سیاست‏های‏ قانونی توسعه روستایی در اندونزی: تبدیل روستاها به عامل توسعه

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسنده

دفتر مطالعات سیاسی، معاونت پژوهش‏های سیاسی و حقوقی، مرکز پژوهش‏های مجلس، تهران، ایران

چکیده

توسعه روستایی یک فرایند چندسطحی، چند کنشگر و چندوجهی است که به تعداد زیادی از فرایندهای به‌هم‌پیوسته متکی است و تحقق آن مستلزم درنظرگرفتن جنبه‏های مختلف نظیر فاکتورهای سیاسی، اقتصادی، اجتماعی، قانونی و محیطی است. به‏ویژه توسعه روستایی نیازمند وجود احکام قانونی مستحکم است. کشور اندونزی که به دلیل سیاست تمرکززدایی عمیق در دنیا معروف است، طی سال‏های اخیر تمرکززدایی در مقیاس روستا را موردتوجه قرار داده و دستور کار توسعه خود را به سمت توسعه روستایی سوق داده است. در این راستا «قانون 6/2014، جمهوری اندونزی درباره روستا» به‏مثابه سیاست ملی اندونزی برای توسعه روستایی جامعه‏محور تصویب شده است. ازجمله اهداف این قانون تبدیل روستاها از هدف توسعه به عامل توسعه است. مقاله حاضر که ازمنظر هدف از نوع تحقیقات کاربردی است و از روش تحلیل محتوای جهت‏دار با رویکرد تشریح بهره می‏گیرد، قصد پاسخ به این سؤال را دارد که دولت اندونزی برای تبدیل روستاها به عامل توسعه چه استراتژی‏های قانونی را اتخاذ کرده است. یافته‏های پژوهش نشان می‏دهد ایجاد ترتیبات نهادی قوی با اختیارات گسترده از طریق سیاست تمرکززدایی؛ الزام به برنامه‏ریزی توسعه روستایی با «رویکرد پایین‌به‌بالا»؛ اتخاذ سازوکارهای چندگانه برای مشارکت جامعه در اداره و نیز تحقق توسعه روستا؛ و تمرکززدایی مالی و انتقال منابع مالی پایدار به روستاها، چهار استراتژی اصلی دولت اندونزی برای توسعه روستایی است. به‏ویژه سازوکار قانونی تعیین‏شده در خصوص تخصیص مستقیم اعتبارات به روستاها در دنیا منحصربه‏فرد است. تجربه اندونزی نشان می‏دهد رویکرد ایده‏آل برای توسعه روستایی یک مدل از پایین‌به‌بالا است که با هدایت، راهبری، نظارت و تسهیل دولت تکمیل شود.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله [English]

Legal Policies of Rural Development in Indonesia: Transforming Villages to Subjects of Development

نویسنده [English]

  • Fatemeh Sadat Mirahmadi
Political Studies office, Deputy Director of Political and Legal Research, Islamic Parliament Research Center, Tehran, Iran
چکیده [English]

A B S T R A C T
Rural development is a multi-level, multi-actor, and multifaceted process, dependent on a large number of interconnected processes. Its realization requires consideration of various political, economic, social, environmental, and legal factors. Rural development, in particular, needs robust legal frameworks. Indonesia, renowned for its profound decentralization policies, has focused on decentralization at the village level in recent years and steered its development agenda toward rural development. In this regard, "LAW OF THE REPUBLIC OF INDONESIA NUMBER 6 OF 2014 CONCERNING VILLAGES" was enacted as the national policy of this country for community-based rural development. One of the main objectives of this law is to transform villages from mere objects into subjects of development. This study, which is an applied research study in terms of its purpose,  employs a Directed Content Analysis method with an Explication approach, seeking to answer the question of what legal strategies the Indonesian government has adopted to turn villages into subjects of development. The research findings indicate that establishing robust institutional arrangements with extensive authority through decentralization policies, mandating rural development planning with a "bottom-up approach," adopting multiple mechanisms for the participation of the community in the administration and rural development, and financial decentralization through the transfer of sustainable financial resources to villages are the four main strategies of the Indonesian government for rural development. In particular, the legal mechanism established regarding the direct allocation of funds to villages is a unique initiative on a global scale. Indonesia's experience demonstrates that the ideal approach to rural development is a bottom-up model complemented by the guidance, leadership, oversight, and facilitation of the government.
Extended Abstract
Introduction
Rural development is a multi-level, multi-actor, and multifaceted process that relies on a large number of interconnected processes. Its realization requires consideration of various aspects, such as political, economic, social, environmental, and legal factors. In particular, rural development demands the establishment of robust legal frameworks. The present study examines the legal policies for rural development in Indonesia. In recent years, Indonesia has implemented decentralization policies at the village level and shifted its development agenda towards rural development. In this context, the Government of Indonesia enacted "law of the republic of indonesia number 6 of 2014 concerning villages," which serves as the country's national policy for community-based rural development. This study seeks to address the key question of what strategies law 6/2014 on Villages and its derivative regulations have prescribed for transforming villages from objects of development into subjects of development.
 
Methodology
This research is an applied study in terms of purpose,  employing a Directed Content Analysis method with an Explication approach. The data for the research includes legal documents (such as government laws and regulations), reports from research institutions, and academic texts. Data collection was carried out through library resources and online databases.
 
Results and discussion
The Indonesian government has institutionalized four key strategies in law 6/2014 to transform villages into subjects of development: 
First, robust institutional arrangements with extensive authority were adopted. Law 6/2014 triggered significant changes in rural governance in Indonesia, transforming the status of villages from mere administrative units under the regency/municipality to independent entities with the authority to regulate and manage their own governmental affairs and community interests. By freeing villages from the jurisdiction of higher government levels, the law grants broad powers to them. To enable villages to exercise such extensive authority, the law envisions the establishment of empowered, capable, and authoritative village governments.
Second, the law mandates a "bottom-up" development planning model. The village development plan is formulated and approved by the rural government with the participation of the rural community. In this model, the community targets the fund allocation based on their developmental needs, encouraging alignment between the people's needs and governmental programs.
Third, the law places significant emphasis on community participation in realizing development. Such participation is evident from the planning stage to all stages of the decision-making, implementation, and monitoring processes. The law provides for several mechanisms, including the establishment of a village consultative assembly, which includes the village head, village council, and all stakeholders from various socio-economic and cultural groups in the village to discuss and make decisions on strategic issues related to village governance. This assembly is designated as the highest decision-making body in the village, tasked with approving critical decisions made by the village government. The law also mandates annual reporting by the village head to the community regarding village governance at the end of each fiscal year and grants the community the right to provide input on draft village regulations.
Fourth, the most unique strategy institutionalized by the Indonesian government for rural development in this law is financial decentralization and the provision of sustainable financial resources to villages to realize development. In addition to the village's income and financial transfers from city/regency governments, which were stipulated by previous laws, the law mandates financial support for villages through allocations from the national budget. According to the law, the government must allocate 10 percent of all annual transfers to regional governments directly to the villages.
Realizing the capacities of villages requires viewing them as independent legal entities, having an efficient local institution to manage village affairs, and possessing the authority to regulate administrative, financial, and other matters. It also demands an appropriate mechanism for establishing connections between village governance and higher levels of government, a proper approach to rural development, and development programs with clear timeframes. Additionally, efficient human resources, specialized expertise, sustainable financial resources to fulfill duties and exercise authority, and the creation of infrastructure for delivering services to the village community are essential. An examination of Indonesia's Law 6/2014 on Villages reveals that all these elements have been addressed in the legislation.
 
Conclusion
Indonesia's Law 6/2014 on Villages represents a shift from a state-based development discourse, in which the government plays a key role in directing rural development, to a community-based discourse where the village and rural community lead the development process. Although Indonesia has adopted administrative and financial decentralization at the village level and a community-based development approach as a national policy for achieving rural development, national and regional institutions still play a crucial role in its implementation. Indonesia's experience demonstrates that the ideal approach to rural development is bottom-up, complemented by government guidance, oversight, facilitation, and support.
 
Funding
There is no funding support.
 
Authors’ Contribution
Authors contributed equally to the conceptualization and writing of the article. All of the authors approved the content of the manuscript and agreed on all aspects of the work declaration of competing interest none.
 
Conflict of Interest
Author declared no conflict of interest.
 
 
Acknowledgments
The author would like to thank the Islamic Parliament Research Center for providing the opportunity to conduct this research.
 

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Indonesia
  • Rural Development
  • Institutional Arrangements
  • Sustainable Financial Resources
  • Community Participation
  1.    احمدی شاپورآبادی، محمدعلی و متقی، سیده لیلا (1401). ارزشیابی خط‏مشی توسعه روستایی در برنامه ششم توسعه: آموزه‏هایی برای تدوین خط‏مشی نوین توسعه روستایی در برنامه هفتم توسعه. نشریه علمی فرایند مدیریت و توسعه، 35 (3)، 129-164 doi:10.52547/jmdp.35.3.129
  2.    عیدیوندی، کاظم؛ قانع، علیرضا؛ فرشاد، الناز و محمدی جعفرآبادی، فاطمه. (1402). تدوین سناریوها و استراتژی‏های توسعه روستایی کشور در افق 1404 با رویکرد آینده‌پژوهی. فصلنامه چشم‏انداز شهرهای آینده، 4(1)، 61-76. 10.
  3.    قربانی، مهدی؛ گرکانی، سید امیرحسین؛ عوض‎پور، لیلا؛ یزدان‏پرست، مریم و امیری، سجاد (1403). پویایی‏شناسی سرمایه اجتماعی ذی‌نفعان محلی در راستای مدیریت مشارکتی روستایی مطالعه موردی: شهرستان گچساران. مجله پژوهش‏های روستایی، 15(3)، 109-125. 10. 2059/jrur.2025.373794.1924 doi
  4.    یاری‏حصار، ارسطو؛ بوچانی، محمدحسین؛ مهدوی، داوود و پریشان، مجید (1392). تدوین راهبردهای توسعه مدیریت روستایی ایران با استفاده از رویکرد برنامه‏ریزی استراتژیک. مجله پژوهش‏های روستایی، 4 (4)، 691-714. doi:10.22059/jrur.2013.50416
  5. Adi, N., (2022). Three essays on village development in Indonesia, (Doctoral dissertation, The University of Western Australia. Perth). Retrieved from https://api.research-repository.uwa.edu.au/ws/portalfiles/portal/191725725/THESIS_DOCTOR_OF_PHILOSOPHY_ADI_Nugraha_2022.pdf
  6. Antlöv, H., Wetterberg, A., & Dharmawan, L. (2016). Village governance, community life, and the 2014 village law in Indonesia. Bulletin of Indonesian economic studies, 52(2), 161-183. https://doi.org/10.1080/00074918.2015.1129047
  7. Amsari, F., Simabura, C., & Illahi, B. K. (2023). Content Material for the Nagari Regulation Based on the Rights of Origin According to Law 6 of 2014. In Regulatory Reform in Indonesia A Legal Perspective,. Edited by Ekatjahjana, w., Hauerstein, K. & Heilmann, D. Jakarta: Hanns Seidel Foundation. 273-303
  8.  Azmi, S., Nuryartono, N., & Binenbaum, E. (2020). Rural Development Policy And Poverty Alleviation: The Case Of Village Funds In Aceh Province, Indonesia. Info Artha, 4(2), 136-154. https://doi.org/10.31092/jia.v4i2.735
  9. Ahmadi Shapourabadi, M., & Mottaghi, S. L. (2022). Pathology and Monitoring of Rural Development Policies in Development Plans: Lessons for Developing Rural Development Executive Policies in the Seventh Development Plan. JMDP35(3), 129-164. doi:10.52547/jmdp.35.3.129 [In pesian]
  10. Bismo, P. A., & Sahputra, R. E. (2019). Increasing the Effectiveness of Village Development Through the Simplification of Village Funds Disbursement. Matra Pembaruan, 5(2), 77-88.
  11. Esfandiari, F., & Al-Fatih, S. (2020, September). Village Laws Dilemma: What Can the Village of Indonesia Do?. In International Conference on Law Reform (INCLAR 2019).13-16. Batu City, Indonesia. Atlantis Press. doi: 10.2991/aebmr.k.200226.003
  12. Ernawati, E., Tajuddin, T., & Nur, S. (2021). Does government expenditure affect regional inclusive growth? An experience of implementing village fund policy in Indonesia. Economies, 9(4), 164-176. https://doi.org/10.3390/economies9040164
  13.      Eidivandi, K., Ghane, A., Farshad, E., & Mohamadi Jafaabadi, F. (2023). Developing the country's rural development scenarios and strategies on Horizon 1414 with a future research approach. Journal of Future cities vision. 4(1): 61-76. doi:10.61186/jvfc.4.1.61  [In pesian]
  14. Gupta, R. (2022). Identification of Suitable Rural Development Indicators. SIAM International Journal, 1(01), 11-22. https://doi.org/10.36018/dsiij.v19i.238
  15. Galindo Caldés, R., Santasusagna Riu, A., & Tort, J. (2020). Regional Administrative Boundaries and the Building of Internal Borders in Decentralised States. The Case of Two Spanish Interregional Borders. Contemporary Trends in Local Governance: Reform, Cooperation and Citizen Participation, 131-150. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-52516-3_7
  16. Ghorbani, M. Garakani, S. A., Avazpour, L., Yazdanparast, M., Amiri, M. (2024). Social Capital Dynamic of Local Stakeholder Network in Rural Co-Management: the case study of Gachsaran county. Journal of Rural Research, 15 (3), 109-125. doi: 10.22059/jrur.2025.373794.1924 [In pesian]
  17. Harahap, H. I., Ridwan, M., & Lubis, F. H. (2017). The Various Impacts Related to Implementation of Village Law No. 6/2014. In 2nd International Conference on Social and Political Development (ICOSOP 2017) (pp. 231-235). Medan, Indonesia. Atlantis Press. doi: 10.2991/icosop-17.2018.36
  18.  Hilmawan, R., Aprianti, Y., Vo, D. T. H., Yudaruddin, R., Bintoro, R. F. A., Fitrianto, Y., & Wahyuningsih, N. (2023). Rural development from village funds, village-owned enterprises, and village original income. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 9(4), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joitmc.2023.100159
  19. Hutahaean, M. (2020, October). Policy of development from outskirts: analysis of budgeting for village funds in Indonesia. In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Environmental Governance, ICONEG 2019, 25-26 October 2019, Makassar, South Sulawesi, Indonesia. http://dx.doi.org/10.4108/eai.25-10-2019.2300502
  20. Horzsa, G. (2021). Rural Development and Migration. (Doctoral dissertation, Corvinus University of Budapest, Budapest). Retrieved from http://phd.lib.uni-corvinus.hu/1187/1/Horzsa_Gergely_den.pdf
  21. Haug, M., Rössler, M., & Grumblies, A. T. (2016). Introduction: contesting and reformulating centre–periphery relations in Indonesia. In Rethinking power relations in Indonesia. Edited by Haug, M., Rössler, M. & Grumblies , A. T. 1-25. England: Routledge.
  22.  explanation of The Law No.6/2014 (2014). penjelasan atas undang-undang republik indonesia nomor 6 tahun 2014 tentang desa. Retrieved 12.12.2023 from www.peraturan.go.id
  23. Kusumastuti, R., & Asmara, A. Y. (2019- Februray). Village Authority and Local Innovation to Accelerate Rural Development In Indonesia: Review of Indonesian Act Number 6/2014 And Law of Government Number 38/2017. In The 9th International Conference Rural Research & Planning Group. July 6-8, 2018. 165-174. Bali, Indonesia..
  24. Jacqueline, V. E. L., Zakaria, Y., & Bedner, A. (2017). Law-making as a strategy for change: Indonesia’s new Village Law. Asian Journal of Law and Society, 4(2), 447-471. doi:10.1017/als.2017.21
  25. Lewis, B. D. (2015). Decentralising to villages in Indonesia: Money (and other) mistakes. Public Administration and Development, 35(5), 347-359. DOI:10.1002/pad.1741
  26. Putra, F. (2022). Village development initiative as an alternative strategy of rural poverty reduction: An evaluation of village fund program in Indonesia. International Journal of Social Science and Human Research, 5(04), 1453-1460. DOI:10.47191/ijsshr/v5-i4-35
  27. Putri, R. Y. (2019). The village governance model that empowers communities in indonesia's border areas. Journal of Urban Sociology, 2(1), 16-27. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30742/jus.v2i1.608
  28. Putri, A. R. D., Saputri, S. R., & Manurung, H. (2023). implementation of village autonomy policy based on law number 6 of 2014. Journal of humanities, social and business, 2(3), 482-492. https://doi.org/10.55047/jhssb.v2i3.650
  29. Phahlevy, R. R., & Multazam, M. T. (2018). The shifting of village autonomy concept in Indonesia. Opcion, 34(85), 2865-2885. DOI:10.31235/osf.io/z8288.
  30. Rudy, R., Hasyimzum, Y., Khoiriah, S., & Roro, W. P. (2021, June). The Possibility of Village Development: Village Regulation Formulation and Its Challenges. Paper presented at Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Fundamental Rights, I-COFFEES 2019, 5-6 August 2019, Bandar Lampung, Lampung, Indonesia.
  31. Rosyid, M. (2015). Aplikasi UU Nomor 6 Tahun 2014 Dalam Mewujudkan Kesejahteraan Masyarakat Perdesaan. YUDISIA: Jurnal Pemikiran Hukum dan Hukum Islam, 6(2), 360-393. http://dx.doi.org/10.21043/yudisia.v6i2.1376
  32. Saragi, N. B., Muluk, M. K., & Sentanu, I. G. E. P. S. (2021). Indonesia’s Village Fund Program: Does It Contribute to Poverty Reduction?. Jurnal Bina Praja: Journal of Home Affairs Governance, 13(1), 65-80. DOI:10.21787/jpb.13.2021.65-80
  33.     Sambodo, M. T., Hidayat, S., Rahmayanti, A. Z., Handoyo, F. W., Yuliana, C. I., Hidayatina, A., Rahmayanti, A.Z., Handoyo, F. W. & Astuty, E. D. (2023). Towards a New approach to community-based rural development: Lesson learned from Indonesia. Cogent Social Sciences, 9(2), 1-17. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4911244
  34. Setiawan, T., Himura, E. K., Irawan, A. N., & Halim, H. A. (2023). Rural Development in Indonesia: Ecological Crisis, Marginalization, and the Emerging Ecological Governance. Euroasia Journal of  social Sciences & humanities, 10(34), 55-73. http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10029939
  35. Syukri, M., Bachtiar, P. P., Kurniawan, A., Sedyadi, G. S. M., Diningrat, R. A., & Alifia, U. (2017). Study on the Implementation of Law No. 6/2014 on Villages. The SMERU Research Institute Report. 1-119 Retrieved 0 12.05.2024 from https://www.smeru.or.id/sites/default/files/publication/baselineuudesa_en.pdf.
  36. Sinarwati, N. K., & Marhaeni, A. A. I. N. (2019). The role of village own enterprises to rural development. South East Asia Journal of Contemporary Business, Economics and Law, 18(5), 2289-1560.
  37.     Sirajuddin, T. (2020, February). Rural development strategies in Indonesia: Managing villages to achieve sustainable development. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. 447 (1) p. 012066). Surakarta, Indonesia, IOP Publishing. DOI:10.1088/1755-1315/447/1/012066
  38. Sisk, T. D. (2001). Democracy at the local level: The international IDEA handbook on participation, representation, conflict management, and governance. Stockholm: International IDEA
  39. Susilo, A. (2016). Toward mainstreaming and sustaining community-driven development in Indonesia understanding local initiatives and the transition from the national rural community empowerment program to the village law.pp1-66. Asian development Bank Report. Retrieved 12.12.2023 from https://repub.eur.nl/pub/95350/mainstreaming-cdd-indonesia.pdf
  40. Talitha, T., Firman, T., & Hudalah, D. (2020). Welcoming two decades of decentralization in Indonesia: a regional development perspective. Territory, Politics, Governance, 8(5), 690-708. https://doi.org/10.1080/21622671.2019.1601595
  41. The Law No.6 (2014. (undang-undang republik indonesia nomor 6 tahun 2014 tentang desa. retrieved 12.12.2023 from www.peraturan.go.id
  42. The Law No. 23 (2014. (undang-undang republik indonesia nomor 23 tahun 2014 tentang pemerintahan daerah. retrieved 02/010/2023 from https://peraturan.go.id/files/uu23-2014bt.pdf
  43.     The regulation No. 43 (2014). peraturan pemerintah republik indonesia nomor 43 tahun 2014 tentang peraturan pelaksanaan undang-undang nomor 6 tahun 2014 tentang desa. retrieved 17/12/2023 from www.djpp.kemenkumham.go.id.
  44. The regulation No. 22 (2015). peraturan pemerintah republik indonesia nomor 22 tahun 2015 tentang perubahan atas peraturan pemerintah nomor 60 tahun 2014 tentang dana desa yang bersumber dari anggaran. retrieved 12.12.2023 from www.peraturan.go.id
  45. Vel, J. A., & Bedner, A. W. (2015). Decentralisation and village governance in Indonesia: the return to the nagari and the 2014 Village Law. The Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law, 47(3), 493-507. https://doi.org/10.1080/07329113.2015.1109379
  46. Wijaya, Y. A., & Ishihara, K. (2018). The evolution of community-driven development policy and community preferences for rural development after the enactment of Village Law 6/2014: A case study of Indragiri Hulu Regency, Riau Province, Indonesia. Policy Science, Policy Science Association of Ritsumeikan University, 25(2), 45-70. https://doi.org/10.34382/00005203
  47. Wubayehu, T. Z. (2020). Conceptualizing rural development in the twenty-first century. International Journal of Agricultural Extension and Rural Development Studies, 7(4), 18-26.  DOI:10.33545/26180723.2021.v4.i1a.65
  48. Zekić, S., Kleut, Ž., & Matkovski, B. (2017). An analysis of key indicators of rural development in Serbia: A comparison with EU countries. Economic Annals, 62(214), 107-120. https://doi.org/10.2298/EKA1714107Z
  49. Yarihesar, A., Boochani, M.H., Mahdavi, M., & Parisan, M. (2014). Formulation of Development Strategies in Rural Management of Iran Using Strategic Planning Approach. Journal of Rural Research. 4 (4): 691-714. doi:10.22059/jrur.2013.50416 [In pesian].