Analysis of Structures Affecting People's Social Participation in Barakat Foundation Projects (Case Study: Villages of Sarvabad City)

Document Type : Thesis Article

Authors

1 Associate Professor, Department of Sociology, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Kurdistan, Sanandaj, Iran.

2 MSc., Department of Sociology, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Kurdistan, Sanandaj, Iran.

Abstract

The issue of the present study is the relationship between participation and development, especially social development. One of the most important issues in social development is rural development plans. The success or failure of rural development plans or projects depends on the degree of involvement of local communities in the plans and their evaluation of the projects. In order to find out the relationship between rural participation in general in the development projects of Barakat Foundation (affiliated to the Executive Headquarters of Imam Khomeini), this study has studied the villages of Sarvabad city of Kurdistan province in the years 97-99. The research methodology was quantitative and with survey technique and questionnaire tools. The statistical population of the study included all stakeholders in Barakat Foundation projects during the years 97-99 in Oraman, Payglan, Bisaran and Jerizheh districts. The sample size was determined based on Cochran's formula and the sampling method was done by stratified sampling. A questionnaire was used to collect data, which was designed based on the objectives of the research. Then simultaneous regression analysis and Pearson correlation coefficient were performed on the collected data using SPSS Ver23 software. The results showed that there is a significant relationship between social justice, institutional trust, people's satisfaction with development projects, social belonging, socio-economic status and public awareness of Barakat Foundation projects with the level of social participation in Barakat Foundation projects. In other words, these factors can be considered effective factors on people's participation in the projects of the Barakat Village Foundation in Sarvabad city.

Keywords


Azkia, M. (2007). Sustainable Rural Development, Tehran, Information Publications.
Barkat Foundation. (2020). A comprehensive model for the development of underprivileged and rural areas, Tehran, New Ideas publisher.
Bruce, N. (2017). Social security, growth and welfare in overlapping generations economies with or without annuities journal of public Economics, 41(19), 239-253.
Danesh-Mehr, H., & Ahmadresh, R. (2009). Surveying the social attitudes of villagers towards social participation (case study: Deshe village of Paveh County), Rural Development Quarterly, Volume 1, Number 1: 1-27.
Ghafari, Gh., & Niazi, M. (2016). Participatory Sociology, Tehran, Neshar Press.
Ghasemi, M. A. (2015). investigation of socio-economic factors affecting the participation of villagers in construction projects: a case study of the central part of Kashan city, Rural and Development Quarterly, Volume 8, Number 4: 79-112.
Goetschel, L. (2020). Globalization and social participation: The Challenge of Collective Action, Akadamic Loccum, 46(12), 319-348.
Hyyppa, M., Maki, J. E., & Erkki, A. (2018). Long - term stability of social participation. Springer science, 26(42), 389- 396.
Jatmikowati, S. H., Abdullah, A., & Pangalila, T. (2019). Community participation (analysis on implementation of policies on village development guidelines based on Permendagri No. 114 of 2014 in Simojayan Village, Ampelgading Distric, Malang Regency). International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering (IJRTE), 8(3S2), 520-526.‏
Milbrath, L. (2020). Social Participation, U, S, A: Nally College Puslishing Company.
Morissette, T. M. (2019). Elder friendliness and social participation of older adult living within age- segregated retirement Communities University of California at Los Angles. UMI Number: 1466144.
Movarej, M., Pourateshi, M., A.Z., Mirzareza., A.K., & Sokhtanlo, S. (2014). Factors influencing people participation in rural reclamations plans. Iranian Journal of Agricultural Economics and. Development Research. 45 (3), 555-564. doi: 10.22059/ijaedr.2014.53172.
Oakley, P., & Marsden, D. (1984). Approaches to participation in rural development. International labour office.‏
Piškur, B., Daniëls, R., Jongmans, M. J., Ketelaar, M., Smeets, R. J., Norton, M., & Beurskens, A. J. (2014). Participation and social participation: are they distinct concepts?. Clinical rehabilitation, 28(3), 211-220.‏
Pretty, I. (2015). Participatory Learning for Sustainable Agriculture, World Development, pp.1247-1263.
Sapienza, H. J. (2019). Social participation, knowledge acquisition, and knowledge exploitation in young technology-based firms. Strategic Management Journal, 22(67), 587–613.
Statistical Centre of Iran. (2015). General Population and Housing Census.
Susilowati, N., Herdiani, A., & Widhiastuti, R. (2018). Village Community Participation Model in Village Funds Management to Exteriorize the Accountability. KnE Social Sciences, 1024-1038.
Taleb M., Mirzaiee, H., & Naderi, A. (2012). Evaluating the role of participation in rural development projects (case study: rural development projects), Local Development Quarterly, Volume 4, Number 1: 1-18.
Welch, C., Piekkari, R., Plakoyiannaki, E., & Paavilainen, E. (2019). Theorizing from case studies: Towards a pluralistic future for international business research. Journal of International Business Studies, 42(5), 740–762.
Ylirenko, H., Autio, E., & Tontti, V. (2018). Social participation, knowledge, and the international growth of technology-based new firms. International Business Review, 11(95), 279–304.