تحلیل پویایی انسجام سازمانی در اجرای طرح آبادانی و پیشرفت روستایی (موردمطالعه: شهرستان گچساران)

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 فارغ‌التحصیل دکتری، گروه مدیریت دولتی، دانشکده مدیریت، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران.

2 استاد، گروه احیاء مناطق خشک و کوهستانی، دانشکده منابع طبیعی، دانشگاه تهران، کرج، ایران.

3 دانشیار، گروه جغرافیای انسانی و برنامه‌ریزی، دانشکده جغرافیا، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران.

4 دانشجوی دکتری، گروه احیاء مناطق خشک و کوهستانی، دانشکده منابع طبیعی، دانشگاه تهران، کرج، ایران.

چکیده

وجود ساختار منسجم سازمانی برای دستیابی به تلاش‌های هماهنگ، برنامه‌ریزی جامع منابع، و بهبود نتایج حکمرانی محلی حیاتی است. همچنین پویایی قدرتی که پاسخ‌های حکمرانی کارآمد را ایجاد کند، می‌تواند موجب تاب‌آوری نظام اجتماعی-بوم‌شناختی شود. در این پژوهش، پویایی انسجام سازمانی دست‌اندرکاران سازمانی مرتبط با طرح‌ آبادانی و پیشرفت منظومه‌های روستایی در شهرستان گچساران، به‌عنوان پایلوت برای ارزیابی حکمرانی مؤثر محلی بررسی شد. تحلیل شبکه تبادل اطلاعات و همکاری در بین این دست‌اندرکاران در دو بازه زمانی قبل و بعد از اجرای این طرح، با استفاده از روش تحلیل شبکه اجتماعی صورت گرفت. برای این منظور شاخص مرکزیت بینابینی در سطح خرد و شاخص‌های تراکم، تمرکز و میانگین فاصله ژئودزیک در سطح کلان شبکه، سنجش شد. نتایج نشان داد در قبل از اجرای طرح، سازمان‌های فرمانداری، صندوق کارآفرینی امید و فنی و حرفه‌ای و بعد از اجرای طرح فرمانداری، میراث فرهنگی و صندوق کارآفرینی امید به‌عنوان کنشگران با بالاترین مرکزیت بینابینی، دارای نقش مهم در کنترل جریان اطلاعات و منابع هستند. نتایج کلی شاخص مرکزیت بینابینی، نشان‌دهنده بهبود جریان اطلاعات و توزیع نقش‌های کلیدی در شبکه است، که به افزایش کارایی و هماهنگی سازمان‌ها منجر شده است. همچنین، نتایج شاخص‌های کلان شبکه نشان‌دهنده افزایش انسجام شبکه روابط و کاهش تمرکز و افزایش سرعت گردش اطلاعات در شبکه نسبت به قبل از اجرای طرح است. رویکرد انجام‌شده در این پژوهش می‌تواند به‌عنوان الگویی برای سایر مناطق نیز استفاده شود و به بهبود حکمرانی محلی کمک کند. 

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله [English]

Dynamic Analysis of Organizational Cohesion in the Implementation of the Development and Advancement Rural Plan (Case Study: Gachsaran County)

نویسندگان [English]

  • Hassan Ashtari 1
  • Mehdi Ghorbani 2
  • Mohammad Amin Khorasani 3
  • Sedigheh Ghafari 4
1 PhD Graduated, Department of Public Administration, Faculty of Management, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.
2 Professor, Department of Reclamation of Arid and Mountainous Regions, Faculty of Natural Resources, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.
3 Assistant Professor, Department of Human Geography and Planning, Faculty of Geography, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.
4 PhD Candidate, Department of Reclamation of Arid and Mountainous Regions, Faculty of Natural Re-sources, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.
چکیده [English]

A cohesive organizational structure is essential for coordinated efforts, effective resource planning, and enhanced governance outcomes. Additionally, dynamic power that enables efficient governance responses can enhance the resilience of socioal-ecological systems. This study aims to explore the organizational cohesion among stakeholders in the Development and Advancement Plan of Rural Constellations in Gachsaran County County, which serves as a pilot area for assessing effective local gov-ernance. The information exchange and cooperation among these stakeholders were analyzed using social network analysis methods, contrasting the results before and after the project's implementation. To achieve this, the betweenness centrality index at the micro level, along with the density, centralization, and average geodesic distance indices at the macro level of the network, were measured. The findings showed that before the implementation of the project, the Governorate, the Omid Entrepreneurship Fund, and Technical and Vocational Training had the highest betweenness centrality, playing significant roles in controlling the flow of information and resources. After the project's implementation, the Governorate, Cultural Heritage and Tourism, and the Omid Entrepreneurship Fund were identified as the key actors with the highest betweenness centrality. The average betweenness centrality index indicated improved information flow and a more balanced distribution of key roles within the network, leading to increased efficiency and coordination among organizations. The macro-level network indices showed increased cohesion, reduced centralization, and faster information circu-lation compared to before the project's implementation. This study's approach can be applied to other regions to enhance local governance.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Social network analysis
  • Institutional cohesion
  • Social-ecological system
  • Local governance
  • Between-ness centrality
Aburto, J. A., Stotz, W. B., & Cundill, G. (2014). Social-ecological collapse: TURF govern-ance in the context of highly variable resources in Chile. Ecology and society, 19(1).
Afkhami, M., Ghorbani, M., Zahraie, B., Azadi, H. (2021). Role of Social Network Measurements in Improving Adaptive Capacity: The Case of Agricultural Water Users in Rural Areas of Western Iran. Society Natural Resources, 34(10), 1338-1357.‏
Adger, W. N. (2000). Social and ecological resilience: are they related? Progress in human geography, 24(3), 347-364.
Armitage, D., Berkes, F., Doubleday, N. (2007). Adaptive Co-Management: Collabora-tion, Learning, And Multi-Level Governance. University Of British Columbia Press, 344 Pages.
Armitage, D., Berkes, F., Dale, A., Kocho-Schellenberg, E., & Patton, E. (2011). Co-management and the co-production of knowledge: Learning to adapt in Canada's Arctic. Global environmental change, 21(3), 995-1004.
Avazpour, L., Ghorbani, M., Naderi, A., Fakhar Izadi, N., Azadi, H., & Yazdanparast, M. (2024). Dryland co-management in Kerman province, Iran: a dynamic analysis of social net-works. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 1-21. 
Bae, S.-H., Nikolaev, A., Seo, J.Y., Castner, J. (2015). Health Care Provider Social Network Analysis: A Systematic Review. Nurs. Outlook 63, 566–584. 
Biggs, R., Schlüter, M., Biggs, D., Bohensky, E. L., BurnSilver, S., Cundill, G.,... & West, P. C. (2012). Toward principles for enhancing the resilience of ecosystem services. Annual re-view of environment and resources, 37, 421-448.‏
Bodin, Ö., & Crona, B. I. (2009). The role of social networks in natural resource governance: What relational patterns make a difference? Global environmental change, 19(3), 366-374.
Bodin, O., Prell, C. (2011). Social Networks and Natural Resource Management: Uncover-ing the Social Fabric of Environmental Governance. Cambridge University Press.
Boyd, E., & Folke, C. (Eds.). (2011). Adapting institutions: governance, complexity and so-cial-ecological resilience. Cambridge University Press.
Cramer, M. E., Araz, O. M., Wendl, M. J. (2017). Social Networking in An Agricultural Re-search Center: Using Data to Enhance Outcomes. Journal Of Agromedicine, 22(2), 170-179.
Davidson, J. L., Jacobson, C., Lyth, A., Dedekorkut-Howes, A., Baldwin, C. L., Ellison, J. C.,... & Smith, T. F. (2016). Interrogating resilience: toward a typology to improve its opera-tionalization. Ecology and society, 21(2).
Es’haghi, S. R., Karamidehkordi, E. (2023). Understanding The Structure of Stakeholders− Projects Network in Endangered Lakes Restoration Programs Using Social Network Analy-sis. Environmental Science Policy, 140, 172-188.
Fabinyi, M., Evans, L., & Foale, S. J. (2014). Social-ecological systems, social diversity, and power: insights from anthropology and political ecology. Ecology and society, 19(4).
Furmankiewicz, M., Macken-Walsh, Á., & Stefańska, J. (2014). Territorial governance, net-works and power: cross-sectoral partnerships in rural poland. Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography, 96(4), 345-361.
Gain, A.K., Hossain, S., Benson, D., Di Baldassarre, G., Giupponi, C., Huq, N. (2021). So-cial-Ecological System Approaches for Water Resources Management. Int. J. Sustain.
Ghorbani, M. (2014). The Report of National Project: Social Network Analysis; Modeling, Policymaking and Implementation of Natural Resources Co-Management (Vol. 1), University of Tehran (In Persian).
Ghorbani, M., Azadi, H., Janečková, K., Sklenička, P., Witlox, F. (2021). Sustainable Co-Management of arid regions in southeastern Iran: Social network analysis approach. Journal of Arid Environments, 192, 104540.
Ghorbani, M., Nasiri, S., Haj Alizadeh, A. (2019). Analysis of organizational cohesion dy-namics towards establishing watershed governance: A case study in Sarayan County, South Khorasan. Watershed Engineering and Management journal, 11(4), 879-890. (In Persian).
Hirschi, C. (2010). Strengthening Regional Cohesion: Collaborative Networks and Sustainable Development in Swiss Rural Areas. Journal of Ecology and Society. 15(4). 16. 
Holling, C. S. (1973). Resilience and stability of ecological systems. Annual review of ecolo-gy and systematics, 4(1), 1-23.
Ingalls, M. L. (2017). Not just another variable: untangling the spatialities of power in social–ecological systems. Ecology and Society, 22(3).
Janssen, M. A., Anderies, J. M., & Ostrom, E. (2007). Robustness of social-ecological sys-tems to spatial and temporal variability. Society and Natural Resources, 20(4), 307-322.
Johnson, E. M., & Chew, R. (2021). Social network analysis methods for international devel-opment. RTI Press.
Kingsford, R. T., Bino, G., & Porter, J. L. (2017). Continental impacts of water development on waterbirds, contrasting two Australian river basins: Global implications for sustainable wa-ter use. Global change biology, 23(11), 4958-4969.
Knoke, D., & Yang, S. (2008). Social network analysis (No. 154). Sage.‏
Lin, H., Zhu, Y., Zhou, J., Mu, B., & Liu, C. (2023). Understanding stakeholder relationships in sustainable brownfield regeneration: a combined FAHP and SNA approach. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 1-37.
Mahdavi, A., Jalalabadi, L. (2022). Identification of Key Effective Drivers the Sustainable Development of Shahr-e Babak Rural System with a Futures studies Approach. Village and Space Sustainable Development, 3(3), 58-82 (In Persian).
McIlwain, L., Baird, J., Baldwin, C., Pickering, G., & Manathunga, C. (2024). Structural Power Dynamics in Polycentric Water Governance Networks. Society & Natural Resources, 37(3), 402-427.‏
Meteorological Organization of Kohgiluyeh and Boyer-Ahmad Province. (n.d.). Average an-nual rainfall amount. Retrieved May 10. (2024), from https://www.kbmet.ir/pages.php?pageid=24.
Morrison, T. H., Adger, W. N., Brown, K., Lemos, M. C., Huitema, D., & Hughes, T. P. (2017). Mitigation and adaptation in polycentric systems: sources of power in the pursuit of collective goals. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 8(5), e479.
Morrison-Smith, S., Ruiz, J. (2020). Challenges And Barriers in Virtual Teams: A Literature Review. SN Appl. Sci. 2, 1096.
Motavaseli, M., Zabiri, H. (2013). Social Cohesion, the Origin of Economic Development. Local Development, 2(5), 49-74 (In Persian).
Naderi, M., Ghorbani, M., Yavari, A. (2014). Network Analysis of Information Exchange and Key Actors in Policy-making and Sustainable Management of Sarkeh-Hesar National Park. Journal of Environmental Studies, University of Tehran (In Persian).
Natural Disasters Research Institute. (2023). Rural Development and the Advancement of Rural Constellation Plan. [Online] Available at: https://ndri.ac.ir/rural-development-07 (In Persian).
Omondiagbe, H.A., Towns, D.R., Wood, J.K., Bollard-Breen, B. (2017). Stakeholders And Social Networks Identify Potential Roles of Communities in Sustainable Management of In-vasive Species. Biol. Invasions 19, 3037–3049. 
Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective ac-tion. Cambridge university press.
Pahl-Wostl, C. (2015). Water Governance in The Face of Global Change. Switzerland: Springer.
Peng, Y., Peng, X., Li, X., Lu, M., & Yin, M. (2023). Effectiveness in Rural Governance: In-fluencing Factors and Driving Pathways—Based on 20 Typical Cases of Rural Governance in China. Land, 12(7), 1452.
Plummer, R., & Baird, J. (2021). The emergence of water resilience: an introduction. Water resilience: management and governance in times of change, 3-19.‏
Provan, K. G., Fish, A., & Sydow, J. (2007). Interorganizational networks at the network level: A review of the empirical literature on whole networks. Journal of management, 33(3), 479-516.
Rahimi, M., Ghorbani, M., & Azadi, H. (2023). Structural characteristics of governmental and non-governmental institutions network: case of water governance system in Kor River basin in Iran. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 25(7), 7029-7045.
Reyers, B., Folke, C., Moore, M. L., Biggs, R., & Galaz, V. (2018). Social-ecological systems insights for navigating the dynamics of the Anthropocene. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 43, 267-289.
Salari, F. (2014). Modeling And Analysis of Watershed Network in Resin Watershed in Kermanshah (Master's Thesis). Department Of Natural Resources, University of Tehran (In Persian). 
Sandstrom, A., & Rova, C. (2010). The Network Structure of Adaptive Governance a Sin-gle Case Study of a Fish Management Area. International Journal of Co-Management, Uni-versity of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor.
Scoones, I. (2013). Livelihoods perspectives and rural development. In Critical perspectives in rural development studies (pp. 159-184). Routledge.
Scott, J., (2014). A Matter of Record: Documentary Sources in Social Research. John Wiley Sons.
Scott, M. (2015). Re-Theorizing Social Network Analysis and Environmental Governance: Insights from Human Geography. Progress In Human Geography, 39(4), 449-463.
Sommerville, P., Former, R., Bunger, A., & Hempflin, C. (2015). Organizational network analysis: Nicaragua workforce development system. In: Washington, DC: LINC Local LLC.
Tolera, T., Senbeta, F. (2023). A Social Network Analysis of Collaborative Rangelands Gov-ernance: The case of Borana Rangelands, Southern Ethiopia. Human Ecology, 51(3), 429-437.
UNESCO World Water Assessment Program (WWAP). (2020). United Nations world water development report: water and climate change. Paris, France: UNESCO. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000372985
Vitousek, P. M., Ehrlich, P. R., Ehrlich, A. H., & Matson, P. A. (1986). Human appropriation of the products of photosynthesis. BioScience, 36(6), 368-373.
Zahermand, S., Vafaeian, M., Bazyar, M. H. (2021). Ability of alfalfa plant to refine soil con-taminated with nickel and lead. Environmental Science and Technology, 23(6), 1-14.
Zheng, X., Sun, C., & Liu, J. (2024). Exploring stakeholder engagement in urban village ren-ovation projects through a mixed-method approach to social network analysis: a case study of Tianjin. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11(1), 1-15.