Study of the Foundations of the Differentiation of Time and Space from the Perspective of Indigenous Knowledge of Users of Summer Pastures: A case study Rangelands of the Qaleh Miran Region, Golestan Province

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

Rangeland Department, Faculty of Rangeland and Watershed Management, University of Natural Resources and Agricultural Sciences, Gorgan, Iran

Abstract

A B S T R A C T
Villagers and nomads have a long history of place-based living and long-standing traditions that produce complex knowledge systems about the world and their surroundings. These complex knowledge and activities are indigenous, local, or traditional. This knowledge encompasses various fields, one of which is ethnoecology. Ethnoecology includes a broad perspective from which one can understand the resources of the living environment and sustainable management from the viewpoint of indigenous people. In this research, the knowledge of local communities in the Qaleh-Miran region was studied and examined to understand the components and environmental factors and classify them. The necessary information for the research was collected from individuals through semi-structured interviews and participatory observation. The interviews were conducted purposefully with local experts, and to better understand their statements, permission was obtained to record their voices during the conversation. Overall, this research showed that the local people of this region have a particular expertise in recognizing the components and elements of their natural environment and using them. They use specific terms for each component, which are unwritten and oral, and recognize factors such as temperature, climate, surface landforms, elevation, land use, soil type, vegetation cover, types of roads, sun exposure and shade, geographical directions, and other factors and classify each component into different categories, using them in their daily lives.
 
Extended Abstract
Introduction
Indigenous knowledge is a collection of knowledge, practices, and beliefs. This knowledge originates from real needs, environmental possibilities, and limitations and is created through the interaction and harmony of indigenous people with their surroundings. This knowledge defines and classifies phenomena in specific physical, natural, and social environments. In fact, local people in various regions utilize it to meet their needs. These systems of knowledge and activities have been transmitted orally, through culture, rituals, and customs, experiential learning based on location, and recently in written form from generation to generation. It can be said that neglecting this knowledge leads to the destruction of the environment globally. One of the systems of indigenous knowledge is the classification of the components of place and environment based on the needs and living conditions in the place of residence, known as ethnoecology. This knowledge emphasizes the role of human understanding and cognition in systematic and regulated interaction with nature and encompasses a broad perspective that can be used to understand the resources of the living environment and sustainable management from the viewpoint of indigenous people. Overall, this field can be considered an interdisciplinary study of the dynamic relationships between people, living beings, and the environment, facilitating and creating a multi-faceted relationship between indigenous people and policymakers. It can also significantly help in understanding contemporary issues such as water scarcity, biodiversity loss, climate change, and land degradation.
 
Methodology
Free and semi-structured interviews and participatory observation methods were used to conduct this research. Information was collected, and interviews were conducted repeatedly from spring 2022 to summer 2023 in the region. All interviews were purposefully conducted with local experts. The initial identification of these individuals was facilitated by the researcher being a native, but to collect accurate information, the snowball method was used to select these individuals. Interviews on each topic continued until no new information was added to previous ones. Thus, the quality of the interviews was confirmed by the repetition of similar responses from different interviewees. In this study, a total of 40 people were interviewed, including 28 men and 12 women, with ages ranging from 35 to 87 years. Most interviews were conducted in the natural environment of the indigenous people during observation and participation, as this facilitated a better understanding of the respondents’ statements and made it easier for the researcher to record this information. Additionally, to shorten the interview time and prevent respondent fatigue, their voices were recorded with their permission, which allowed their information to be documented in both written and audio-visual formats.
 
Results and discussion
The results of the research conducted in the Qaleh-Miran region indicate that the local people of this area have particular expertise in recognizing the components and elements of their natural environment and using them. They know all these components well and assign specific names and classifications to each. These names have special meanings for them, all rooted in the culture and beliefs of the local communities of this region, learned from their ancestors. It was also found that the people of this region classify the components of their environment into different categories based on various factors such as temperature, climate, land surface features, elevation, land use, soil type, sun exposure, vegetation cover, types of roads, geographical directions, and the availability of conditions for agriculture and livestock maintenance or grazing. Another result of this research is that, given the agricultural and pastoral nature of the inhabitants of this region, the role of time and calendar in their lives is more prominent than in other areas. They had daily and annual calendars for each task. For example, they considered specific times for moving livestock from warm to cold areas or vice versa, recognizing livestock activities based on weather changes, planting, and harvesting crops, determining prayer times, fasting during Ramadan, milking, and even sometimes making tools from tree wood. The most important discussion in analyzing the above findings is the deep and rich knowledge of the local people about the types of soil in their living environment. They recognize all the soils in their living environment and classify and name them based on characteristics such as color, texture, depth, moisture content, softness, or hardness.
 
Conclusion
Based on the stated points, it was found that indigenous knowledge and ethnoecology play an undeniable role in the daily activities and lives of the local people of this region. This knowledge can be considered the knowledge of utilizing resources according to ecological, cultural, and social conditions, which these people have used to meet their past and present needs. Additionally, because it results from centuries of human experience and life, it contains valuable information and is non-structured and unwritten, requiring protection and documentation to preserve these valuable treasures for future generations. Moreover, indigenous knowledge can be optimally used alongside modern knowledge, as the use of both formal and indigenous knowledge together leads to local and national development and can create a way for indigenous people to participate in this process.
 
Funding
There is no funding support.
 
Authors’ Contribution
Authors contributed equally to the conceptualization and writing of the article. All of the authors approved the content of the manuscript and agreed on all aspects of the work declaration of competing interest none.
 
Conflict of Interest
Authors declared no conflict of interest.
 
Acknowledgments
We are grateful to all the scientific consultants of this paper.

Keywords

Main Subjects


  1. Adams, J. (2017). Climate change impacts on indigenous communities. Environmental Research Letters, 12(3), 034021.
  2. Amrollahi Jalalabadi, A., Forouzeh, M. R., Barani, H. & Yeganeh, H. (2023). Indigenous knowledge of preparing local foods from rangeland wild plants (Case study: Locals of Googhar rangelands). Iranian Journal of Anthropological Research, 6(14), 369-424. (in Persian). doi: 10.22054/qjik.2021.54212.1223
  3. Berkes, F., Colding, J., & Folke, C. (2000). Rediscovery of traditional ecological knowledge as adaptive management. Ecological Applications, 10(5), 1251-1262. doi:10.1890/1051-0761(2000)010[1251:ROTEKA]2.0.CO;2
  4. Miguel, A. (2004). Linking ecologists and traditional farmers in the search for sustainable agriculture. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 2(1), 35-42. doi:10.1890/15409295(2004)002[0035:LEATFI]2.0.CO;2
  5. Cordero, C., Meve, U., & Alejandro, G. (2023). Ethnobotany and diversity of medicinal plants used among rural communities in Mina, Iloilo, Philippines: A quantitative study. Journal of Asia-Pacific Biodiversity, 16(1), 96-117. doi: 10.1016/j.japb.2022.12.003
  6. Difarkhsh, S. M. (2012). Study of indigenous knowledge (ethnobotany and ethnoecology) of the most important non-forage species (edible, medicinal, and industrial) in the Deli-Kama region (Kohgiluyeh and Boyer-Ahmad Province). Master's thesis, Faculty of Rangeland and Watershed Management, University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, Gorgan. [in Persian].
  7. Ehsani Pour, E. & Kolahi, M. (2021). Ethnobotanical study of medicinal and industrial plants in the rangelands of Chahdashi Village of Nehbandan, South Khorasan. National Conference on Rangeland Management in Iran. [in Persian].
  8. Farhadi, M. (2006). Ethnobotany of plants with a summary and examples of ethnobotany of wild plants from Kamar. Quarterly Journal of Social Sciences, 34(35), 96-41. (in Persian). dor:20.1001.1.17351162.1385.13.34.35.2.2.7
  9. Foroozeh, M. R., Hashemati, G. A., & Barani, H. (2014). Collection and ethnobotanical study of selected edible and medicinal plants in Kohgiluyeh and Boyer-Ahmad Province (Case study: Deylgan rangelands). Journal of Islamic and Iranian Traditional Medicine, 5(2), 131-139. [in Persian].
  10. Foroozeh, M. R., Hashemati, G. A., & Barani, H. (2016). Traditional knowledge of wild plant utilization for food preparation (Case study: Nomads of Deylgan rangelands). Indigenous Knowledge, 3(5), 58-23. doi: 10.22054/qjik.2017.7748.1011 [in Persian].
  11. Gerique, Andrés. (2006). An introduction to ethnoecology and ethnobotany. Integrative Assessment and Planning Methods for Sustainable Agroforestry in Humid and Semiarid Regions. Advanced Scientific Training-Loja, Ecuador. 1-20.
  12. Gorenflo, L.J., Romaine, S., Mittermeier, R.A., & Walker-Painemilla, K. (2012). Cooccurrence of linguistic and biological diversity in biodiversity hotspots and high biodiversity wilderness areas.
  13. Green, P., Smith, R., & Johnson, T. (2021). Renewable energy use in indigenous communities. Renewable Energy Journal, 56(4), 567-589. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.127.151803
  14. Johnson, M. (2018). Traditional knowledge and biodiversity conservation. Biodiversity and Conservation, 27(5), 987-1002.
  15. Hosseini, M., Forouzeh, M. R., & Barani, H. (2018). Indigenous Knowledge of Local Communities About Wild Edible Plants in the Zabr Khan Rangelands of Nishapur. Journal of Medicinal Plants, 19(70), 43-96. doi: 10.22054/qjik.2019.39847.1143 [in Persian].
  16. Hosseininia, G. H.,& Fallahi, H. (2017). Factors Affecting the Development of Rural Entrepreneurship: A Case Study on the Rural Areas of Manoojan County. Journal of Rural Research, 8(1), 22-37.
  17. Karimian, V., Safaeyan, M., & Matin Khah, S. H. (2014). Utilizing the indigenous knowledge of nomads as an appropriate strategy for optimal management of natural ecosystems. Journal of Wood and Forest Science and Technology Research, 21(4), 114-95. dor:20.1001.1.23222077.1393.21.4.6.7 [in Persian].
  18. Khan, S. W., & Khatoon, S. (2008). Ethnobotanical Studies on Some Useful Herbs of Haramosh and Bugrote Valleys in Gilgit, Northern Areas of Pakistan. Pakistan Journal of Botany, 40(1), 43-58.
  19. Khusna, U. N., Jumari, J., & Prihastanti, E. (2023). Ethnobotany of medicinal plants in the Jalawastu Cultural Village Community, Brebes, Central Java, Indonesia. Egyptian Journal of Botany, 63(2), 457-474. doi: 10.21608/ejbo.2022.166112.2156
  20. Kiasi, Y., Foroozeh, M. R., Mirdelimi, S. Z., & Niknahad, H. (2019). Ethnobotany of edible, medicinal, and industrial plant species in the Khush-Yi-Laq rangeland, Golestan Province. Indigenous Knowledge, 6(6), 204-151. doi:10.22054/qjik.2020.50142.1192[in Persian].
  21. Lee, K., & Thompson, H. (2022). Human-environment interactions in indigenous societies. Ecology and Society, 27(1), 45-60.
  22. Mirdelimi, S. Z., Hashemati, G. A., & Barani, H. (2014). Ethnobotanical and ethnoecological study of medicinal species in Kachik. Indigenous Knowledge, 1(2), 154-129. doi: 10.22054/qjik.2016.1567 [in Persian].
  23. Mirshekar, M., Ebrahimi, M., & Ajarlou, M. (2018). Ethnobotanical study and traditional uses of some medicinal plants in Khash County. Journal of Islamic and Iranian Traditional Medicine, 9(4), 361-371. [in Persian].
  24. Pearce, F. (2016). Common Ground: Securing land rights and safeguarding the earth. Oxfam International. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
  25. Qureshi, R., Bhatti, G., & Memon, R. (2010). Ethnomedicinal uses of herbs from northern part of Nara Desert, Pakistan. Pakistan Journal of Botany, 42(2), 839-851. doi: 10.1016/j.fitote.2008.03.010
  26. Ramazaniyanfar, M., & Minaeifar, A. A. (2016). Ethnobotanical Study of Medicinal Plants in Fasa County. Journal of Islamic and Iranian Traditional Medicine, 7(2), 221-231. [in Persian].
  27. Rokaya, Maan B., Mani, Shrestha, & Suresh Kumar, Ghimir. (2005). Ethnoecology of natural environment in trans-Himalayan region of west Nepal. Banko Jankari. Journal of Forestry Information for Nepal, 15(2), 33-38. doi: 10.3126/banko.v15i2.345
  28. Saadatpour, M., Barani, H., Abedi Sarvestani, A., & Foroozeh, M. R. (2017). Ethnobotanical study of medicinal plants in Saja Rood (Zanjan Province). Herbal Medicines Quarterly, 8(3), 193-185. doi:10.14196/JHD.2018.185 [in Persian].
  29. Saeedi Geraghani, H. R., Arzani, H., Ghorbani, M., & Jahaanbakhsh Goroohi, N. (2016). Analysis of the social structure and indigenous knowledge of the Mohammad Sulaimani tribe in Jiroft County. Journal of Rangeland, 10(1), 109-122. doi:10.22054/qjik.2017.17969.1045 [in Persian].
  30. sadeghloo, t., & azizi damirchiloo, A. (2015). Evaluate the effectiveness of indigenous knowledge in sustainable agricultural development (study of area: Gogtapeh rural district of Bilehsavar county). Journal of Rural Research, 6(2), 398-410. doi: 10.22059/jrur.2015.54914[in Persian].
  31. Samiei, M., &Foroozeh, M. R. (2022). Identification of indigenous knowledge of exploitation of by-products of forest dwellers of Ramyan city. Indigenous Knowledge, 9(18), 105-171. doi:10.22054/qjik.2023.70919.1341[in Persian].
  32. Shojapour, D. (2022). Study of the transfer and changes in indigenous knowledge of medicinal plants among traditional users in Iran (Case study: Qashqai nomads). Master's thesis, Faculty of Rangeland and Watershed Management, University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, Gorgan. [in Persian].
  33. Stepp, J.R. (2014). Course of Ethnoecology. University of Florida. 40p.
  34. Tripathi, S. (2019). Ethnomedicine and Future Challenges. Global Journal of Archaeology & Anthropology, 10(5), 87–90. doi: 10.19080/GJAA.2019.10.555796
  35. Zandi-Far, B. (2010). Historical Geography of Ramian County. Master's thesis, Faculty of Humanities and Department of History, Shahroud Branch, Islamic Azad University.