پویایی سرمایه اجتماعی شبکه ذی‌نفعان محلی در راستای مدیریت مشارکتی روستایی مطالعه موردی: شهرستان گچساران

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 گروه احیای مناطق خشک و کوهستانی، دانشکده منابع طبیعی، دانشگاه تهران، کرج، ایران

2 گروه معماری و شهرسازی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد تهران مرکز، تهران، ایران

3 گروه سیاست‌گذاری منابع طبیعی، دانشکده منابع طبیعی، دانشگاه تهران، کرج، ایران

4 مؤسسه کسب‌وکار اجتماعی، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران

5 مرکز مطالعات توسعه روستایی، پژوهشکده سوانح طبیعی، تهران، ایران

10.22059/jrur.2025.373794.1924

چکیده

تجربه بسیاری از کشورهای درحال‌توسعه نشان می‌دهد که اجرای طرح‌هایی با رویکردهای مشارکتی و قبول نقش فاعلی جوامع محلی در برنامه‌های توسعه، مسئولیت ایجاد دگرگونی در محیط را از عناصر خارجی سلب و اجرای اصلاحات را در گروی فعالیت عناصر درونی قرار خواهد داد. با توجه به اینکه وجود سرمایه اجتماعی بالا در بین افراد منجر به مشارکت بیشتر آنان و موفقیت طرح‌های مشارکتی خواهد گردید، در این تحقیق خصوصیات ساختاری سرمایه اجتماعی در راستای مدیریت مشارکتی روستایی در بین اعضای صندوق‌های خرد توسعه روستاهای چهار بیشه علیا و خیرآباد خلیفه از توابع شهرستان گچساران استان کهگیلویه و بویراحمد در قبل و بعد از اجرای طرح آبادانی و پیشرفت منظومه‌های روستایی، مورد تحلیل قرارگرفته است. جامعه آماری در این مطالعه سرگروه‌های گروه‌های خرد توسعه روستایی است که 123 نفر را شامل می‌شود که به روش تمام شماری انتخاب گردیدند. در این تحقیق میزان روابط اعتماد و مشارکت در شبکه ذینفعان با استفاده از پرسشنامه تحلیل شبکه‌ای و بر اساس مشاهده مستقیم و مصاحبه با تمام کنشگران، همچنین با توجه به سنجش تمامی شاخص‌های سطح کلان شبکه مانند تراکم، تمرکز، دوسویگی، انتقال‌یافتگی و میانگین فاصله ژئودزیک در مرحله قبل و بعد از اجرای پروژه است. پس از اجرای پروژه میزان این شاخص‌ها افزایش پیداکرده است و به حد مطلوبی رسیده است و می‌توان بیان کرد اجرای این پروژه میزان اعتماد، مشارکت و سرمایه اجتماعی را افزایش داده که بر مشارکت گسترده روستاییان، افزایش رفاه اجتماعی و دستیابی به توسعه پایدار روستایی اثرگذار خواهد بود.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله [English]

Social Capital Dynamic of Local Stakeholder Network in Rural Co-Management: the case study of Gachsaran county

نویسندگان [English]

  • Mehdi Ghorbani 1
  • Seyed Amirhossein garakani 2
  • Leila Avazpour 3
  • Maryam Yazdanparast 4
  • Sajad Amiri 5
1 Department of Reclamation of Arid and Mountainous Regions, Faculty of Natural Resources, University of Tehran, Karaj, Iran
2 Department of Architecture, Faculty of Architecture and Urban Planning, Central Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
3 Department of Natural Resources Policy, Faculty of Natural Resources, University of Tehran, Karaj, Iran
4 Social Business Institute, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
5 Centre of Rural Development Studies, Natural Disasters Research Institute, Tehran, Iran
چکیده [English]

A B S T R A C T
The experience of many developing countries shows that the implementation of projects with participatory approaches and the acceptance of the active role of local communities in development programs will deprive external elements of the responsibility for creating changes in the environment, and the implementation of reforms will depend on the activities of internal elements. Considering that the existence of high social capital among individuals will lead to their greater participation and the success of participatory projects, in this study, the structural characteristics of social capital in line with participatory rural management among the members of micro-development funds in the villages of Chaharbisheh Oliya and Khairabad Khalife in Gachsaran county of Kohgiluyeh and Boyer-Ahmad province before and after the implementation of the development plan and the progress of rural systems have been analyzed. The statistical population in this study is the heads of rural development microgroups, which includes 123 people who were selected using the full network method. In this study, the level of trust and collaboration relationships in the network of stakeholders is based on a network analysis questionnaire and based on direct observation and interviews with all actors, as well as considering the measurement of all macro-level indicators of the network, such as density, concentration, reciprocity, transitivity, and the geodesic distance in the stage before and after the implementation of the project. After the implementation of the project, the number of these indicators increased and reached a desirable level. It can be stated that the implementation of this project has increased the level of trust, participation, and social capital, which will affect the widespread participation of villagers, increase social welfare, and achieve sustainable rural development.
Extended Abstract
Introduction
Social capital refers to “resources embedded in social relations.” It is known for its potential role in joint management. It is becoming increasingly popular because it may reduce the expenses of working, enhance information transition, improve social movement, and encourage collaboration by shared standards. Numerous have examined the effects of social capital, focusing on community empowerment. The distribution of social resources among different communities has different characteristics. Therefore, in order to reduce conceptual complexities and homogenize the interests of residents, especially in rural communities, increased research on joint management of social capital and empowerment has been emphasized. According to the mentioned definitions and based on the research objectives, the study of social capital and its examples, including trust and collaboration in the empowerment of rural society, is a key principle in rural development.
 
Methodology
Gachsaran county is located in Kohgiluye and Boyerahmad province, Iran, with a population of 12400 people. In this city, most people are engaged in agriculture and animal husbandry, and their annual income depends on these sectors. Given economic issues in this region, the "Progress and Development of Rural Systems" project was established in this area. This project aimed to institutionalize and build capacity among rural people, which enables their empowerment and collaboration, as well as the empowerment of rural communities, to improve their livelihood and living standards. In fact, micro-credit funds have been created with the approach of micro-financing based on the production value chain and support sustainable employment in this field. Social Network Analysis (SNA) was employed as a research method in this study because gauging social capital is crucial and challenging and is a crucial approach for assessing it. This method allows researchers to investigate structured connections among players inside a system that either facilitates or hinders human behavior. In this research, the highest-level indexes of the social network have been studied, which are introduced as follows as Density, Centralization, Reciprocity, Transitivity, and Geodesic Distance. The sample size for this research is comprised of all members of microcredit funds in 2 villages (totaling 123 members). In this research, the "full network method" was used.
 
Results and discussion
The Density index in all studied areas increased after the empowerment project was implemented. In addition, on average, the Reciprocity and Transitivity index increased in trust and collaboration networks in the studied villages. Thus, it could be un
 
derstood that social capital and empowerment in local communities are both required and complementary. The results showed that after implementing the plan, the Centralization decreased, and power was divided among the activists. The Geodesic Distance between the two bonds of trust and participation indicates the relatively favorable speed of trust, participation, unity, and unity among people, which has continued to decrease after the implementation of the project. As a result, any action aimed at building the capacity of the local community, increasing social capital, and promoting trust and collaboration among local communities will ultimately lead to maintaining and strengthening the social structures of that community. Therefore, this community develops into a region that serves as the foundation for long-term rural development. These results can be applied to other research and interference areas, such as community development studies, participatory research, and social intervention.
Based on the results of the Density index in the investigated networks, this rate is medium to high, and in terms of trust, cooperation, and social capital, the continuity between the networks rises by the same amount. Accordingly, between the studied links, dense networks can be useful to enhance and develop the members' social capital.  Based on the results of the concentration index, the implementation of the project has effectively reduced the concentration and division of power in the network. Gašević et al. (2019) noted that the lower the concentration level in the network of relationships, the higher the level of power-sharing in the network, and the more stakeholders will be influential in decision-making in rural management. According to the results of the index of reciprocity and transitivity of ties in the study's second phase compared to the phase before the project in the studied villages, the number of ties has increased. Strengthening bonds of trust and cooperation creates a stable network in which people's spirit of trust, cooperation, and cooperation is institutionalized. Also, this leads to increased social capital, and participatory planning in rural development will be associated with less cost and time. The Geodesic Distance between the two bonds of trust and participation indicates the relatively favorable speed of trust, participation, unity, and unity among people, which has continued to decrease after the implementation of the project, which indicates the high circulation of trust and participation among people. Considering the importance of the time and speed of coordinating people in the discussion of collaborative management, strengthening the bond of trust and especially participation in order to increase the speed of circulation of this bond among people and then reduce the time of coordination and unity among the members of micro funds in line with the implementation community-oriented management is essential.
 
Conclusion
In order to develop sustainable rural development, obstacles and challenges need to be recognized. Conscious knowledge and use of social capital is an opportunity to build capacity for participation in rural development. In general, in order to succeed in rural development, strengthening social capital through trust and participation and thereby increasing social cohesion is needed. The formation of micro funds and rural development groups are among the strategies to increase trust and participation among individuals and increase social capital. Social capital in the form of local organizations reduces poverty and increases the community's welfare, which is the basis for achieving
 
sustainable rural development.
 
Funding
This project has been carried out with the financial support of the Islamic Revolution Housing Foundation.
 
Authors’ Contribution
Authors contributed equally to the conceptualization and writing of the article. All of the authors approved the content of the manuscript and agreed on all aspects of the work declaration of competing interest none.
 
Conflict of Interest
Authors declared no conflict of interest.
 
Acknowledgments
This article is a part of the progress and development plan of the rural system of Gachsaran city, which has been funded 

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Social Capital
  • Rural Systems
  • Co-management
  • Social Network Analysis
  • Sustainable Development
  1. اشتری، حسن؛ قربانی، مهدی؛ خراسانی، محمدامین و غفاری، صدیقه. (1403). تحلیل پویایی انسجام سازمانی در اجرای طرح آبادانی و پیشرفت روستایی (منطقه موردمطالعه: شهرستان گچساران). نشریه پژوهش‌های روستایی، 15(2)، 382-397. ‌ https://doi.org/10.22059/jrur.2024.377112.1950
  2. اکبری، الهام و عوض پور، لیلا. (1401). تحلیل پویایی سرمایه اجتماعی در توسعه و توانمندسازی جوامع محلی در مناطق خشک؛ کاربرد تحلیل شبکه اجتماعی.  نشریه مرتع و آبخیزداری، 75(3)، 333-345. https://doi.org/10.22059/jrwm.2022.351397.1685
  3. رمضانی، سعید و رحیمی، مجید. (1403). نظام حکمرانی آلودگی هوا: کاربرد تحلیل شبکه سازمانی در اجرای قانون هوای پاک. حکمرانی منابع طبیعی، 1(1)، 40-50. https://doi.org/10.22059/jnrg.2024.367281.1005
  4. غفاری، غلامرضا و رمضانی، حسین. (1392). سرمایه اجتماعی (ترجمه). انتشارات کویر.
  5. قربانی، مهدی. (1399). تحلیل اعتبارسنجی ابعاد زیست پذیری جامعه محلی منطقه موردمطالعه: شهرستان قلعه گنج، استان کرمان. مجله تحقیقات اقتصاد و توسعه کشاورزی ایران، 51(2)، 243-261. https://doi.org/10.22059/ijaedr.2019.281534.668755
  6. قربانی، مهدی؛ بوزرجمهری، خدیجه؛ عوض پور، لیلا و منصوری، زهرا. (1396). اثربخشی رویکرد مدیریت اجتماع‌محور در راستای تقویت سرمایة اجتماعی برون گروهی و کاهش مطرودیت اجتماعی مطالعة موردی: شهرستان ریگان، استان کرمان. مجله پژوهش و برنامه‌ریزی روستایی، 6(2)، 158-169. https://doi.org/10.22067/jrrp.v6i2.58795
  7. قربانی، مهدی؛ عوض پور، لیلا و خراسانی، محمدامین. (1394). تحلیل و ارزیابی سرمایة اجتماعی شبکه‌های خرد توسعه در راستای توسعة پایدار محلی (مطالعة موردی: پروژة بین‌المللی RFLDL، شهرستان سرایان). نشریه پژوهش‌های روستایی، 6(3)، 545-566. https://doi.org/10.22059/jrur.2015.56060
  8. قربانی، مهدی؛ عوض پور، لیلا و سیرمی راد، مرضیه. (1397). تحلیل و ارزیابی سرمایه اجتماعی درون‌گروهی در راستای توسعه پایدار روستایی (منطقه موردمطالعه: استان کرمان، شهرستان ریگان). مطالعات و تحقیقات اجتماعی در ایران، 7(1)، 1-23. https://doi.org/10.22059/jisr.2018.135399.288
  9. Akbari, E., & Avazpour, L. (2022). Analyzing the Dynamics of Social Capital in Development and Empowerment of Local Communities in Arid Areas; Application of Social Network Analysis. Journal of Range and Watershed Managment75(3), 333-345. https://doi.org/10.22059/jrwm.2022.351397.1685 [In Persian].
  10. Ashtari, H., Ghorbani, M., Khorasani, M. A., & Ghafari, S. (2024). Dynamic Analysis of Organizational Cohesion in the Implementation of the Development and Advancement Rural Plan (Case Study: Gachsaran County). Journal of Rural Research15(2), 382-397. https://doi.org/10.22059/jrur.2024.377112.1950 [In Persian].
  11. Avazpour, L., Ghorbani, M., Naderi, A., Fakhar Izadi, N., Azadi, H., & Yazdanparast, M. (2024). Dryland co-management in Kerman province, Iran: a dynamic analysis of social networks. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-023-04346-y
  12. Bogart, L. M., Matovu, J. K., Wagner, G. J., Green, H. D., Storholm, E. D., Klein, D. J., ... & Kambugu, A. (2020). A pilot test of game changers, a social network intervention to empower people with HIV to be prevention advocates in Uganda. AIDS and Behavior24, 2490-2508. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-020-02806-4
  13. Crona, B., Gelcich, S., & Bodin, Ö. (2017). The importance of interplay between leadership and social capital in shaping outcomes of rights-based fisheries governance. World Development91, 70-83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2016.10.006.
  14. Ebrahimiazarkharan, F., Ghorbani, M., Malekian, A., & Bressers, H. T. A. (2020). Analyzing stakeholders’ network to water resources co-management at a watershed scale: A case study from the Taleghan watershed in Iran. Networks in water governance, 239-265. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-46769-2_9
  15. Edwards Jr, D. B. (2019). Shifting the perspective on community-based management of education: From systems theory to social capital and community empowerment. International journal of educational development64, 17-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2018.11.004
  16. Farida, U. (2021). Local social capital for community empowerment poor rural (PNPM-MD) in Kalumpang district Mamuju regency. In ICSTIAMI 2019: Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Science and Technology in Administration and Management Information, ICSTIAMI 2019, 17-18 July 2019, Jakarta, Indonesia (p. 430). European Alliance for Innovation. http://dx.doi.org/10.4108/eai.17-7-2019.2303565
  17. Farkas, T. (2021). The role of the social capital in rural development. Case study analysis of village research camps in Romania and Hungary. European Countryside13(3), 584-598. https://sciendo.com/article/10.2478/euco-2021-0033
  18. Fisher, R. (2013). ‘A gentleman's handshake’: The role of social capital and trust in transforming information into usable knowledge. Journal of Rural studies31, 13-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2013.02.006
  19. Ghaffari, G., & Ramezani, H. (2013). Social Capital (Translate in Persian). Kavir publication. [In Persian].
  20. Ghorbani, M. (2020). An analysis of validation of livability constructs of the local communities (Case study: Ghale Ganj district). Iranian Journal of Agricultural Economics and Development Research51(2), 243-261. https://doi.org/10.22059/ijaedr.2019.281534.668755 [In Persian].
  21. Ghorbani, M., Avazpour, L., Rahimi, M., Mousavi, H., & Esmaeli, B. (2018a). Analysis of bonding social capital towards co-management of dry lands. Iranian Journal of Range and Desert Research25(2), 378-387. https://doi.org/10.22092/ijrdr.2018.116849
  22. Ghorbani, M., Awadpour, L., & Sirmi Rad, M. (2018b) Analysis and evaluation of intra-group social capital in line with sustainable rural development (Kerman province-Rigan County). Social Studies and Research in Iran7(1), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.22059/jisr.2018.135399.288 [In Persian].
  23. Ghorbani, M., Bouzarjomehri, K., Evazpour, L., & Mansouri, Z. (2017). The efficacy of community-based management approach toward strengthening bridging social capital and reducing social exclusion (Case Study: Rigan County, Kerman Province). Journal of Research and Rural Planning6(2), 157-169. https://doi.org/10.22067/jrrp.v6i2.58795 [In Persian].
  24. Ghorbani, M., Esmaeili, B., Akbari, E., Yazdanparast, M., & Avazpour, L. (2024). Measuring the adaptive capacity of rangeland users under drought stress in North-eastern Iran: application of social network analysis. Journal of Arid Environments225, 105254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaridenv.2024.105254
  25. Ghorbani, M., Evazpour, L., & Khorasani, M. A. (2015). Analysis and assessment of “Social capital in small development networks” towards local sustainable development (Case study: International RFLDL project-Sarayan Township, South Khorasan, Iran). Journal of Rural Research6(3), 545-566. https://doi.org/10.22059/jrur.2015.56060 [In Persian].
  26. Gonzalez, M., Sanders-Jackson, A., & Henriksen, L. (2019). Social capital and tobacco retail outlet density: an empirical test of the relationship. American Journal of Health Promotion33(7), 1020-1027. https://doi.org/10.1177/0890117119853716
  27. Hamdan, H., Yusof, F., & Marzukhi, M. A. (2014). Social capital and quality of life in urban neighborhoods high density housing. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences153, 169-179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.10.051
  28. Islam, M. R., & Morgan, W. J. (2012). Non-governmental organizations in Bangladesh: their contribution to social capital development and community empowerment. Community Development Journal47(3), 369-385. http://www.jstor.org/stable/26166039
  29. Kocho-Schellenberg, J. E., & Berkes, F. (2015). Tracking the development of co-management: using network analysis in a case from the Canadian Arctic. Polar Record51(4), 422-431. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0032247414000436
  30. Lin, X., Lu, R., Guo, L., & Liu, B. (2019). Social capital and mental health in rural and urban China: a composite hypothesis approach. International journal of environmental research and public health16(4), 665. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16040665
  31. Mandulangi, J. (2021, April). Maximizing of local community empowerment based on social capital coordination action in tourism development. In International Conference on Applied Science and Technology on Social Science (ICAST-SS 2020) (pp. 1-5). Atlantis Press, volume 544. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.210424.001
  32. Masud-All-Kamal, M., Nursey-Bray, M., & Hassan, S. M. (2021). Challenges to building social capital through planned adaptation: Evidence from rural communities in Bangladesh. Current Research in Environmental Sustainability3, 100091. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crsust.2021.100091
  33. Meyer, M. L. (2019). Social by default: characterizing the social functions of the resting brain. Current directions in psychological science28(4), 380-386. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721419857759
  34. Navarro-Navarro, L. A., Moreno-Vazquez, J. L., & Scott, C. A. (2017). Social networks for management of water scarcity: Evidence from the San Miguel Watershed, Sonora, Mexico. Water Alternatives10(1), 41. http://www.water-alternatives.org/index.php/alldoc/articles/vol10/v10issue1/341-a10-1-3/file
  35. Primmer, E., & Kyllönen, S. (2006). Goals for public participation implied by sustainable development, and the preparatory process of the Finnish National Forest Programme. Forest policy and Economics8(8), 838-853. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2005.01.002
  36. Rahimi, M., Ghorbani, M., & Azadi, H. (2023). Structural characteristics of governmental and non-governmental institutions network: case of water governance system in Kor River basin in Iran. Environment, Development and Sustainability25(7), 7029-7045. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-022-02346-y
  37. Ramezani, S. & Rahimi, M. (2024). Air Pollution Governance System: Application of Organizational Network Analysis in Clean Air Law Implementation. Natural Resource Governance, 1(1): 40-50. https://doi.org/10.22059/jnrg.2024.367281.1005 [In Persian]
  38. Ramón-Hidalgo, A. E., Harshaw, H. W., Kozak, R. A., & Tindall, D. B. (2020). What a Small Group of People Can (’t) Do: An Analysis of Capable Agents for the Mobilization of Social Capital in Two Ghanaian Ecotourism Projects. Sociology of Development6(3), 338-367. https://doi.org/10.1525/sod.2020.6.3.338
  39. Setini, M., Yasa, N. N. K., Supartha, I. W. G., Giantari, I. G. A. K., & Rajiani, I. (2020). The passway of women entrepreneurship: Starting from social capital with open innovation, through to knowledge sharing and innovative performance. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity6(2), 25. https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc6020025
  40. Williams, G., Omankuttan, U., Devika, J., & Aasen, B. (2018). Enacting participatory, gender-sensitive slum redevelopment? Urban governance, power and participation in Trivandrum, Kerala. Geoforum96, 150-159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2018.07.021