your tourist attraction? Measuring tourist preferences of smart tourism attractions via a FCEM-AHP and IPA approach. Tourism Management, 54, 309-320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2015.12.003
  30. Zhang, X. (2019), Research on Smart City System: Elements, Structure and Model; Economy and Management Publishing House: Beijing, China, 2019. 1-236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102092
  31. Zhao, L., & Zhang, D. (2021). Research on the path of revitalizing rural tourism from the perspective of smart tourism. In E3S Web of Conferences (Vol. 251, p. 03037). EDP Sciences.1-17. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/580/1/012064
  32. Zhu, W., & Shang, F. (2021). Rural smart tourism under the background of internet plus. Ecological Informatics, 65, 101.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoinf.2021.101424
  33. Ebrahimpour, H., Rahmati, M., & Naemati, V. (2022). Feasibility study of smart tourism development with emphasis on sustainable development (Case study: Ardabil city). Environmental Science Studies, 7(1), 4622–4631. https://doi.org/10.22034/jess.2022.145675 [in persian]
  34. Pourang, A., Pourang, N., & Ghiyour Baghbani, S. M. (2020). Presenting a model of destination-oriented factors affecting tourists' destination tendency and length of stay (Case study: Mashhad city). Journal  of Urban Tourism, 7(2), 51–69. https://doi.org/10.22059/jut.2020.290397.732 [in persian]
  35. Khavarian Garmasir, A. R., Jashni, M., Khadem, F., Shakouri, B., & Ebrahimi Tark Mahalleh, E. (2024). An analysis of the role of smart tourism technologies in memorable urban tourist experiences in Iran. Journal  of Urban Tourism, 11(4), 19–37. https://doi.org/10.22059/jut.2024.366326.1160 [in persian]
  36. Dashtlali, Z., Aligholi, M., & Nourbakhsh, S. K. (2020). A practical model of smart tourism in urban areas (Case study: Isfahan city). Journal  of Urban Tourism, 7(2), 127–141. https://doi.org/10.22059/jut.2020.308582.826 [in persian]
  37. Rezvani, M. R., Faraji-Sabkbar, H. A., Ghadiri-Masoum, M., & Zeinati-Fakhrabad, H. (2024). A systematic review of smart tourism development research in rural areas (2000–2022). Rural Research, 15(3), 183–198. https://doi.org/10.22059/jrur.2025.356635.1825 [in persian]
  38. Zangooei, F., Kharazi Mohammadvandi Azar, Z., & Salehi Sadeghiani, J. (2020). Identifying the components of smart tourism industry in Iran. Smart Business Management Studies, 8(32), 239–272. https://doi.org/10.22054/IMS.2020.47173.1607 [in persian]
  39. Safari Aliakbari, M. (2022). Analysis of the smart tourism context in target rural areas and its challenges (Case study: Paveh County). Rural and Sustainable Spatial Development, 2(4), 44–46. https://dor.isc.ac/dor/20.1001.1.2717350.1401.3.4.3.7 [in persian]
  40. Annabestani, A., & Barani Aliakbari, S. (2024). Spatial analysis of factors influencing the formation of smart rural tourism (Case study: Tourism-oriented villages in Eastern Kermanshah Province). Spatial Planning, 14(3), 87–114. https://doi.org/10.22108/sppl.2024.141126.1782 [in persian]
  41. Annabestani, A., Zolfaghari, M., & Tavakkolinia, J. (2024). An analysis of the factors affecting the formation of the smart village approach in Iran. Geographical Studies of Arid Regions, 15(56), 46–69. https://doi.org/10.22034/jargs.2023.402096.1039 [in persian]
  42. Shafiei, S., Jahaniyan, S., Khatari, A. R., & Hassanzadeh, A. (2022). Developing sustainable tourism destinations through smart technologies: A system dynamics approach. Regional Studies. Regional Science, 42, 151–170. https://doi.org/10.1080/17477778.2022.2030656 [in persian]