Analysis of barriers to industrialization of animal husbandry: The case of Ghaleh-Ganj County of Kerman Province

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

Abstract

Introduction
With regard to increasing population growth, the demand for food products, including livestock production also increases. Thus, it is really important to pay enough attention to livestock production system in the process of food security of the country. Livestock and livestock products provide direct cash income. Some agricultural researchers believe that livestock are alive agricultural banks. Furthermore, livestock is a source of protein and manure which are useful in human nutrition and soil fertility respectively. Thus, livestock industrialization can be considered as a solution to overcoming rural development problems especially food security problems. Accordingly, the main question of this study was: what are the barriers of industrialization of animal husbandry in Ghaleh Ganj County of Kerman Province?
Methodology
A survey research method was used in this study. A researcher constructed questionnaire was developed and utilized to collect data. Furthermore, face validity procedure was used to ensure the validity of the supposed questionnaire and its reliability was also verified calculating Cronbach's Alpha reliability coefficient (from 0.532 to 0.733) based on the data collected in a pilot study. This research was conducted in Ghaleh Ganj County of Kerman Province. This County consists of five districts. Three districts were selected randomly. 810 livestock breeders lived in these districts. About 266 ones of them were selected and studied based on Kerjcie and Morgan Sampling Table and stratified sampling procedure. Different statistical analyses such as frequency, mean score, standard deviation, coefficient of variation, cluster analysis and paired t-test were used to analyze data.
Findings
The findings of this study showed that there are different barriers in the process of animal husbandry industrialization i.e.:
Economic barriers: high feed prices, low financial abilities of the breeders, high purchasing costs of equipment
Structural barriers: lack of land ownership documents, land transfer problems, lack of high yield adopted races
Education- extension barriers: low competency extension officers, lack of access to research centers associated with livestock
Socio- cultural barriers: low risk-taking spirit, multi job attribute of people and aged structure of them
Organizational barriers: Lack of attention to the livestock sector in the country's macroeconomic policies, lack of support from Jihad-e-Agriculture Organization especially in the early stages of production, and the cumbersome administrative regulations
Geographical barriers: mismatch of the used material with local conditions and construction of livestock units close to the village
Individual barriers: dependency to state supports, low technical knowledge of the breeders and unwillingness of them for continuous relationships with each other
Moreover, the comparative analysis of the above barriers showed that organizational, structural, economic, socio-cultural, individual, geographical and education- extension barriers ranked from first to seventh respectively.
Conclusion
The results of this study showed that organizational and structural barriers are the most important inhibitors of livestock industrialization. Moreover, livestock industrialization barriers have a high level in the study area. Thus, more attention should be paid to this issue.
Introduction
With regard to increasing population growth, the demand for food products, including livestock production also increases. Thus, it is really important to pay enough attention to livestock production system in the process of food security of the country. Livestock and livestock products provide direct cash income. Some agricultural researchers believe that livestock are alive agricultural banks. Furthermore, livestock is a source of protein and manure which are useful in human nutrition and soil fertility respectively. Thus, livestock industrialization can be considered as a solution to overcoming rural development problems especially food security problems. Accordingly, the main question of this study was: what are the barriers of industrialization of animal husbandry in Ghaleh Ganj County of Kerman Province?
Methodology
A survey research method was used in this study. A researcher constructed questionnaire was developed and utilized to collect data. Furthermore, face validity procedure was used to ensure the validity of the supposed questionnaire and its reliability was also verified calculating Cronbach's Alpha reliability coefficient (from 0.532 to 0.733) based on the data collected in a pilot study. This research was conducted in Ghaleh Ganj County of Kerman Province. This County consists of five districts. Three districts were selected randomly. 810 livestock breeders lived in these districts. About 266 ones of them were selected and studied based on Kerjcie and Morgan Sampling Table and stratified sampling procedure. Different statistical analyses such as frequency, mean score, standard deviation, coefficient of variation, cluster analysis and paired t-test were used to analyze data.
Findings
The findings of this study showed that there are different barriers in the process of animal husbandry industrialization i.e.:
Economic barriers: high feed prices, low financial abilities of the breeders, high purchasing costs of equipment
Structural barriers: lack of land ownership documents, land transfer problems, lack of high yield adopted races
Education- extension barriers: low competency extension officers, lack of access to research centers associated with livestock
Socio- cultural barriers: low risk-taking spirit, multi job attribute of people and aged structure of them
Organizational barriers: Lack of attention to the livestock sector in the country's macroeconomic policies, lack of support from Jihad-e-Agriculture Organization especially in the early stages of production, and the cumbersome administrative regulations
Geographical barriers: mismatch of the used material with local conditions and construction of livestock units close to the village
Individual barriers: dependency to state supports, low technical knowledge of the breeders and unwillingness of them for continuous relationships with each other
Moreover, the comparative analysis of the above barriers showed that organizational, structural, economic, socio-cultural, individual, geographical and education- extension barriers ranked from first to seventh respectively.
Conclusion
The results of this study showed that organizational and structural barriers are the most important inhibitors of livestock industrialization. Moreover, livestock industrialization barriers have a high level in the study area. Thus, more attention should be paid to this issue.

Keywords


ازکیا، م.، 1374، جامعه‌شناسی توسعه و توسعه‌نیافتگی روستایی ایران، تهران، انتشارات اطلاعات.
جلال‌‌زاده، م.، قاسمی، ج.، گودرزی، س.، فرجادنیا، ک. و قارون، ز.، 1389، تحلیل ابزارهای مدیریت ریسک در گاوداری‌‌های صنعتی شیری شهرستان‌‌های ارومیه و خوی،تحقیقات اقتصاد و توسعة کشاورزی ایران، سال 41، شمارة 2، صص. 180-171. ‌‌
حاج‌سیدجوادی، س.م.ر. و صمدی، م.، 1388، توسعة یک مدل آماری چندمتغیره به‌منظور رتبه‌‌بندی شرکت‌‌های کشت و صنعت تحت پوشش وزارت جهاد کشاورزی براساس عملکرد مالی سال‌‌های 1384 و 1385، اقتصاد کشاورزی و توسعه، سال 17، شمارة 68، صص. 128-103.
رضوانفر، ا.، ویسی، ه.، و شفیعی، ف.، 1383[M1] ، گروه‌‌بندی استان‌‌های مختلف ازنظر ظرفیت دام‌پروری به‌منظور منطقی‌کردن ارائة خدمات پشتیبانی، روستا و توسعه، صص. 19-1.
زمانی‌پور، ا.، 1373، ترویج کشاورزی در فرایند توسعه، بیرجند، انتشارات دانشگاه بیرجند. ‌‌
سازمان جهاد کشاورزی جنوب استان کرمان، 1391، گزارش آمار کشاورزی، منتشرنشده.
طاهرخانی، م.، 1380، نقش نواحی صنعتی در توسعة مناطق روستایی (مطالعة موردی: نواحی صنعتی روستایی استان مرکزی، پژوهش‌‌های جغرافیایی، سال چهارم، شمارۀ 4، صص. 45-33.
قره‌‌باش، ا. و تقی‌‌فورچی[M2] ، م.، 1390، ضرورت توسعة دام‌پروری صنعتی در شمال استان گلستان،همایش منطقه‌‌ای دانش‌محور در مدیریت پایدار کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی، صص. 6-1.
مرکز آمار ایران، 1390، سالنامة آماری استان کرمان، معاونت برنامه‌‌ریزی (دفتر آمار و اطلاعات) استانداری، 751 صفحه.
مطیعی لنگرودی، س.ه. و نجفی‌‌کانی، ع.، 1385، بررسی ارزیابی اثرات شهرک‌‌ها و نواحی صنعتی در توسعة اقتصادی و اجتماعی مناطق روستایی شهرستان بابل،پژوهش‌‌های جغرافیایی، شمارة 58، صص. 165-147.
موحد[M3] ، ع.، فیروزی، م.ع. و روزبه، ح.، 1390، تحلیل درجة توسعه‌‌یافتگی شهرستان‌‌های استان خوزستان با استفاده از روش تحلیل عاملی و تحلیل خوشه‌‌ای،مجلة پژوهش و برنامه‌‌ریزی شهری، سال 2، شمارة 5، صص. 56-43.
Abraham, T., 1994, Rural Industries and Rural Industrialization in Developing Economy, India Eexperience, Jurnal of Rural Recon Struction, 8(2), PP. 37-51.
Benek, R. and Thomson, S.R., 1998, Genaralized Optical Hedge Ration Estimation, American Journal of Agricutral Economics, 77, PP. 858-868.
Dent, J.B. and Thornton, P.K., 1998, The Role of Biological Simulation Models Infarming Systems Research, Journal of Agricultural Administration and Extension, Vol. 29, No. 2, PP. 111-112.
FAO, 1993, Agricultural Extension and Farm Women in the 1980s, Rome: FAO, http: www.Fao.org.
FAO, 2006, Framework on Effective Rural Communitication and Development, http:www.Fao.org.
Misra, R.P., and Achyuta, R.N., 1990, Micro- level Rural Planning: Principle methods and Case Study, Concept publishing company: New Dehli, page 337.
Navaratne, M.A.J.S. and Buchenrieder, G., 2003, Economics of Small-scale Dairy Farming in Sri Lanka- A Case study from Coconut Cattle Silvo Pastoral System, Technological and Institutional Innovation for Sustainable Rural Development.
Niknam, T., Taherian-Fard, E., Pourjafarian, N. & Rousta, A., 2011, An Efficient Hybrid Algorithm based on Modified Imperialist Competitive Algorithm and K-means for Data Clustering, Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 24, PP. 306-317.
Scozzi, B. and Garavelli, C., 2005, Methods for Modeling and Supporting Innovation Processes in SMEs, European Journal of Innovation Management, 8(1), PP. 120- 137.
Short, D.S., 2000, Structure, Management and Performance Characteristicts of Specialized Dairy Farm Business in the Unites State, Agricultural Handbook, Number 720, 50 p.
Soontiens, W., 2002, Managing International Trade: an analysis of South African SMEs and regional exports, Management Decision, 40(7), PP. 710-719.
Tambunan, T., 2009, Development and some Constraints of SME in Indonesia, Center for industry, SME and Business Competition Studies.University of Trisakti, Jurnal of Dewelopment and Agricultural Economic, 1 (2), PP. 27-40.
Vries, A.D. and Russgiesy, L., 2002, Profitability of U.S. Dairy Farms, Florida dairy business conference, Ocala, 5 p.
Xu, R. and Wunsch, D., 2005, Survey of Clustering Algorithms, Neural Networks, IEEE Transactions on, 16(3), PP. 645-678.
 
References
Azkia, M., 1995, The Sociology of Development and Non development in Iran, Ittilaat Publishers, Tehran.
Abraham, T., 1994, Rural Industries and Rural Industrialization in Developing Economy, India experience, Jurnal of Rural Recon Struction, 8(2), PP. 37-51.
Haj Seyed Javadi, S.M. & Samadi, M., 2009, Development of a Multivariate Statistical Model to Rank Companies According to Agriculture Ministry of Agro-Industry Performance in Fiscal Years 1384 and 1385, Agricultural and Development Economics, Vol. 17, No. 68, PP. 103-128.
Motiee Langroodi, S.H. and Najafi Kani, A., 2006, Review and Evaluate the Effects of Towns on Rural Settlements: the case of babol county, Geographical Research Quarterly, 58, PP. 147-165.
Statistical Center of Iran, 2011, Annual Statistic Report of Kerman Province, Statistical Center Publication. 751 pages, Tehran.
Taher Khani, M., 2001, The Role of Industrial Areas in the Development of Rural Areas (A case study: rural industrial regions of Markazi province), Geographical Research Quarterly, 4, PP. 33-45.
Zamanipoor, A., 1994, Agricultural Extension in the Development Process, Birjand, Birjand University Press.
 [M1]همه جا در متن آمده است: 1385
در متن آمده است: قورچی [M2]
در متن نیست. [M3]