Qualitative analysis of the Rural Guidance Plan of Moqiseh Village Based on Planning Approaches

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 MA., Department of Architecture and Urban Planning, Faculty of Architecture and Urban Planning, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.

2 PhD Student, Department of Architecture and Urban Planning, Faculty of Architecture and Urban Planning, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran.

3 Professor, Department of Architecture and Urban Planning, Faculty of Architecture and Urban Planning, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.

Abstract

The village in Iran is a habitat for 30% of the population and one of the main sources of food production. Proper planning can help balance the settlement system and reduce problems in cities. In between, the Guidance Plan is responsible for the physical and functional regulation of the villages. In this research, to get to the root of the matter, philosophical views and their final products in the field of planning will be studied. These views are the philosophical perspective of positivism, which is the product of individual rational planning and interpretation and is the final product of communication planning. The Guidance Plan of Moghiseh village has various stages, from preparation to implementation. These steps include two types of planning based on the above philosophical perspectives. The report outlines these steps, which were achieved through interviews with villagers and founda-tion experts and the study of the Guidance plan's content. The conclusions show the main causes of the differences in these two types of planning, which were created because of the differences in views on the philosophical perspectives of these plan-ning approaches to humans. Accordingly, the humans who influenced the formation of this plan were categorized, and the effect of each on the plan was elaborated on. Therefore, the awareness and increase of human capital of planners and designers (first and sec-ond class activists) should be considered at least as much as the skills and sciences of planning and design in universities, organizations, etc.

Keywords

Main Subjects


Ejlali, P. (2011). Advocacy Planning Theory: Revisited. Social Development and Welfare Planning, 2(5), 1-14. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/157858/en (IN Persian)
Meshkini, A., Zanganeh, A., & Amirhajlo, A. (2022). Metheodoligical criticism on urban studies based on the Philosophy of Critical Realism. Geography, Volume:20 Issue: 73, 2022,81-97. (IN Persian)
Nouri Karder, M., Zahedi, S., Nazemi, M. (2018). Analysing cheking the role Of Communicative planning in the upgrade of urban development az novel approach in Iran. Case sample: Sohrabiye neighbourhood in Karaj. URBAN MANAGEMENT, 16(49), 117-132. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/92192/en. (IN Persian)
Nurmohammadi, Kh., & Hosseinzadeh Lanjabadi, T. (June 2021). A reflection on planning methods (comprehensive planning vs. planning key lines). Iran Islamic Council Research Cen-ter. (IN Persian)
Piri, A., & Roshanayi, H. (2013). Technology and reflection in urban planning. The 6th Na-tional Conference on Urban Planning and Management with an emphasis on the components of the Islamic city. (IN Persian)
Rafieian, M., Maroofi, S. (2012). Theoretical Applica-Tion of Collaborative Planning in New Urban Planning Theories. Armanshahr, 4(7), 113-120. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/202432/en. (IN Persian)
Razavian, M. T., Khazaee, M. (2012). The Ef-Fects of Logical Positivism in Geography and Urban Planning Sample: Cities in Iran (1300-2011). Geographical Journal Of Chash-Mandaz-E-Zagros, 3(10), 129-149. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/175791/en. (IN Persian)
Shafiei Sabet, N., Sadat Mirvahedi, S (2019). Investigating the Impact of Planning Approach on Empowering Villagers in Sustainable Rural Development (Case Study: Ray and Pakdasht County). Journal of Regional Planning, 9 (33), 87-104. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/230720/en. (IN Persian)
Tarhani, H., Partovi, P. (2018). Realisation Mechanisms for the Public In-terest in Successful Urban Development Plans, with an Emphasis on Planning Theories of the Second Half of the 20th Century. SOFFEH, 28 (82), 91-112. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/94225/en(IN Persian)