Assessing the Economic, Social, Environmental, and Physical Impacts of Industrial Estates on Surrounding Rural Areas: The Case Study of Central District in Boyer-Ahmad County

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

Department of Rural Development Management, Faculty of Agriculture, Yasouj University, Yasouj, Iran

Abstract

A B S T R A C T
This research thoroughly examined the various impacts of industrial estates on the economic, social, environmental, and physical dimensions of life in the rural areas surrounding Boyer-Ahmad County's Yasouj3 industrial estate, highlighting both positive and negative effects encountered. The study surveyed 1,413 household heads from both nearby and distant areas, with a random sample of 299 selected per the Bartlett sampling table. A researcher-designed questionnaire, which was validated by university experts and utilized for data collection, exhibited a reliable Cronbach's alpha coefficient ranging from 0.62 to 0.71, ensuring the credibility of the gathered information. Data analysis was conducted using SPSS 21. Factor analysis revealed three social effect factors as sense of place and economic-social security, motivation and peace, and cultural-welfare, accounting for 50.45% of the total social effects. Four economic factors, such as agricultural status, employment and income, capital status, and poverty, comprised 52.91% of the economic effects. Environmental impacts were represented by density and diversity of species, water quantity and quality, environmental quality, and health, which collectively accounted for 52.44%. Lastly, physical effects comprised pressure on local resources, road infrastructure organization, road quality, and facility access, totaling 51.14%. The Development Index indicated improved research indicators in the nearby area post-establishment of the industrial estate, achieving a relatively favorable status. Variability comparisons revealed that industrial estates most significantly impacted environmental and physical-structural indicators, with the least effect on social indicators
Extended Abstract
Introduction
Industrial estates, resulting from industrialization, serve as vital links between industry, agriculture, and rural development. Establishing these estates near rural areas is essential for societal progress, particularly in developing countries. Previous experience shows that clustering industrial units within bio-complexes fosters economic, social, environmental, and physical transformations at regional and local levels. This clustering helps address rural issues by creating complementary production flows, supporting agriculture, providing non-agricultural employment, and improving rural welfare. However, industrial areas can also negatively impact local communities. This research focuses on identifying the unknown economic, social, physical, and environmental effects of the Yasouj 3 industrial estate on the surrounding rural areas of Boyer-Ahmad county, an area that has not been comprehensively studied.
 
Methodology
This survey research aimed to assess the impacts of industrial estates on surrounding rural areas in the central district of Boyer-Ahmad County. The study involved 299 household heads from nearby and distant villages to the Yasouj 3 industrial estate, with 161 from Far-Field villages and 138 from Near-Field villages selected randomly based on the Bartlett sampling table. A researcher-developed questionnaire, validated by experts and tested for reliability, was used for data collection. The Cronbach's alpha coefficient ranged from 0.62 to 0.71, indicating good reliability. Data analysis was conducted using SPSS 21, and the Morris analytical model ranked the study's objective indicators, with the coefficient of variation (C.V.) assessing the dispersion of these indicators.
 
Results and discussion
Based on the findings of factor analysis, three factors were identified as having significant social impacts: sense of place and economic-social security in the region, motivation and peace in the region, and cultural-welfare. These factors collectively accounted for 45.50% of the overall social impacts. Additionally, four factors were identified as having significant economic impacts: agricultural status, employment and income, capital status, and poverty. These factors collectively accounted for 52.91% of the total variance of economic impacts. Four factors were also identified as having significant environmental impacts: density and diversity of species, quantity and quality of water, environmental quality, and health. These factors collectively accounted for 52.44% of the total variance of environmental impacts. Finally, four factors were identified as having significant physical impacts as pressure on local resources, organizing road infrastructure, road quality, and access to facilities. These factors collectively accounted for 51.14% of the total variance of physical impacts of establishing industrial estates in the surrounding rural areas. A one-sample t-test was used to examine the impact of industrial estates on the surrounding rural areas.
Results showed that industrialization's economic and physical-structural impacts were desirable for nearby residents, while the environmental impacts were undesirable. Specifically, in the social dimension, industrialization had a positive impact on spatial and economic-social security perception and cultural-welfare, but a negative impact on motivation and peace in the region. Regarding the economic dimension, establishing industrial estates improved the agricultural status, employment and income, and capital status while reducing poverty. A similar analysis for the physical dimension shows that industrial states led to the organizing of road infrastructure, improved the quality of transportation roads, and enhanced access to facilities, but increased pressure on resources. However, an analysis of the environmental dimension's impacts revealed that industrial states had a negative impact on the density and diversity of species, quantity and quality of water, environmental quality, and health. In the distant villages, the economic and physical impacts of industrialization were perceived positively by the residents, while the environmental impacts were negative. However, the impact of industrialization was not significant in the social dimension. Ultimately, the results obtained from the Development Index (D.I.) showed that the establishment of industry in the surrounding areas had various impacts on social, physical-structural, and environmental indicators, leading to improved social and physical-structural conditions. Nevertheless, it had an undesirable impact on the environmental situation. A comparison of the coefficient of variation (C.V.) showed that establishing industrial estates had the most significant impact on environmental and physical-structural indicators and the least on social indicators.
 
Conclusion
To mitigate industrial impacts on the environment, it is essential to develop conservation and resource management strategies. This includes maintaining species diversity, improving environmental quality, and prioritizing health in planning and policy-making. Implementing strict laws and monitoring industrial activities is crucial. Due to unsatisfactory environmental conditions, improving social and physical infrastructure based on regional needs is also necessary. The study highlights the need for increased attention to environmental issues and research across social, physical, and environmental areas. Its findings are relevant for industrial and rural development organizations, guiding policymakers in proposing effective solutions to reduce industrial impacts on rural areas.
 
Funding
There is no funding support.
 
Authors’ Contribution
Authors contributed equally to the conceptualization and writing of the article. All of the authors approved thecontent of the manuscript and agreed on all aspects of the work declaration of competing interest none.
 
Conflict of Interest
Authors declared no conflict of interest.
 
Acknowledgments
We extend our gratitude to all the scientific consultants involved in this paper, which is part of the MSc thesis completed at Yasouj University.

Keywords

Main Subjects


  1. Abri Oghani, N., Firouzabadi, S.A., & Rad Far, M. (2023). Investigating the Impact of Establishing an Industrial Town on the Development of Surrounding Villages (Study Case: Eshghabad Industrial Town, Ray City). Journal of Rural Research, 14(3), 468-483. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.22059/jrur.2023.348030.1770[In Persian)].
  2. Ansari, E., Farahani, H., & Cheraghi, M. (2020). The role of industrial estates in economic sustainability of rural areas (Case study of Al-Qachin County, Charam County, Kohgiluyeh and Boyer-Ahmad Provinces). Geography18(65), 31-43. DOR: 20.1001.1.27172996.1399.18.2.3.0[In Persian].
  3. Baek, K. M., Kim, M. J., Kim, J. Y., Seo, Y. K., & Baek, S. O. (2020). Characterization and health impact assessment of hazardous air pollutants in residential areas near a large iron-steel industrial complex in Korea. Atmospheric Pollution Research, 11(10), 1754-1766. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apr.2020.07.009
  4. Darban Astane, A., hojjat, S., & Tahmasi, B. (2019). Sustainability indicators measurement of economic development in Rudbar County. Journal of Studies of Human Settlements Planning, 14(3), 757-771. [In Persian].
  5. De Castro, T. C. S., de Castro, A. C. L., Soares, L. S., Henrique, M., Silva, L., Ferreira, H. R. S., & de França, V. L. (2017). Social and environmental impacts on rural communities residing near the industrial complex of São Luís Island, state of Maranhão, Brazil. Journal of Sustainable Development, 10(2), 249-260. https://doi.org/10.5539/jsd.v10n2p249
  6. Fasihi, H., Soleimani Mehrenjani, M., & Ahmadnia Koohestani, S. (2021). Investigating environmental impacts of Talesh industrial estates in Peripheral settlements (The case: Kashli village, Gilan, Iran). Journal of Applied Researches in Geographical Sciences, 21(61), 337-350. [In Persian].  https://doi.org/10.52547/jgs.21.61.337
  7. Freudenburg, W. R. (1992). Addictive economies: Extractive industries and vulnerable localities in a changing world economy. Rural Sociology57(3), 305-332. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1549-0831.1992.tb00467.x
  8. Hajibabaei Alavijeh, A., Kalantari, Kh., & Barati, A. A. (2022). Investigating the economic, social and environmental effects of the Alavijeh industrial zone on the surrounding rural areas. Journal of Rural Research13(1), 104-121. https://doi.org/10.22059/JRUR.2021.310183.1557 [In Persian].
  9. Hajilo, M., Ghadiri masoum, M., & Rezvani, M. (2018). Explaining the effects of industrial parks on the quality of life of rural workers in the industrial parks (Case study: Sharif industrial parks, Abhar County, Zanjan Province). Journal of Studies of Human Settlements Planning12(4), 765-784. [In Persian].
  10. Hamzeii, M., Shayan, H., & Buzarjemehri, K. (2014). The evaluation of social impacts of industrial towns over rural areas Case: Khayam industrial town. Space Economy & Rural Development, 3(9), 149-163. [In Persian].
  11. Hong, H., & Gasparatos, A. (2020). Eco-industrial parks in China: Key institutional aspects, sustainability impacts, and implementation challenges. Journal of Cleaner Production, 274, 122853. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122853
  12. Ihinegbu, C., Nwosu, I., & Nnamchi, H. (2020). Residents’ perception of the consequences of industrial activities in Ilupeju, Southwestern Nigeria. Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment, 30(8), 951-970. https://doi.org/10.1080/10911359.2020.1767012
  13. Kuznetsova, S. N., Romanovskaya, E. V., Artemyeva, M. V., Andryashina, N. S., & Egorova, A. O. (2017). Advantages of residents of industrial parks (by the example of AVTOVAZ). In International conference on Humans as an Object of Study by Modern Science, 622, 502-509. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-75383-6_64
  14. Liu, Y., Huang, J., & Zikhali, P. (2016). The bittersweet fruits of industrialization in rural China: The cost of environment and the benefit from off-farm employment. China Economic Review, 38, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chieco.2015.11.006
  15. Maleki, S., & Akbarimehr, R. (2018). Solid Waste positioning using a combination of ANP-DEMATEL in GIS (Case Study city Boyerahmad). Journal of Geography, Urban and Regional Studies, 7(25), 21-32. [In Persian].
  16. Mirlotfi, M.R., & Mollanoroozi, M. (2014). Effects of Khayyam Industrial Township on the objective quality of Neyshabur Villagerʼs lives. Journal of Geographic Space, 14(46), 243-267. [In Persian].
  17. Muthumariappan, K., & Merdessa, T. (2022). Measuring the sustainability of agricultural cooperatives in Oromia Regional State, Ethiopia: A scorecard approach. African Journal of Economic and Business Research, 1(1), 48-64.
  18. Noroozzadeh, A., Mogholi, M., & Khorambakht, A. (2021). Environmental and social impact of industrial development (Case study: Tehran City). Journal of Environmental Science and Technology23(5), 112-123. [In Persian]. https://doi.org/10.30495/jest.2021.50804.4991
  19. Opoku, E. E. O., & Boachie, M. K. (2020). The environmental impact of industrialization and foreign direct investment. Energy Policy, 137, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2019.111178
  20. Prakash, A. (2016). Rethinking ‘Regional Developmental Imbalances’; Spatial Versus the Socio-political ‘Region’: The Case of Tribals in Jharkhand. In Rethinking State Politics in India (pp. 31-75). Routledge India.
  21. Pashkevich, M. A., Bech, J., Matveeva, V. A., & Alekseenko, A. V. (2020). Biogeochemical assessment of soils and plants in industrial, residential and recreational areas of Saint Petersburg. Journal of Mining Institute, 241, 125-130. https://doi.org/10.31897/PMI.2020.1.125
  22. Plan and Budget Organization (2019). Management and planning organization of Kohgiluyeh and Boyer Ahmad province, Unpublished report.
  23. Pourtaheri, M., Roknodin Eftekhari, A. R., Naghavi, M. R. (2013). The role of industrial estates on economic development of peripheral villages: Case study Behshahr industrial estate. Geographical Researches, 28(3), 105-118. [In Persian].
  24. Rashidi Fakari, F., Ebadi, A., Ozgoli, G., Kariman, N., & Mohamadizeidi, B. (2020). Evaluation of psychometric properties of Persian version of geriatric mistreatment scale in the elderly living in Tehran in 2017-2018: A descriptive study. Journal of Rafsanjan University of Medical Sciences, 19(3), 265-278.https://doi.org/10.29252/jrums.19.3.265 [In Persian].
  25. Riahi, V., & Pashazadeh, A. (2014). Analysis of the effects of establishment of germy industrial area on development of adjacent rural areas. Journal of Applied Research in Geographical Sciences, 14(33), 7-25. [In Persian].
  26. Sarvaramini, Sh., Asadi, A., & Kalantari, Kh. (2010). Investigating effects of eshtehard's industrial city on development of surrounding rural area, Karaj. Journal of Agricultural Economics and Development24(2), 227-238. https://doi.org/10.22067/jead2.v1389i2.3939 [In Persian].
  27. Sdoukopoulos, E., & Boile, M. (2020). Port-hinterland concept evolution: A critical review. Journal of Transport Geography, 86, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2020.102775
  28. Setayesh, H., Memaranjad, A., Hejbarkiani, K., & Torabi, T. (2022). Studying the impact of small and medium-sized manufacturing industries on the growth of industrial value added in Iran’s economy. Financial Economics16(59), 221-252. https://doi.org/10.30495/fed.2022.694720 [In Persian].
  29. Shen, X. M., Huang, Y. Q., Zhang, X. Y., Tong, X. Q., Zheng, P. F., & Shu, L. (2020). Association between dietary patterns and prediabetes risk in a middle-aged Chinese population. Nutrition Journal, 19(1), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12937-020-00593-1
  30. Sung, J. H., Oh, I., Kim, A., Lee, J., Sim, C. S., Yoo, C., Park, S. J., Kim, G. B., & Kim, Y. (2018). Environmental and body concentrations of heavy metals at sites near and distant from industrial complexes in Ulsan, Korea. Journal of Korean Medical Science, 33(5), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2018.33.e33
  31. Yarihesar, A., Bouchani, M. H., & Mohammadi, Z. (2017). Assessment the role of Alborz industrial city in the rural sustainable development indicators. Journal of Research and Rural Planning, 6(3), 59-78. https://doi.org/10.22067/jrrp.v5i4.59890 [In Persian].