Exploring the evolution of rural tourism:systematic review and identifying the current and future trends

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Depatment of Marketing and Entrepreneurship, Faculty of Management and Accounting, College of Farabi, University of Tehran, Qom, Iran

2 Department of Tourism Management and Economics, Faculty of Tourism, College of Management, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran

3 Tourism Department, Research Institute of Cultural Heritage and Tourism, Tehran, Iran

10.22059/jrur.2025.376723.1945

Abstract

A B S T R A C T
Rural tourism, recognized as one of the most community-centered forms of tourism, has substantial economic, social, and cultural impacts. It contributes to retaining local populations in villages and supports sustainable rural development. The rapid growth of rural tourism has led to numerous studies in this area. Consequently, this study aims to examine the conceptual evolution of rural tourism and explore its research trends over the years using bibliometric and visualization techniques. To achieve this, 2,407 articles were retrieved from the Web of Science database and analyzed using VOS Viewer software. The findings indicate a steady increase in the publication and citation of articles in this field, with a record of 352 articles published in 2022 and 7,934 citations in 2023. Additionally, the top researchers, journals, countries, and universities were identified based on citation counts, and a co-authorship analysis of countries illustrated global collaborations in this domain. The co-occurrence analysis of keywords revealed that terms such as "rural tourism," "sustainable development," and "rural development" were the most frequently used in this field. This analysis also uncovered temporal trends, indicating that early research focused on culture, community participation, and service quality. As the concept of sustainable tourism gained importance, topics like environmental sustainability, ecotourism, resilience, and later, innovation, value co-creation, tourist experience, and the circular economy became more prominent. Recently, the influence of technology, such as smart tourism, has become a significant area of focus in this field
Extended Abstract
Introduction
Since the late 1970s, rural tourism has surged globally as a significant leisure pursuit, attracting tourists to countryside areas. It is vital for local economies and cultures, showcasing natural attractions, villages, farms, and historical sites. Rural tourism promotes sustainability, letting visitors immerse in rural life and support local communities. Rural tourism can facilitate sustainable tourism practices, foster the transfer of local cultures, preserve heritage, and safeguard the environment. Rural tourism studies lack comprehensive overview, often focusing on specific aspects rather than providing holistic analysis of the field. To fill this gap, the current research aims to offer a holistic understanding of rural tourism through bibliometric and illustrative methods.
 
Methodology
This study uses bibliometric analysis to explore trends and advancements in rural tourism research, employing a descriptive-analytical approach. The research utilized the Web of Science database to retrieve the data until the beginning of April 2024 with limitation of English language and only review and research articles reaching 2407 articles analyzed and visualized via VOS Viewer data. In addition to descriptive analysis, co-authorship and keywords co occurrence analysis were used.
 
Results and discussion
Scientific works on rural tourism emerged in 1994, with a steady increase in publications since. The peak was in 2022, with 352 articles. Citation rates have consistently risen, hitting a high of 7934 in 2023, highlighting the field's increasing importance and influence. The findings also show that article titled "Food, place and authenticity: local food and the sustainable tourism experience" was the most cited article, Kestenholz was the most cited researcher, Tourism Management Journal was the most cited publication, Aveiro University in Portugal was the most cited institution, and China was the most cited country publishing articles in the field of rural tourism. Based on co-authorship analysis of countries, China also emerges as a leading nation in promoting collaboration with other countries in this field and Based on the co-occurrence analysis of keywords within the field, the most frequent words were rural tourism, sustainable development, and rural development.
Recent years have seen a surge in rural tourism research, prompting numerous studies globally. This research offers an overview of current rural tourism studies, serving as a valuable resource for researchers. By identifying key contributors, journals, and countries, it aids in avoiding redundancy and improving the quality of scientific works in this field. The findings reveal a continuous increase in the number of articles within the field of rural tourism. The number of citations to articles within the field of rural tourism has also displayed an upward trend since its inception. Furthermore, since 2018, there has been a noticeable acceleration in the slope of this trend, indicating a significant increase in the attention and recognition afforded to articles in this field. Based on the co-authorship analysis of countries, China emerges as the leading nation in fostering collaboration with other countries in the realm of scientific production within the field of rural tourism. This suggests a strong commitment to international cooperation and knowledge exchange in advancing research efforts in this domain. The co-occurrence analysis of keywords within the field of rural tourism highlights key terms such as sustainable development, rural development and agritourism as the most frequently used alongside "rural tourism" and "tourism." Additionally, the illustration of the co-occurrence analysis based on temporal trends indicates a longstanding focus on issues such as agricultural tourism and service quality within this research field. However, in recent years, the research process has shifted towards addressing topics such as smart tourism, resilience, and the circular economy, customer experience, co creation and etc reflecting evolving interests and priorities within the field.
 
Conclusion
The findings suggest a notable increase in the number of articles published within the field of rural tourism in recent years. However, upon reviewing published research, it becomes evident that certain applied subfields, such as the impact of social media on the development of rural tourism, have not received sufficient investigation. This indicates a potential area for future research and exploration within the field. It can also be concluded that the scientific development process of the field of rural tourism at the beginning of its formation in the late 19th century was only focused on culture, concept and principles of rural toruism development, service quality and rural community participation and majority of research has focused on studying the economic benefits of rural tourism, such as employment opportunities and economic profitability. However, as sustainability gained prominence in the discourse surrounding rural tourism, some topics got momentum such as ecological environment, ecotourism, resilience, etc. Furthermore, from 2022 onwards, the influence of technology, artificial intelligence, social media, metaverse, and digital marketing has attracted attentions but still literature requires more studies regarding all these area in particular tourist experience, customer jouenry and touchoints, value co creation, tourist engagement, smart tourism in rural tourism marketing and etc.
 
Funding
There is no funding support.
 
Authors’ Contribution
Authors contributed equally to the conceptualization and writing of the article. All of the authors approved thecontent of the manuscript and agreed on all aspects of the work declaration of competing interest none.
 
Conflict of Interest
Authors declared no conflict of interest.
 
Acknowledgments
We are grateful to all the scientific consultants of this paper.

Keywords

Main Subjects


  1. An, W., & Alarcón, S. (2020). How can rural tourism be sustainable? A systematic review. Sustainability12(18), 7758. doi.org/10.3390/su12187758
  2. Arab Mokhtari, T., Moridsadat, P., Tavakoli, M., & Rezaei, N. (2024). Analysis of Knowledge Map of Livelihood Resilience of Rural Tourism Destinations Using VOSviewer. Journal of Rural Research14(4), 610-633. doi: 10.22059/jrur.2023.361233.1851 [in Persian].
  3. Bessière, J. (1998). Local development and heritage: traditional food and cuisine as tourist attractions in rural areas. Sociologia ruralis38(1), 21-34. doi.org/10.1111/1467-9523.00061
  4. Blapp, M., & Mitas, O. (2017). Creative tourism in Balinese rural communities. Current Issues in Tourism21(2), 1-27.
  5. Campos, A. C., Mendes, J., Valle, P. O. D., & Scott, N. (2018). Co-creation of tourist experiences: A literature review. Current Issues in Tourism21(4), 369-400. doi.org/10.1080/13683500.2015.1081158
  6. Council of Europe. (1975). European Charter of the Architecture. Available at: www.icomos.org/en/charters-and-texts
  7. Darbanastane, A., Rezvani, M. R., Motiee Langrudi, S., & mohammadzadeh larijani, F. (2018). The Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Performance Evaluation Processes of Rural Tourism Supply Chain Management. Journal of Tourism and Development7(2), 149-170. doi: 10.22034/jtd.2018.69466 [in Persian].
  8. Eusébio, C., Vieira, A. L., & Lima, S. (2018). Place attachment, host–tourist interactions, and residents’ attitudes towards tourism development: The case of Boa Vista Island in Cape Verde. Journal of Sustainable Tourism26(6), 890-909. doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2018.1425695
  9. Farooq, R. (2024). A review of knowledge management research in the past three decades: a bibliometric analysis. VINE Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems54(2), 339-378. doi.org/10.1108/VJIKMS-08-2021-0169
  10. Gorishevsky, P. (2003). Rural green tourism: history and current state. Rural green tourism, 15-29. Available at: https://www.ceeol.com/search/article-detail?id=946400
  11. Helgadóttir, G., & Dashper, K. (2021). 20 years of Nordic rural tourism research: a review and future research agenda. Scandinavian Journal of Hospitality and Tourism21(1), 60-69. doi.org/10.1080/15022250.2020.1823246
  12. Imani, B., & Madani, J. (2024). Green Rural Tourism: Investigating the Factors Influencing the Development of Sustainable and Environmentally Preserver Rural Tourism. Journal of Environmental Science Studies8(4), 7305-7317. doi: 10.22059/jhgr.2024.373285.1008674 [in Persian].
  13. Isfandyari-Moghaddam, A., Saberi, M. K., Tahmasebi-Limoni, S., Mohammadian, S., & Naderbeigi, F. (2023). Global scientific collaboration: A social network analysis and data mining of the co-authorship networks. Journal of Information Science49(4), 1126-1141. doi.org/10.1177/0165551521104065
  14. Kotzab, H., Bäumler, I., & Gerken, P. (2023). The big picture on supply chain integration–insights from a bibliometric analysis. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal28(1), 25-54. doi.org/10.1108/SCM-09-2020-0496
  15. Kumar, S., Sahoo, S., Lim, W. M., Kraus, S., & Bamel, U. (2022). Fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) in business and management research: A contemporary overview. Technological Forecasting and Social Change178, 121599. doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121599
  16. Kuzo, N. J., & Kosar, N. S. (2017). Marketing support of rural green tourism development in Ukraine. Marketing and Management of Innovations2, 369-381. doi.org/10.21272/mmi.2017.2-34
  17. Lane, B. (1994). "What is rural tourism?". Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 2(1-2), 7-21. doi.org/10.1080/09669589409510680
  18. Lane, B., Kastenholz, E., & Carneiro, M. J. (2022). Rural tourism and sustainability: A special issue, review and update for the opening years of the twenty-first century. Sustainability14(10), 6070. doi.org/10.3390/su14106070
  19. Lee, T. H. (2013). Influence analysis of community resident support for sustainable tourism development. Tourism management34, 37-46. doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2012.03.007
  20. Madani, J. (2022). Investigating the Role of Rural Tourism in the Development of Sustainable Employment of Residents in the Post-Corona Era with a Scenario Approach (Case Study: Sarein County). Journal of Rural Research13(3), 390-407. doi: 10.22059/jrur.2022.336852.1711 [in Persian].
  21. Martínez, J. M. G., Martín, J. M. M., Fernández, J. A. S., & Mogorrón-Guerrero, H. (2019). An analysis of the stability of rural tourism as a desired condition for sustainable tourism. Journal of Business Research100, 165-174. doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.03.033
  22. Medias, F., Rosari, R., Susamto, A. A., & Ab Rahman, A. B. (2023). A bibliometric analysis on innovation in philanthropy research: A study based on Scopus database. International Journal of Innovation Science. doi.org/10.1108/IJIS-08-2022-0139
  23. Mehraliyev, F., Chan, I. C. C., Choi, Y., Koseoglu, M. A., & Law, R. (2020). A state-of-the-art review of smart tourism research. Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing37(1), 78-91. doi.org/10.1080/10548408.2020.1712309
  24. Pahrudin, P., Liu, L. W., & Li, S. Y. (2022). What is the role of tourism management and marketing toward sustainable tourism? A bibliometric analysis approach. Sustainability14(7), 4226. doi.org/10.3390/su14074226
  25. Paresishvili, O., Kvaratskhelia, L., & Mirzaeva, V. (2017). Rural tourism as a promising trend of small business in Georgia: Topicality, capabilities, peculiarities. Annals of Agrarian Science15(3), 344-348. doi.org/10.1016/j.aasci.2017.07.008
  26. Peng, K. L., & Lin, P. M. (2016). Social entrepreneurs: Innovating rural tourism through the activism of service science. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management28(6), 1225-1244. doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-12-2014-0611
  27. Pongponrat, K. (2011). Participatory management process in local tourism development: A case study on fisherman village on Samui Island, Thailand. Asia Pacific Journal of Tourism Research16(1), 57-73. doi.org/10.1080/10941665.2011.539391
  28. Priatmoko, S., Kabil, M., Akaak, A., Lakner, Z., Gyuricza, C., & Dávid, L. D. (2023). Understanding the complexity of rural tourism business: Scholarly perspective. Sustainability15(2), 1193. doi.org/10.3390/su15021193
  29. Qin, D., Xu, H., & Chung, Y. (2019). Perceived impacts of the poverty alleviation tourism policy on the poor in China. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management41, 41-50. doi.org/10.1016/j.jhtm.2019.09.004
  30. Sharpley, R., & Roberts, L. (2004). Rural tourism—10 years on. International Journal of tourism research6(3), 119-124. doi.org/10.1002/jtr.478
  31. Sharpley, R., & Sharpley, J. (1997). Rural tourism. An introduction (pp. 1-165).
  32. Situmorang, R., Trilaksono, T., & Japutra, A. (2019). Friend or Foe? The complex relationship between indigenous people and policymakers regarding rural tourism in Indonesia. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management39, 20-29. doi.org/10.1016/j.jhtm.2019.02.001
  33. Tang, M., & Xu, H. (2023). Cultural integration and rural tourism development: A scoping literature review. Tourism and Hospitality4(1), 75-90. doi.org/10.3390/tourhosp4010006
  34. Tian, Z., Jiang, Y., Zhang, N., Zhang, Z., & Wang, L. (2024). Analysis of the Current State of COPD Nursing Based on a Bibliometric Approach from the Web of Science. International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, 255-268. doi.org/ 10.2147/COPD.S440715
  35. UNWTO. (2020). International tourism growth continues to outpace the global economy. Available at https://www.unwto.org/international-tourism-growth-continues-to-outpace-the-economy. Accessed 25 April 2024.
  36. Uslu, A. & P. Tosun (2024). "Tourist personality, value co‐creation, and emotional well‐being." International Journal of Consumer Studies 48(1): e12995. doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.12995
  37. Xiao, P., Li, L., Qu, J., & Wang, G. (2024). Global research hotspots and trends on robotic surgery in obstetrics and gynecology: a bibliometric analysis based on VOSviewer. Frontiers in Surgery11, 1308489. doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2024.1308489
  38. Zielinski, S., Jeong, Y., Kim, S. I., & B. Milanés, C. (2020). Why community-based tourism and rural tourism in developing and developed nations are treated differently? A review. Sustainability12(15), 5938. doi.org/10.3390/su12155938