پژوهش های روستائی

پژوهش های روستائی

پویایی ارتباطات میان مروجان کشاورزی و کشاورزان دارای معلولیت: شواهد اجتماعی-اقتصادی

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان
مارک آرهین 1
مایکل آکواسی آنتوی 1
انوک کوامه تام-آگیکوم 2
جوآن-آرک مانو آگیاپونگ 3
1 گروه کشاورزی و سلامت دام، دانشگاه آفریقای جنوبی، پرتوریا، آفریقای جنوبی
2 گروه اقتصاد کشاورزی، تجارت و ترویج، دانشکده کشاورزی، کالج کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی
3 گروه مدیریت، دانشکده بازرگانی، دانشگاه کیپ کوست، غنا
10.22059/jrur.2024.374385.1929
چکیده
ارتباطات مؤثر میان مروجان کشاورزی (AEAs) برای انتشار اطلاعات، پذیرش فناوری‌های جدید و بهبود کلی شیوه‌های کشاورزی ضروری است. با این حال، پویایی ارتباطات ممکن است هنگام تعامل با کشاورزان دارای معلولیت (FWDs)، که اغلب با چالش‌ها و موانع منحصربه‌فردی در دسترسی به اطلاعات و منابع مواجه هستند، به طور قابل‌توجهی متفاوت باشد. در این مطالعه، پویایی ارتباطات موجود میان مروجان کشاورزی و کشاورزان دارای معلولیت را بررسی می‌کنیم. از یک مطالعه مقطعی استفاده کردیم و داده‌ها را از ۳۸۶ کشاورز دارای معلولیت که از تمام ۱۶ منطقه غنا انتخاب شده بودند، جمع‌آوری نمودیم. برای تحلیل داده‌ها از آمار توصیفی و استنباطی استفاده شد. نتایج نشان می‌دهد که مروجان ترویج، منبع اصلی اطلاعات برای کشاورزان دارای معلولیت هستند (۱۸٪). ارتباطات میان کشاورزان دارای معلولیت و مروجان کشاورزی، تجربه‌ای نسبتاً کمتر از حد رضایت‌بخش را آشکار می‌سازد (۵۷٪). سن (۱٪)، جنسیت (۵٪)، نوع معلولیت (۱٪)، منشأ معلولیت (۱٪)، عضویت در سازمان‌های مبتنی بر کشاورزان (۱٪)، فعالیت غیرکشاورزی (۵٪) و تجربه در کشاورزی (۱٪) همگی به‌عنوان عوامل معنادار شکل‌دهنده به پویایی ارتباطات میان کشاورزان دارای معلولیت و مروجان ترویج ظاهر می‌شوند. مروجان ترویج باید در زمینه راهبردهای ارتباطی فراگیر و آگاهی از معلولیت آموزش ببینند تا به دانش و مهارت لازم برای تعامل مؤثر با کشاورزان دارای معلولیت، پاسخگویی به نیازهای متنوع آنان و ارائه کمک و اطلاعات متناسب مجهز شوند.
کلیدواژه‌ها
معلولیت
مروجان ترویج
بروشورها
منشأ معلولیت
تلویزیون
موضوعات

عنوان مقاله English

Communication Dynamics between Agricultural Extension Agents and Farmers with Disabilities: The Socio-Economic Evidence

نویسندگان English

Mark Arhin 1
Michael Akwasi Antwi 1
Enoch Kwame Tham-Agyekum 2
Joan-Ark Manu Agyapong 3
1 Department of Agriculture and Animal Health, University of South Africa, Pretoria, South Africa
2 Department of Agricultural Economics, Agribusiness and Extension Faculty of Agriculture College of Agriculture and Natural Resources, KNUST
3 Department of Management, School of Business, University of Cape Coast, Ghana
چکیده English

A B S T R A C T
Effective communication between agricultural extension agents (AEAs) is essential for the dissemination of information, adoption of new technologies, and overall improvement of agricultural practices. However, the communication dynamics may vary significantly when interacting with farmers with disabilities (FWDs), who often face unique challenges and barriers to accessing information and resources. In this study, we explore the dynamics of communication that exist between AEAs and FWDs. We used a cross-sectional study and collected data from 386 FWDs who were selected from all the 16 regions in Ghana. We used both descriptive and inferential statistics to analyse the data. Results show that extension officers are the primary source of information for FWDs (18%). The communication between FWDs and agricultural agents reveals a rather less than satisfactory experience (57%). Age (1%), gender (5%), type of disability (1%), source of disability (1%), Farmer Based Oorganisation membership (1%), non-farm activity (5%), and experience in farming (1%) all emerge as significant factors shaping communication dynamics between farmers with disabilities and extension agents. Extension officers should receive training on inclusive communication strategies and disability awareness so that they will be equipped with the knowledge and skills to effectively engage with FWDs, accommodate their diverse needs, and provide tailored assistance and information

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Disability
Extension officers
Leaflets
Source of disability
Television.
  1. Abate, G. T., Abay, K. A., Chamberlin, J., Kassim, Y., Spielman, D. J., & Tabe-Ojong, M. P. (2023). Digital tools and agricultural market transformation in Africa: Why are they not at scale yet, and what will it take to get there? Food Policy, 116, 102439.
  2. Agole, D., Baggett, C. D., Brennan, M. A., Ewing, J. C., Yoder, E. P., Makoni, S. B., Beckman, M. D., & Epeju, W. F. (2021). Determinants of participation of young farmers with and without disability in agricultural capacity-building programs designed for the public in Uganda. Sustainable Agriculture Research, 10(2), 74-86.
  3. Agyei-Okyere, E., Nketsia, W., Opoku, M. P., Torgbenu, E. L., Alupo, B. A., & Odame, L. (2019). Sustainable employment opportunities for persons with disabilities in Ghana: Exploring perceptions and participation in agriculture. Business Strategy and Development, 2(2), 68-76. https://doi.org/10.1002/bsd2.43
  4. Akintonde, J. O., Akintaro, O. S., Oladipo, S. O., Rahman, S. B., Akintaro, O. S., Oladosu, I. O., & Ogunwale, A. B. (2021). Perceived effects of village extension agents' communication skills in training farmers on extension recommendations in Surulere Local Government Area of Oyo State, Nigeria. International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, 11(9).
  5. Anang, B. T., Asante, B. O., Tham-Agyekum, E. K., Ankuyi, F., Asiedu, P., Oduro-Owusu, A. Y., Okorley, E. L., Prah, S., Bakang, J. E. A., & Amoako, P. (2023). Demand for and intensity of use of extension services among cocoa farmers in Ghana: The Heckpoisson approach. International Journal of Humanities Education and Social Sciences, 3(3). https://doi.org/10.55227/ijhess.v3i3.767
  6. Anang, B. T., Bäckman, S., & Sipiläinen, T. (2020). Adoption and income effects of agricultural extension in northern Ghana. Scientific African, 7.
  7. Bujang, M. A. (2021). A step-by-step process on sample size determination for medical research. Malaysian Journal of Medical Sciences, 28(2), 15-27.
  8. Chisala, M., & Mkandawire, P. N. (2023). An interpretive phenomenological study on lived experiences of smallholder farmers with disabilities. EPRA International Journal of Agriculture and Rural Economic Research, 11(10).
  9. Danjumah, P. M., Asiamah, M. T., Tham-Agyekum, E. K., Ibraham, S. A., & Mensah, L. K. (2024). Dynamics of agricultural extension delivery services to rice farmers in Ghana. Heliyon, 10(5), e26753.
  10. Devkota, R., Hambly Odame, H., Fitzsimons, J., Pudasaini, R., & Raizada, M. N. (2020). Evaluating the effectiveness of picture-based agricultural extension lessons developed using participatory testing and editing with smallholder women farmers in Nepal. Sustainability, 12(22), 9699.
  11. Eide, A. H., & Ingstad, B. (2018). Disability and poverty: Reflections on research experiences in Africa and beyond. African Journal of Disability, 2(1), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.4102/ajod.v2i1.31
  12. Gomda, A., Sulemana, N., & Zakaria, H. (2021). Determinants of form of participation of persons with disabilities in agriculture: The case of disabled farmers in the Savelugu/Nanton Municipality. ADRRI Journal of Agriculture and Food Sciences, 4(7), 1-24. https://doi.org/10.55058/adrrijafs.v4i7(4).604
  13. GSS. (2020). 2017/2018 Ghana Census of Agriculture National Report. Ghana Statistical Service.
  14. Hammell, K. (2021). Occupation in natural environments: Health equity and environmental justice. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 88(4), 319-328. https://doi.org/10.1177/00084174211040000
  15. Hammond, R., Tham-Agyekum, E. K., Ankuyi, F., Aidoo, D. C., Osei, J. E., Osei, C., Bakang, J. A., & Awuah-Frimpong, R. (2023). Analysing cocoa farmers' perception on the use of print media for extension delivery in Adansi Asokwa, Ghana. Russian Journal of Agricultural and Socio-Economic Sciences, 5(137).
  16. Ior, N., Sheshi, N., & Leo, N. (2021). Communal conflicts occurrence and effects on farmers' access to agricultural extension services in Benue and Nasarawa States, North-central Nigeria. Journal of Agricultural Science and Development, 2(4), 125-133. https://doi.org/10.59331/jasd.v4i2.215
  17. Kamara, A., Conteh, A., Rhodes, E. R., & Cooke, R. A. (2019). The relevance of smallholder farming to African agricultural growth and development. African Journal of Food Agriculture Nutrition and Development, 19(1), 14043-14065. https://doi.org/10.18697/ajfand.84.BLFB1010
  18. Kigatiira, K. K. (2019). The effect of shared meaning between extension officers and farmers on the adoption of Irish potato farming innovations in Meru County, Kenya [Doctoral dissertation, JKUAT-COHRED].
  19. Lawson, A., & Beckett, A. E. (2020). The social and human rights models of disability: Towards a complementarity thesis. The International Journal of Human Rights, 25(2), 348-379. https://doi.org/10.1080/13642987.2020.1783533
  20. Lowder, S. K., Sánchez, M. V., & Bertini, R. (2021). Which farms feed the world and has farmland become more concentrated? World Development, 142, 105455.
  21. Maake, M. M. S., & Antwi, M. A. (2022). Farmer's perceptions of effectiveness of public agricultural extension services in South Africa: An exploratory analysis of associated factors. Agriculture & Food Security, 11(1), 34.
  22. Mairiga, J., Momodu, H., Orji, P. O., Halima, M., & Roseline, P. O. (2019). Communication strategies for enhancing women participation in sustainable agriculture development in Nigeria: A critical review. South Asian Research Journal of Agriculture and Fisheries, 1(4).
  23. Miller, J. (2019). The European disability rights revolution. European Law Review, 44(1), 66-69.
  24. Minus, K., Woods, J., Roberts, R., English, C., & Rodriguez, B. (2021). Empowering the caregiver network of farmers with a disability: A case study of the North Carolina AgrAbility project. Advancements in Agricultural Development, 2(1), 95-106.
  25. Oliver, M. (2019). A new model in the social work role in relation to disability. In J. Campling (Ed.), The handicapped person: A new perspective for social workers. RADAR. https://disability-studies.leeds.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/sites/40/library/Campling-handicppaed.pdf
  26. Pundlik, S., Shivshanker, P., & Luo, G. (2023). Impact of apps as assistive devices for visually impaired persons. Annual Review of Vision Science. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-vision-111022-123837
  27. Rathnachandra, D., Malkanyhi, P., & Sivashankar, P. (2022). Present situation of agricultural information needs and accessibility of women farmers in Imbulpe DS Division in Sri Lanka. International Journal of Agriculture Environment and Food Sciences, 6(2), 319-326.
  28. Ricciardi, V., Mehrabi, Z., Wittman, H., James, D., & Ramankutty, N. (2021). Higher yields and more biodiversity on smaller farms. Nature Sustainability.
  29. Sango, P., Bello, M., Deveau, R., Gager, K., Boateng, B., Ahmed, H., … & Azam, M. (2022). Exploring the role and lived experiences of people with disabilities working in the agricultural sector in Northern Nigeria. African Journal of Disability, 11. https://doi.org/10.4102/ajod.v11i0.897
  30. Schaffernicht, S. (2023). A social-ecological model for inclusion processes in urban agriculture of Vienna, Austria. Merits, 2(3), 415-431.
  31. Siddiqua, K. A., Islam, R., & Afrin, S. (2017). Disability, employment and poverty: A study of the physically handicapped people in Dhaka City. ME-JAA Middle East Journal of Age and Ageing.
  32. Solanki, S., & Verma, S. (2019). A study of the use of information & communication technology in disseminating farm information to farmers in India. In Proceedings of International Conference on Sustainable Computing in Science, Technology and Management (SUSCOM). Amity University Rajasthan.
  33. Tham-Agyekum, E. K., Appiah, A., Ankuyi, F., Sangber-Dery, G.-M., Antwi, C., Acheampong, K. O., Akolgo, T., Adesah, T., & Bakang, J.-E. A. (2023). Exploring gender inequalities and promoting equal opportunities in Ghana's cocoa industry using Harvard Analytical Framework. International Journal of Humanities Education and Social Sciences, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.55227/ijhess.v3i2.435
  34. Tham-Agyekum, E. K., Boansi, D., Wongnaa, C. A., Ankuyi, F., Awunyo-Vitor, D., Andivi Bakang, J. E., & Acheampong, A. O. (2023). A gender differential analysis of determinants of pesticide application in cocoa system farming of Ghana. Cogent Social Sciences, 9(2). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2023.2256512
  35. Ton, K. T., Gaillard, J. C., Adamson, C., et al. (2020). An empirical exploration of the capabilities of people with disabilities in coping with disasters. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 11, 602-614.
  36. Trafford, Z., van der Westhuizen, E., McDonald, S., Linegar, M., & Swartz, L. (2021). More than just assistive devices: How a South African social enterprise supports an environment of inclusion. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(5), 2655.
  37. UNESCO. (2018). Education and disability: Analysis of data from 49 countries (Information Paper No. 49). http://uis.unesco.org/en/news/education-and-disability-analysis-data-49-countries
پژوهش های روستائی
دوره 17، شماره 2
تابستان 1405
صفحه 1-14

  • تاریخ دریافت 28 فروردین 1405
  • تاریخ بازنگری 14 خرداد 1405
  • تاریخ پذیرش 18 تیر 1405