Explanation of the center of Gravity of rural-urban flows in the direction of regional equilibrium: A case study of Bushehr county

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

Department of Human Geography and Planning, Faculty of Geography, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran

10.22059/jrur.2024.374719.1931

Abstract

A B S T R A C T
The imbalance in the allocation of resources and development indicators has caused regional and local balance at the national level to face many challenges. These challenges are more pronounced in the southern provinces, including Bushehr province. Therefore, this research aims to present a new model called the gravity center, which can be used to explain rural-urban flows in line with regional balance and to evaluate and analyze force vectors in different dimensions with great accuracy. In order to reduce complex mathematical calculations, the indicators and research components in the three dimensions of economic, socio-cultural, and infrastructure were aligned on the coordinate axes (X, Y, Z), respectively. The present research is of an applied type, considering its purpose, and descriptive-analytical and exploratory type, considering the nature of the research. Regarding the collection of information related to the theoretical foundations of the research and the research background, the library method was used, and the field method was used to collect information to answer the research questions and test the research. The findings of the study revealed that the center of gravity of rural-urban flows can be explained with great accuracy, such that the value of the force vector of the center of gravity of economic flows in the studied areas was (0.244), the center of gravity of socio-cultural flows (0.223), and the center of gravity of infrastructure flows (0.244). The results of the study proved that the value of the force vector of rural-urban flows in the first group is less than the rural areas, and in the second group is more than the center of gravity.
Extended Abstract
Introduction
As we approach the 15th century, rural development in the country continues to encounter numerous challenges. These issues can largely be traced back to the ineffectiveness of both past and present solutions. The solutions implemented so far have not fully addressed the issues present in rural society; while some successes have been achieved in certain areas, they have not been sufficient to create balanced development; as a result, an imbalanced situation persists at the regional and local levels. The present study seeks a new and appropriate pattern and model to explain and examine rural-urban links and flows in line with regional balance. Therefore, the status of rural-urban links at the regional level of Bushehr city is analyzed, and the distance of the force vector of each region is examined and evaluated from the point of view of the support of the model as the spatial vector of rural-urban flows. Thus, in the present study, due to the newness and novelty of the model presented for analyzing rural-urban flow in line with regional balance, it is necessary to conduct necessary investigations regarding the indicators affecting regional balance and the factors affecting its creation that cause the formation of strong links between rural areas and Bushehr city. The main question of the research is as follows:
-Is it possible to present a suitable model for analyzing rural-urban flows in line with regional balance?
The present study is to explain thismodelfor this purpose.
 
Methodology
The current study is applied in purpose and is descriptive-analytical in nature. The study process was based on documentary-library and field surveys based on a questionnaire. The questionnaire related to the components and indicators of regional balance in urban-rural relations in three economic, socio-cultural, and infrastructural-environmental sectors was completed by official statistics. The sampling method and obtaining the sample (households living in the studied rural areas) in the present study is a multi-stage stratified method. Thus, according to the population size and the distance of rural areas from the city center, two strata were determined - from 10 to 25 kilometers and from 25 to 40 kilometers - according to the distance from the city center. After classification, proportional samples were assigned to 380 questionnaires with 71 items.
 
Results and discussion
The findings of the study revealed that the center of gravity of rural-urban flows can be explained with great accuracy, so that the value of the force vector of the center of gravity of economic flows in the studied areas (0.244), the center of gravity of socio-cultural flows (0.223) and the center of gravity of infrastructure flows (0.244) were obtained. The results of the study proved that the value of the force vector of rural-urban flows in the first group of rural areas is less and in the second group is more than the center of gravity to calculate the weight of the indicators of each region, they should be multiplied by the vector of rural-urban flows of different regions, and the result should be divided by the total weight of the indicators of all regions. An important point that should be noted is that in accordance with the theoretical foundations of the study, in order to reduce the costs and complexities related to numerical calculations, one of the studied points can be considered as the center of coordinates, and in this study, Bushehr is considered as the center of coordinates. Thus, according to mathematical rules, the coordinates of Bushehr in the three dimensions of economic, socio-cultural, and infrastructural flows are equal (0, 0, 0). Many studies have addressed the issue of city-rural relations in the form of rural-urban flows and connections. However, given that the gravity center model of rural-urban flows is new and novel and has been used for the first time in this field, the views and opinions of researchers about it have not been evaluated and measured in the form of a scientific article. Therefore, it is hoped that the present study, especially the gravity center model, will be used by other researchers in the near future so that it can be subjected to scientific criticism and its quality can be determined.
 
Conclusion
To study and analyze rural-urban flows, the position of each force vector must be measured relative to the position of the center of gravity. The position of the force vector of rural-urban flows in villages close to the spatial vector of the center of gravity indicates a lack or reduction of the force vector. In other words, villages that are further away from the spatial vector of the center of gravity are in a more suitable situation in terms of development because they include a larger force vector, and the spatial vector of rural-urban flows in such areas is further away from the center of gravity. Suppose villages whose force vector is closer to the center of gravity are developed by strengthening economic, socio-cultural, and infrastructure indicators. In that case, they will certainly have a larger force vector. Their orbital level will be transferred to a spatial vector farther away than before (like electrons that are close to the nucleus and orbit around the nucleus in an orbital; if they receive more energy, they will be transferred to a higher level, and if energy is taken from them, they will fall to lower levels near the nucleus). In other words, their level of development will increase. This means that examining and analyzing the force vector of rural-urban flows at the regional and regional levels can significantly contribute to foresight and regional and spatial development planning and appropriately explain the path of current and future planning.
 
Funding
There is no funding support.
 
Authors’ Contribution
Authors contributed equally to the conceptualization and writing of the article. All of the authors approved thecontent of the manuscript and agreed on all aspects of the work declaration of competing interest none.
 
Conflict of Interest
Authors declared no conflict of interest.
 
Acknowledgments
 We are grateful to all the scientific consultants of this paper.
 

Keywords

Main Subjects


  1. Akbari, S., &Moeedfar, S. (2006). Rural-urban relations and the reasons for Iran's underdevelopment during the Qajar period. Geography. Journal of the Geographical Society of Iran, 3 (7 and 6), 83-95. [In Persian]
  2. Amanpour, S., & Navasari, B. (2017). A study of the mutual relations of the city and the village-villages of Moran Rural District and Ahvaz City. Journal of Research Approaches in Social Sciences, 3 (12), 49-61. [In Persian]
  3. Amini, A., & Rafiei, M. (2019). Obstacles to the formation of rural-urban links in the metropolis of Tehran. Development of peri-urban spaces, 1 (1), 110-95. dor: 20.1001.1.26764164.1398.1.1.9.9 [In Persian]
  4. Arsynindia, L. D., & Mardiansjah, F. H. (2023, November). Spatial Development of Towns and Their Potential in Strengthening Rural-Urban Linkages in Kabupaten Semarang. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science (Vol. 1264, No. 1, p. 012031). IOP Publishing.‌ doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/1264/1/012031
  5. Ataei, M. (2017). Multi-Criteria Decision Making. Fifth Edition. Shahrood University of Science and Technology Publications. [In Persian]
  6. Bergman, G. (2019). The Little Book of Philosophy. Translated by Keyvan Ghobadian, 9th edition, Akhtaran Publishing. [In Persian]
  7. Bloem, S., & de Pee, S. (2017). Developing approaches to achieve adequate nutrition among urban populations requires an understanding of urban development. Global food security12, 80-88.‌doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfs.2016.09.001
  8. Böhm, D. (2018). Rural-Urban Linkages Synergies:Threats And Limitations. Rural 21 – The International Journal for Rural Development, 52, DLG-Verlag GmbH, pp 1-44
  9. Bürgin, R., Mayer, H., Kashev, A., & Haug, S. (2022). Far away and yet so close: urban–rural linkages in the context of multilocal work arrangements. Regional Studies, Regional Science9(1), 110-131.‌ doi: 10.1080/21681376.2022.2042370
  10. Cattaneo, A., Adukia, A., Brown, D. L., Christiaensen, L., Evans, D. K., Haakenstad, A., ... & Weiss, D. J. (2022). Economic and social development along the urban–rural continuum: New opportunities to inform policy. World Development157, 105941.‌ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2022.105941
  11. Davani, S. (2016). Detailed results of the general population and housing census of 2016 in Bushehr city. Population of rural districts in Bushehr city, Management and Planning Organization of Bushehr Province, Deputy for Statistics and Information. [In Persian]
  12. Detailed results of the general population and housing census. (2019). Deputy of Statistics and Information, National Planning and Budget Organization. [In Persian]
  13. Ebrahimi, H., Azhdari, H., Hadinejad, F., Gholami Tanha, M., Rastgou, M., Sheikh Aboli, N., Shafiei, M. (1402). Statistical Yearbook of Education in Bushehr Province, Nai Band Publications. [In Persian]
  14. Halliday, H., & Resnick, R. (2019). Fundamentals of Physics. Wiley & Sons, United States of America
  15. Hatcher, C. (2017). Rural-Urban Linkages in the context of Sustainable Development and Environmental Protection. UN, convention to combat desertification, September 2017, pp 1-26.
  16. Hibbeler, R.C. (2016). STATICS FE Review. Pearson Prentice Hall, Fourteenth Edition, 81, United States of America.
  17. Hutchings, P., Willcock, S., Lynch, K., Bundhoo, D., Brewer, T., Cooper, S., ... & Welivita, I. (2022). Understanding rural–urban transitions in the Global South through peri-urban turbulence. Nature Sustainability, 5(11), 924-930.‌doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-022-00920-w
  18. Jamshidiha, G. (2008). The emergence of sociological theories. Tehran University Press, 3rd edition. [In Persian]
  19. Kazemi, N., Salmani, M., Badri, S.A., & Matouf, S. (2018). Rural-Urban Population Links and Its Impact on Social Capital Creation. Geography and Environmental Sustainability, 8 (4), 73-61. dor: 20.1001.1.23223197.1397.8.4.5.3 [In Persian]
  20. Khaki, G. (2015). Research methods in management. 4th edition, Fuzhan Publishing, Tehran. [In Persian]
  21. Lak Kamari, M., Isvand, H., & Alhuyi Nazari, M. (2020). Applications of multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) methods in renewable energy development: A review. Renewable Energy Research and Applications1(1), 47-54. https://doi.org/10.22044/rera.2020.8541.1006
  22. Li, Y., Xiong, C., & Song, Y. (2022). How do population flows promote urban–rural integration? Addressing migrants’ farmland arrangement and social integration in China’s urban agglomeration regions. Land11(1), 86.‌
  23. Mahdavi, A., Jalalabadi, L., Ziaabadi, M. (2003). Analysis of the Effect of Network Flows on Physical-Spatial Developments of Rural-Urban Linkages. Land Planning, 15 (2), 363- 343. doi: 10.22059/JTCP.2023.366227.670410 [In Persian]
  24. Mansourfar, K. (2014). Basic Mathematics for Social Sciences. Seventh Edition, Samt Publications. [In Persian]
  25. Mehri, A., Saremi, M. (2012). Laboratory Equipment Maintenance Handbook. Second Edition, Saba Publishing Center. [In Persian]
  26. Mirabadi, M., Rajabi, A., & Mahdavi Hajiloui, M. (2018). Explanation and analysis of spatial imbalance and measurement of factors affecting concentration and separation in the city of Mahabad. Quarterly Journal of Geographical Space, 18 (62), 253-274. [In Persian]
  27. Mirvahedi, N., Shafiei, N., & Rahmani, B. (2019). Analysis of the position of rural-urban linkages in empowering agricultural users towards sustainable food security. Journal of Rural Research, 11 (4), 695-674. doi: 10.22059/JRUR.2020.299732.1479 [In Persian]
  28. Moeedfar, S., & Akbari, S. (2007). Rural-urban Relations and Its Developmental Effects, Case Study: Savojbolagh County. Journal of Applied Research in Geographical Sciences, 6 (8), 75-96. [In Persian]
  29. Mohammadi Baghmolaei, A. (2019). Bushehr Province Settlements Identification Card. Bushehr Province Management and Planning Organization. [In Persian]
  30. Momeni, H., & Shirkhani, H. (2013). Spatial Monitoring of Rural-Urban Relations and Links in Sustainable Development of Abhar-Khormadreh Region. Green Development Management Studies, 2(1), 51-66. doi: 10.22077/JGMD.2023.6224.1027 [In Persian]
  31. Motiei Langroodi, S.H. (2007). Rural Planning with Emphasis on Iran. Mashhad University Jihad Publications. [In Persian]
  32. Pilving, T., Kull, T., Suškevics, M., & Viira, A. H. (2022). Diverse networks in regional tourism: ties that foster and hinder the development of rural-urban tourism collaboration in Estonia. European Journal of Tourism Research, 30, 3010-3010. https://doi.org/10.54055/ejtr.v30i.2596 ‌
  33. Rahmani, B., Shafiei Sabet, N., & Mazarzehi, Y. (1400). The role of rural-urban flows in the spatial developments of rural settlements: Peripheral villages of Zahedan city. Journal of Regional Planning, 11 (41), 66-51. doi: 10.30495/JZPM.2021.3972 [In Persian]
  34. Rezvani, M. (2004). An introduction to rural development planning in Iran. Tehran: Ghomes Publishing. [In Persian]
  35. Rezvani, M., & Sanaei Moghadam, S. (2019). The role of rural-urban linkages in the food security of rural households: Dehdasht County. Journal of Spatial Economics and Rural Development, 8 (27), 64-39. [In Persian]
  36. Safarpour, M. (2019). Development of Subject-Network-Free Methods and Numerical Solution of Partial Differential Equations with Common Boundary. PhD Thesis, Persian Gulf University, Mathematics, Applied Mathematics-Numerical Analysis, Supervisor Ahmad Shirzadi [In Persian]
  37. Seif, A. (2004). Educational measurement, assessment and evaluation. 15th Edition, Tehran: Doran Publications. [In Persian]
  38. Shafiei, N., & Mirvahedi, N. (1401). Future Study of Rural-Urban Linkage Capacities Towards Sustainable Food Security. Journal of Rural Research, 13 (2), 297-284.doi: 10.22059/JRUR.2022.337923.1716 [In Persian]
  39. Shakour, A., Shojaei Fard, A., & Zare, P. (2020). The Role of Rural-Urban Relationship in Regional Planning with a Population Sustainability Approach through Sustainable Rural Development in Iran. Journal of Regional Planning, 10 (39), 20-1.dor: 20.1001.1.22516735.1399.10.39.1.3 [In Persian]
  40. Sheikh Rezaei, H., & Karbasizadeh, A. (2013). Introduction to the Philosophy of Science. Second Edition, Tehran: Hermes Publishing. [In Persian]                    
  41. Sun, X., Zhang, B., Ye, S., Grigoryan, S., Zhang, Y., & Hu, Y. (2024). Spatial Pattern and Coordination Relationship of Production–Living–Ecological Space Function and Residents’ Behavior Flow in Rural–Urban Fringe Areas. Land13(4), 446.‌ doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/land13040446
  42. Wiggins, S., Sabates-Wheeler, R., & Yaro, J. (2018). Rural Transitions, Economies and Rural–Urban Links, Working Paper 11.‌
  43. Xie, S., & Huang, X. (2022). Flowing sense of place: Perceptions of host city impacting on city attachment of rural-urban migrants in China. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 88, 106-118.‌ doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2022.04.003