واکاوی عوامل موثر بر تغییرات ساختاری-کارکردی روستاهای شهرستان تنکابن

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

گروه ترویج و آموزش کشاورزی، دانشکده علوم زراعی، دانشگاه علوم کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی ساری، ساری، ایران

چکیده

پایداری یا ناپایداری مناطق روستایی، یکی از مباحث اساسی در دستیابی به توسعه پایدار کشور به شمار می‌رود. در این فرایند، توجه به ابعاد اقتصادی، اجتماعی، کالبدی، فضایی و اکولوژیکی روستاها ضروری است. ازاین‌رو، مطالعه حاضر قصد دارد عوامل مؤثر بر تغییرات ساختاری-کارکردی روستاها را در شهرستان تنکابن واکاوی کند. این تحقیق از نوع پیمایشی با رویکرد کمی بود و جامعه آماری آن را خانوارهای روستایی ساکن در روستاهای شهرستان تنکابن (بخش مرکزی) تشکیل دادند که 250 خانوار با استفاده از فرمول دانیل و به روش نمونه‌گیری چندمرحله‌ای با انتساب متناسب  انتخاب شدند. ابزار جمع‌آوری داده‌ها پرسش‌نامه بود که روایی صوری آن توسط گروهی از متخصصان و صاحب‌نظران تأیید شد و برای تعیین پایایی آن از ضریب آلفای کرونباخ استفاده شد که مقدار آن مناسب بود. برای تحلیل داده‌ها از نرم‌افزارهای Win26 SPSS و  SmartPLS V4 بهره گرفته شد. یافته‌های بخش انعکاسی مدل ارزیابی نشان داد که روایی همگرا و تشخیصی سازه‌ها در حد مناسب برآورد شدند. نتایج حاصل از مدل مؤلفه‌های سلسله‌مراتبی بر روی 55 متغیر تغییرات ساختاری-کارکردی پنج عامل را شناسایی کرد. باتوجه‌به مقدار ضرایب مسیر به ترتیب سازه‌های عوامل سیاسی- نهادی (452/0)، عوامل فیزیکی- کالبدی (409/0) و سپس عوامل اجتماعی- فرهنگی (289/0) از مهم‌ترین سازه‌های مؤثر بر تغییرات ساختاری-کارکردی روستاها بودند. این نتایج بر اهمیت برنامه‌ریزی جامع و مشارکت‌محور برای بهبود وضعیت روستاها و جلوگیری از بروز تغییرات ساختاری-کارکردی منفی در روستاهای موردمطالعه تأکید می­کند.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله [English]

The Analysis of Effective Factors on Structural-functional Changes in Rural Areas of the Tonekabon County

نویسندگان [English]

  • Samareh Soleymaninezad
  • Omid Jamshidi
  • Fatemeh Shafiee
Department of Agricultural Extension & Education, Faculty of Crop Sciences, Sari University of Agriculture and Natural Resource, Sari, Iran
چکیده [English]

A B S T R A C T
The sustainability or instability of rural areas is one of the fundamental issues in achieving the sustainable development of a country. In this process, attention to the economic, social, physical, spatial, and ecological dimensions of rural areas is inevitable. Therefore, the present study aims to investigate the factors affecting the structural-functional changes of villages in Tonekabon County. This research was a survey conducted using a quantitative approach; the statistical population consisted of rural households residing in the villages of Tonekabon County (central district), with 250 households selected using Daniel's formula and a multistage sampling method with proportional assignment. The data collection tool was a questionnaire in which a panel of experts and specialists confirmed its face validity, and its reliability was determined using Cronbach's alpha coefficient, which was found to be appropriate. For data analysis, SPSSV26 and SmartPLSV4 software were used. The findings of the reflective evaluation model showed that the convergent and discriminant validity of the constructs were estimated to be appropriate. The results of the hierarchical component model identified five factors among 55 variables of structural-functional changes. Based on the path coefficients, the political-institutional factors (0.452), physical-structural factors (0.409), and socio-cultural factors (0.289) were the most influential constructs on the structural-functional changes of villages. These results emphasize the importance of comprehensive and participatory planning to improve the condition of villages and prevent negative structural-functional changes in the studied villages.
Extended Abstract
Introduction
Nowadays, structural-functional changes in the villages often have negative consequences. Some of these changes have caused the instability of the rural communities and settlements, which is a serious threat to the development phenomenon. The sustainability or instability of rural areas is a key issue in achieving sustainable development in a country.  This development should encompass economic, social, spatial, and physical aspects of the villages, as well as their changes over time. Structural-functional changes refer to the changes that occur in the structural and functional fields of the villages and possess profound impacts on the way of life, economy, and social organization in these areas. These changes comprise changes in the economic structure, such as the transition from traditional agriculture to non-agricultural activities, alterations in the social and family structure, and changes in social and economic roles. They could also encompass development policies, immigration, technology, and economic issues.  Moreover, there are changes that are distinguishable in the infrastructure, institutions, and livelihood methods of the villages. In terms of agriculture, Mazandaran province is one of the leading provinces of the country, having an important part in crop and livestock production. Nevertheless, the rural and agricultural areas of this province have faced many problems in recent years. The villages of Tankabon County are not exempted from this rule, especially in the areas close to the urban spheres. In fact, they are among the areas that have undergone extensive changes in their economic structure and function over the last few decades. These villages have experienced significant structural-functional changes; so, during the last five years, 10% of the agricultural and horticultural lands of the county have changed their use and have been removed from the production cycle. Many county villages have already lost their agricultural function and turned into recreational garden villas due to natural attractions, tourism purposes, and increased land prices in recent years. Hence, the present study attempted to investigate the factors influencing functional changes in the rural areas of Tonekabon County.
 
Methodology
The data required for this descriptive-analytical research was gathered through a survey. The statistical population was the rural households residing in the villages of Tonekabon County (central district) (N=10737), and the sample size was determined using the Daniel formula. Based on that, 255 questionnaires were distributed, of which 250 of them were returned. The respondents were selected using a multi-stage proportional stratified random sampling method. The data collection instrument was the questionnaire. A panel of experts in the fields of agricultural extension, education, and rural development confirmed its face and content validity. The reliability of its scales was also evaluated through a pilot study. Cronbach's alpha coefficients indicated the appropriate reliability of the scales used in the research. The SPSSV26 and SmartPLSV4 software were applied for data analysis.  
 
Results and discussion
The findings in the descriptive statistics section showed that the majority of respondents (89.2%) were male, and their average age was 42 years. In terms of education level, most of the participants had a school diploma. In terms of occupation, 80.8% of them had agricultural profession as their second career. Considering the findings of the reflective part of the evaluation model,  the convergent and diagnostic validity of the constructs were estimated at an appropriate level. Based on the results of the hierarchical components model, a total of five factors were identified to be effective on 37 variables of the structural-functional changes in rural areas. These factors included political-institutional, physical-spatial, socio-cultural, economic-livelihood, and environmental-ecological factors. Correspondingly, reflective modeling used in the study revealed that the most significant factors affecting structural-functional changes in the villages were political-institutional factors (0.452), physical-spatial factors (0.409), and socio-cultural factors (0.289).
 
Conclusion
In sum,  according to the factors identified for the growth and sustainable development of the agricultural sector, the provision of agricultural and rural sustainable development in the aforementioned area is recommended. This must be accomplished by adopting a comprehensive and systematic approach, considering the county's conditions, and exploiting the potential and opportunities in the county's geographical area. Furthermore, proper policymaking,  improvement of administrative structures, and governmental support of agriculture and other rural economic activities seem to be indispensable. Additionally, attention to cultural and social changes and the advancement of local institutions can lead to stronger sustainable development and improved circumstances in rural areas. Policymakers and program planners are expected to consider these factors and materialize effective measures to enhance rural areas' economic and social conditions.
 
Funding
There is no funding support.
 
Authors’ Contribution
The authors contributed equally to the conceptualization and writing of the article. All of the authors approved the content of the manuscript and agreed on all aspects of the work declaration of competing interest none.
 
Conflict of Interest
The authors declared no conflict of interest.
 
Acknowledgments
The paper has extracted from the Ms.c thesis of the first author in the Department of Agricultural Extension & Education, Faculty of Crop Sciences, Sari University of Agriculture and Natural Resource.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Development
  • Agriculture
  • Rural Settlements
  • Land use
  • Hierarchical Analysis
  1. احمدی، سودابه؛ صادقلو، طاهره و شایان، حمید. (1403). واکاوی تأثیر توسعه گردشگری در بازساخت نواحی روستایی (موردمطالعه: روستاهای شهرستان طرقبه شاندیز). پژوهش‌های روستائی، 15(2)، 281-260. doi: 10.22059/jrur.2024.366442.1873
  2. اصلانی سنگده، بیتا و امینی، عباس. (1400). تحلیل ساختاری دگرگونی‌های روستائیت کشاورزی در استان اصفهان. پژوهش­های روستائی، 12(4)، 767-750. doi: 10.22059/jrur.2021.325709.1648
  3. احمـــدی، شیرکو. (1399). بررسی عوامل مؤثر بر سکونتگاه‌های زیستی روستایی (مطالعه موردی: شهرستان سردشت). پایداری، توسعه و محیط‌زیست، 1(1)، 50-29. doi: 20.1001.1.24233846.1399.1.1.3.7
  4. جمالی پور، محسن؛ شاهپوری، احمدرضا و قربانی، محمد. (1394). عوامل مؤثر بر شکل‌گیری تغییر کاربری اراضی در استان مازندران (مطالعه موردی: شهرستان تنکابن). اقتصاد و توسعه کشاورزی، 29 (2)، 115-107. doi:10.22067/jead2.v0i0.27902
  5. حیدری، زهرا؛ بدری، سید علی؛ رضوانی، محمدرضا و دربان آستانه، علیرضا. (1401). تحلیل نگرش‌ها و گرایش‌های گردشگران نسبت به گردشگری کشاورزی مبتنی بر جامعه محلی (منطقه موردمطالعه: روستاهای شهرستان تنکابن). برنامه‌ریزی و توسعه گردشگری، 11(40)،40-7.  doi: 10.22080/jtpd.2022.20965.3483
  6. ریاحی، وحید؛ کرمی نسب، صدیقه و بیات، مقصود. (1397). بررسی عوامل مؤثر بر تحولات ساختاری- کارکردی سکونتگاه‌های روستایی (موردمطالعه: بخش کردیان- شهرستان جهرم). راهبردهای توسعه روستایی، 5 (2)، 196-173. doi: 10.22048/rdsj.2018.80666.1642
  7. سازمان جهاد کشاورزی استان مازندران. (1401). اداره آمار و اطلاعات.
  8. صدیقی، صابر. (1395). تبیین عوامل تشدیدکننده تغییرات کاربری اراضی (مطالعه موردی: شهرستان محمودآباد). پایان‌نامه کارشناسی‌ارشد جغرافیا و برنامه­ریزی روستایی. گرایش مدیریت توسعه پایدار روستایی. دانشکده جغرافیا، دانشگاه تهران.
  9. عسکری رابری، اباصلت؛ عباس‌زاده، شهاب و آبرون، علی‌اصغر. (1396). ارزیابی تغییرات ساختار معماری مسکن و عرصه حیات در روستاها (مطالعه موردی: روستای ریاب- خراسان رضوی). مسکن و محیط روستا، ۳۶ (۱۵۹)، 50-35.
  10. علیائی، محمدصادق و عزیزی، سمیه. (1398). عوامل مؤثر بر تحولات کارکرد اقتصادی سکونتگاه‌های روستایی در شهرستان ری. اقتصاد فضا و توسعه روستایی، ۸ (۲۷) :238-223.
  11. فاضل‌نیا، غریب و افشار عمرانی، الهام. (1392). تحلیل تأثیر تقاضای اجتماعی بر کاربری اراضی روستاهای شهرستان تنکابن. نشریه جغرافیا و توسعه، 11 (33)، 38-27. doi: 10.22111/gdij.2013.1320.
  12. کاظمی چمسورک، زینب؛ جلالیان، حمید و زنگانه، احمد. (1398). تحلیل تحولات ساختاری ـکارکردی روستاهای در حال گذار شهرستان ایوان. برنامه‌ریزی توسعه کالبدی، 6 (4)، 41-27. doi: 10.30473/psp.2020.6586
  13. کمانرودی کجوری، موسی و قلی‌نیا، صادق. (1398). پراکنده­رویی شهر بابل و تغییرات ساختاری-کارکردی روستاهای پیرامون-مطالعه موردی: روستای "سیاه کلا محله". مطالعات ساختار و کارکرد شهری، 6 (19)، 72-47. doi: 10. 2080/shahr.2019.15550.1697
  14. مرکز آمار ایران. (1395). نتایج تفصیلی سرشماری عمومی نفوس و مسکن. سازمان برنامه‌وبودجه کشور.
  15. مؤمنی، حسن و جولایی، سمیرا. (1402). بازشناسی ساختاری ـ کارکردی روستاهای هالیدی (تعطیلات) در قلمرو کردان. اقتصاد فضا و توسعه روستایی. ۱۲ (۴۶)، 98-85. doi: 10.61186/serd.12.46.85
  16. نصیری زارع، سعید و ریاحی، وحید. (1401). تحلیل رابطه‌ تغییرات کارکردی با ارزش‌های روستایی در نواحی حومه‌ای (موردمطالعه: روستاهای بخش لواسانات شمال تهران). پژوهش‌های جغرافیای اقتصادی،3(8)، 18-1. doi: 20.1001.1.27173747.1401.3.8.1.8
  17. نورانی، محدثهغ آمار، تیمور و قریشی میناآباد، محمد باسط. (1400). تحلیل تغییر کارکرد اقتصادی، تولیدی و صنعتی روستاهای پیراشهری لنگرود. فصلنامه علمی برنامه‌ریزی منطقه‌ای، 11(44)،  268-253.  doi: 10.30495/jzpm.2022.4067
  18. Agriculture Organization of Mazandaran. (2022). Department of Statistics and Information. https://jkmaz.ir/. [In Persian].
  19. Ahmadi, S., Sadeghloo, T., & Shadyan, H. (2024). Analyzing the Impact of Tourism Development on the Reconstruction of Rural Areas (Case Study: Villages of Torghabeh-Shandiz City). Journal of Rural Research, 15(2), 260-281. doi: 10.22059/jrur.2024.366442.1873. [In Persian].
  20. Ahmadi, Sh. (2020).Study of Effective Factors on Rural Biological Settlements (Case Study: Sardasht City). Journal of Sustanble, development & encironment, 1(1), 29-50. doi: 20.1001.1.24233846.1399.1.1.3.7 [In Persian].
  21. Aniah, P., Kaunza-Nu-Dem, M. K., & Ayembilla, J. A. (2019). Smallholder farmers' livelihood adaptation to climate variability and ecological changes in the savanna agro ecological zone of Ghana. Heliyon, 5(4). doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e01492
  22. Askari Raberi, A., Abbaszadeh, Sh., & Abrun, A. (2017). Evaluation of Changes in the Architectural Structure of Housing and Living Spaces in Villages (Case Study: Riyah Village, Razavi Khorasan Province). Housing and Rural Environment, 36(159), 35-50. [in Persian].
  23. Aslani Sangdeh, B. and Amini, A. (2022). Structural Analysis of Agricultural Rurality Evolution in Isfahan Province. Journal of Rural Research12(4), 750-767. doi: 10.22059/jrur.2021.325709.1648 [in Persian].
  24. Chen, S., Mehmood, M. S., Liu, S., & Gao, Y. (2022). Spatial pattern and influencing factors of rural settlements in Qinba Mountains, Shaanxi Province, China. Sustainability14(16), 10095. doi: /10.3390/su141610095
  25. Daniel, W. W. (1999). Biostatistics: A Foundation for Analysis in the Health Sciences.
  26. Fazelneia, G., & Omranei, E. (2013). Analyzing the Effect of Social Demands on Land Uses of the Villages in Tonkabon Township. Geography and Development11(33), 27-38. doi: 10.22111/gdij.2013.1320. [In Persian].
  27. Ge, D., Long, H., Qiao, W., Wang, Z., Sun, D., & Yang, R. (2020). Effects of rural–urban migration on agricultural transformation: A case of Yucheng City, China. Journal of Rural Studies, 76, 85-95. doi: /10.1016/j.jrurstud.2020.04.010
  28. Halfacree, K. (2007). Back‐To‐The‐Land In The Twenty‐First Century – Making Connections With Rurality. Tijdschrift Voor Economische En Sociale Geografie, 98(1), 3–8. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9663.2007.00371.x
  29. Heydari, Z., Badri, S. A. , Rezvani, M. R. , & Darban Astaneh, A.R. (2022). Analysis of tourist's attitudes and tendencies towards community based Agritourism (Study area: villages of Tonekabon township). Journal of Tourism Planning and Development11(40), 7-40. doi: 10.22080/jtpd.2022.20965.3483 [in Persian].
  30. Jamalipour, M., Shahpouri, A., & Ghorbani, M. (2015). Factors Affecting the Formation of Change in Land Use in the Mazandaran Province: A Case Study of Tonekabon. Journal of Agricultural Economics and Development29(2), 107-115. doi: 10.22067/jead2.v0i0.27902. [In Persian].
  31. Jihad-e-Agriculture Organization of Mazandaran Province. (2022). Department of Statistics and Information. [in Persian].
  32. Kamanroodi Kojouri, M., & Gholinia, S. (2019). Sprawl of Babol city and structural-functional changes of the surrounding villages-Case study: Siakalamahaleh Village. Urban Structure and Function Studies6(19), 47-72. doi: 10.22080/shahr.2019.15550.1697 [in Persian].
  33. Kanto, S., Wisadirana, D., Chawa, A. F., & Umanailo, M. C. B. (2020). Change in community work patterns. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management (pp. 2496-502).
  34. Kazemi Chamsourak, Z., Jalalian, H., & Zanganeh, A. (2020). Analysis of functional - structural changes in transitional villages of Aivan County. Physical Social Planning, 6(4), 27-41. doi: 10.30473/psp.2020.6586. [In Persian].
  35. Korsgaard, S., Müller, S., & Tanvig, H. W. (2015). Rural entrepreneurship or entrepreneurship in the rural–between place and space. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 21(1), 5-26. doi: 10.1108/ijebr-11-2013-0205 
  36. Li, Y., Westlund, H., & Liu, Y. (2019). Why some rural areas decline while some others not: An overview of rural evolution in the world. Journal of Rural Studies, 68, 135-143. doi: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2019.03.003 
  37. Liu, Y., Dai, L., Long, H., Woods, M., & Fois, F. (2022). Rural vitalisation promoted by industrial transformation under globalization: The case of Tengtou village in China. Journal of Rural Studies, 95, 241-255. doi: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2022.09.020
  38. Momeni, H. & Joolaee, S. (2023). Structural-Functional Recognition of Holiday Villages in the Kurdan Region. Space Economy and Rural Development, 12(46), 85-98. doi: 10.61186/serd.12.46.85 [in Persian].
  39. Nasire Zare, S. & Riahi, V. (2022). Analysis of the relationship between functional changes and rural values in suburban areas (Case study: Villages of Lavasanat district in the north of Tehran). Economic Geography Research3(8), 1-18. doi: 20.1001.1.27173747.1401.3.8.1.8 [in Persian].
  40. Nourani, M., Amar, T., & Ghoreshi Minabad, M. B. (2022). Analysis of Economic-Production and Industrial Functional Changes in Peri-Urban Villages of Langrood. Regional Planning11(44), 253-268. doi: 10.30495/jzpm.2022.4067 [in Persian].
  41. Oliaee, M.Sadegh. & Azizi, S. (2019). Factors Affecting the Evolution of Economic Functions in Rural Settlements in Ray County. Space Economy and Rural Development, 8(27), 223-238. [in Persian].
  42. Riahi, V., Karaminasab, S. & Bayat, M. (2018). Factors affecting structural - functional changes in rural settlements (case study: Kurdian district - city of Jahrom). Rural Development Strategies5(2), 173-196. doi: 10.22048/rdsj.2018.80666.1642 [in Persian].
  43. Ringle, C. M., Hair, J., Hult, G. T. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2016). A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). United States: SAGE Publications
  44. Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., & Hair, J. F. (2021). Partial least squares structural equation modeling. In Handbook of market research (pp. 587-632). Cham: Springer International Publishing
  45. Sedighi, S. (2016). Explaining Factors Intensifying Land Use Changes (Case Study: Mahmoudabad County). Master's Thesis in Geography and Rural Planning, Sustainable Rural Development Management Orientation, Faculty of Geography, University of Tehran. [in Persian].
  46. Shucksmith, M., & Brown, D. L. (Eds.). (2016). Routledge International Handbook of Rural Studies, 442–454. doi: 10.4324/9781315753041-50
  47. Sikorski, D., Latocha, A., Szmytkie, R., Kajdanek, K., Miodońska, P., & Tomczak, P. (2020). Functional changes in peripheral mountainous areas in east central Europe between 2004 and 2016 as an aspect of rural revival? Kłodzko County case study. Applied Geography, 122, 102223. doi: 10.1016/j.apgeog.2020.102223
  48. Statistical Center of Iran. (2016). Detailed Results of the General Population and Housing Census. Plan and Budget Organization of Iran. [in Persian].
  49. Steiner, A., & Fan, S. (2019). Rural revitalization: Tapping into new opportunities. International Food Policy Research Institute. doi: 10.2499/9780896293502_02
  50. United nation. (2024). Available at; https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/report/2019/Goal-01/#:~:text=About%2079%20per%20cent%20of,under%2014%20years%20of%20age.
  51. World bank. (2024). Available at; https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.RUR.TOTL.ZS?locations=IR
  52. Zhao, J., & Li, T. (2021). Social Capital, Financial Literacy, and Rural Household Entrepreneurship: A Mediating Effect Analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 12. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.724605