پیامدهای روانی کووید 19بر زنان روستایی: درس‌هایی از همه‌گیری COVID-19 در زمینه سلامت روان زنان روستایی سرپرست خانوار شهرستان کنگاور

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 گروه ترویج و آموزش کشاورزی، دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشگاه رازی، کرمانشاه، ایران

2 گروه ترویج و آموزش کشاورزی، دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشگاه تربیت مدرس، تهران، ایران

10.22059/jrur.2025.385086.1998

چکیده

همه‌گیری ویروس کرونا اثرات روانی زیادی بر سلامت روان قشرهای آسیب‌پذیر از جمله زنان سرپرست خانوارهای روستایی گذاشته است. لذا مطالعه حاضر با هدف شناسایی پیامدهای روانی اپیدمی کووید-19 بر این قشر آسیب‌پذیر روستایی و ارائه درس‌هایی از همه‌گیری این ویروس انجام‌شده است. مطالعه حاضر با رویکرد کیفی و به شیوه فنومنولوژی (پدیدارشناسی) انجام‌شده است و گروه نمونه متشکل از 24 زن سرپرست خانوار است که به روش هدفمند انتخاب شدند. اطلاعات این گروه با استفاده از مصاحبه نیمه ساختاریافته جمع‌آوری شد. جهت اعتبار پذیری داده‌ها نیز از روش مثلث سازی استفاده شد. سپس داده‌ها با روش کلایزی مورد تجزیه‌وتحلیل قرار گرفت. تجزیه‌وتحلیل داده‌ها منجر به شناسایی 27 مضمون اولیه و 8 مضمون فرعی از پیامدها شد که 7 پیامد اصلی شامل؛ پیدایش مشکلات روحی و روانی، کاهش کیفیت زندگی کاری و بی‌ثباتی شغلی، امیدواری، خوش‌بینی و تاب‌آوری، خود کارآمدی و ترس از آینده را در تجربیات مشارکت‌کنندگان نشان داد. همه‌گیری کووید-19 دوران چالش‌برانگیزی بود که پیامدهای آن تابه‌حال دامن‌گیر مردم بوده است . بر این اساس می‌توان گفت، رویکردها و مداخلات بهداشت عمومی از سوی سازمان‌ها و ارگان‌های مرتبط باید با اولویت حمایت از اقشار آسیب‌پذیر جامعه از جمله زنان سرپرست خانوار باشد و سیاست‌ها نیز بایستی پاسخگوی نابرابری‌های جنسیتی و اجتماعی باشند تا زمینه کاهش اثرات منفی همه‌گیری‌های جهانی را چه در طول و چه پس از همه‌گیری فراهم آورد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

Psychological consequences of covid-19 on rural women: lessons from the covid-19 epidemic in the field of mental health of rural women head of households in Kangavar county

نویسندگان [English]

  • Bahman Mahdavi 1
  • farahnaz rostami ghobadi 1
  • شهپر گراوندی 1
  • somayeh moradhaseli 2
1 Department of Agricultural Extension and Education, Faculty of Agriculture, Razi University, Kermanshah, Iran
2 Department of Agricultural Extension and Education, Faculty of Agriculture, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran.
چکیده [English]

A B S T R A C T
The coronavirus pandemic has had a significant impact on the mental health of vulnerable groups, including women heads of rural households. Therefore, the present study aimed to identify the psychological consequences of the Covid-19 epidemic on this vulnerable rural group and to provide lessons from the pandemic. The present study was conducted with a qualitative approach and a phenomenological approach, and the sample group consisted of 24 women heads of households who were selected purposively. Information from this group was collected using semi-structured interviews. The triangulation method was also used to validate the data. Then, the data were analyzed using the Claise method. Data analysis led to the identification of 27 primary themes and 8 sub-themes of the outcomes, which showed 7 main outcomes including; the emergence of mental and psychological problems, reduced quality of work life and job instability, hope, optimism and resilience, self-efficacy, and fear of the future in the experiences of the participants. The COVID-19 pandemic was a challenging time, the consequences of which have affected people to this day. Accordingly, it can be said that public health approaches and interventions by relevant organizations and bodies should prioritize supporting vulnerable segments of society, including female heads of households, and policies should also be responsive to gender and social equality to provide the basis for reducing the negative effects of global pandemics, both during and after the pandemic.
Extended Abstract
Introduction
Considering the epidemic situation of the Covid-19 virus, the consequences of the spread of this disease, which has affected all aspects of human life and continues. Because the mental health consequences of the pandemic are gendered, and women have been more severely affected by harmful domestic violence and financial harm during COVID-19 than men, scoring more severely on mental health measures. In addition to the effects it had on people's physical health, the corona virus epidemic has left many psychological effects on people's mental health. Among the people exposed to consequences related to the mental health of women heads of rural households. Therefore, the present study was conducted with the aim of identifying the psychological consequences and lessons from the epidemic of this virus.
 
Methodology
The present study was conducted with a qualitative approach and phenomenological method, and the sample group consists of 24 female heads of the household, who were selected in a targeted way. The information of this group was collected using a semi-structured interview and was analyzed using the Colaizzi’s method. This method consists of seven steps: 1- In this step, all the descriptions and experiences of the studied society were studied several times in order to empathize with them. Making meanings and trying to reach the specific meaning and concept of each sentence, 4-‌ Clustering each of the formulated meanings and concepts, 5-‌ Combining the results in the form of a comprehensive description of the subject. research case, 6- Formulating a comprehensive description of the subject under study in the form of a real and necessary description, 7- Validating the findings by referring back to the people under study to confirm the findings. In this study, various and clear questions were asked from the subjects from different angles for credibility, and the triangulation method was used in the data analysis stage. In order to be transferable, the strategy of different sources of data collection and analysis was used. In order to verify the findings and ensure the accuracy of the results obtained with the help of the research group, the concepts extracted from the content analysis, reports, manuscripts and research notes were again provided to the research group and finally the research group in the field of how to collect data and how The interpretation and analysis were agreed upon and the necessary feedback from the studied samples of the research in the context of the obtained results shows the reliability of this study.
 
Results and discussion
Data analysis led to the identification of 27 primary themes and 8 sub-themes of outcomes, which included 7 main outcomes. The results obtained from identifying the psychological consequences of this disease on the mental health of female heads of households in the studied village showed that mental and emotional problems, reduced quality of work life and job instability, hope, optimism and resilience, self-efficacy and fear of the future are negative and positive consequences in It has been a study community. Therefore, it is necessary to compile lessons in this field in the health system, taking into account all the above cases, with comprehensive pathology in these conditions. In this regard, based on the results obtained from the results and the breakdown and analysis of all the mentioned dimensions and components of these results, comprehensive lessons for the management of these results on the mental health of women heads of rural households for the post-corona sensitive period and even in the event of the emergence of The same is presented in the future.
 
Conclusion
The covid-19 epidemic was a challenging time, the consequences of which are still affecting people. Therefore, it is necessary to compile lessons from this epidemic and make greater progress in psychological science in the field of women's mental health.
Lesson 1: Individual and family factors should be the center of attention and consider it as a main factor in planning.
Lesson 2: Psychological interventions based on awareness of mind and thought should appear when these situations arise.
Lesson 3: When fighting diseases, we must think globally.
Lesson 4: We need to improve health literacy and educational information.
Lesson 5: The influence of executive factors should be used in the analysis of public health to address psychosocial problems.
In accordance with the presented lessons necessary to control or manage the psychological consequences on the mental health of women heads of rural households in the post-corona era, things like: creating an organized and coherent system to organize this group of women with mental problems, as a result of this Illness is considered necessary by executive agents in order to familiarize rural women with various types of psychological disorders by including lessons during the virus epidemic in order to cope and turn challenges into opportunities in the post-corona era.
 
Funding
There is no funding support.
 
Authors’ Contribution
Authors contributed equally to the conceptualization and writing of the article. All of the authors approved thecontent of the manuscript and agreed on all aspects of the work declaration of competing interest none.
 
Conflict of Interest
Authors declared no conflict of interest.
 
Acknowledgments
 We are grateful to all the scientific consultants of this paper.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Covid-19
  • Mental Health of Female Heads of Rural Households
  • Psychological Consequences
  • Lessons From The Epidemic

مراجع

  1. علیزاده بیرجندی، زهرا؛ غنچه ای، محدثه؛ حکم آبادی، فاطمه و موسویان، سیده زهرا. (1399). بررسی رابطه بین اضطراب ناشی از کرونا و پیامدهای آن بر سلامت روان کارکنان. سنجش و پژوهش در مشاوره و روانشناسی، 2 (4)، 32-21. doi: 10.22059/IJAEDR.2015.55517
  2. عسگری، محمد؛ چوبداری، عسگر و برجعلی، احمد . (1400). تحلیل مضامین ابعاد سلامت روان متأثر از همه‌گیری ویروس کرونا: پژوهشی کیفی. روان شناسی بالینی 13 (2)، 110-97.  Doi:10.22075/jcp.2020.21008.1928
  3. جمشیدی، معصومه و جمشیدی، علیرضا . (1401). جهان جدید: تجربه زیسته فعالان بخش کشاورزی از بحرآن‌همه‌گیری کووید 19 (موردمطالعه: شهرستان چرداول - استان ایلام). پژوهش‌های روستائی، 13 (4)، 597-576. doi: 10.22059/jrur.2022.344215.1749
  4. شهیاد، شیما و محمدی، محمدتقی. (1401). آثار روان‌شناختی گسترش بیماری کووید-19 بر وضیعت سلامت روان افراد جامعه: مطالعه مروری. طب نظامی، 2 (22)، 184-192. doi: 10.30491/JMM.22.2.184
  5. شمس الدینی، علی و امیری فهلیانی، محمد رضا. (1401). تحلیل عدم قطعیت‌های آینده تاب‌آوری اجتماعی جوامع روستایی با کاوش در واقعیت‌های موجود در چهارچوب برنامه‌ریزی سناریو (موردمطالعه : روستای فهلیان شهرستان ممسنی).  پژوهش‌های روستایی، 13 (4)، 598- 617. doi: 10.22059/jrur.2022.340735.1729
  6. Alizadeh Birjandi, Z., Ghonchei, M., Hokambadi, F., & Moussavian, S.Z. (2020). Investigating the relationship between anxiety caused by Corona and its consequences on the mental health of employees. Assessment and Research in Counseling and Psychology, 2(4), 21-32. doi: 10.22059/IJAEDR.2015.55517 [In persian].
  7. Arora, T., & Grey, I. (2020). Health behavior changes during COVID-19 and the potential consequences: A mini-review. J. Health Psychol, 25, 1155–1163. doi: 10.1177/1359105320937053
  8. Asgari, M., Choobdari, A., & Borjali, A. (2021). Content analysis of mental health dimensions affected by the coronavirus pandemic: a qualitative study. Clinical Psychology, 13(2), 97-109 doi: 10.22075/jcp.2020.21008.1928. [In persian].
  9. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Rural & Remote Health; Cat No. PHE 255. 2020. Available online: https://www.aihw. gov.au/reports/phe/193/rural-remote-health/contents/access-to-health-care (accessed on 27 February 2020).
  10. Bauer, L.L., Seiffer, B., Deinhart, C., Atrott, B., Sudeck, G., & Hautzinger. M. (2020). Associations of exercise and social support with mental health during quarantine and social-distancing measures during the COVID-19 pandemic: A cross-sectional survey in Germany. MedRxiv, 1-18. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2022.114559
  11. Brooks, S. K., Webster, R. K., Smith, L.E., Woodland, L., Wessely, S., Greenberg, N., & Rubin, G. J. (2020). The Psychological Impact of Quarantine and How to Reduce It: Rapid Review of the Evidence. Lancet, 395(10227): 912-920. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30460-8
  12. Cacioppo, J. T., & Cacioppo, S. (2018). Loneliness in the modern age: An Evolutionary Theory of Loneliness (ETL). In J. M. Olson (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 58) (pp. 127–197). Academic Press. doi.org/10.1016/bs.aesp.2018.03.003.
  13. Cacioppo, J. T., & Hawkley, L. C. (2009). Perceived social isolation and cognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 13(10), 447–454. doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2009.06.005.
  14. Darnhofer, I. (2020). Farm resilience in the face of the unexpected: lessons the COVID-19 pandemic. Agric Human Values, 37(3), 605–606. doi:10.1007/ s10460-020-10053-5. 
  15. Duan, H., Yan, L., Ding, X., Gan, Y., Kohn, N., & Wu, J. (2020). Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on mental health in the general Chinese population: Changes, predictors and psychosocial correlates. Psychiatry Research, 293, 1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2020.113396
  16. Ellis, G.D., Jiang, J., Freeman, P.A., Lacanienta, A., & Jamal, T. (2021). Leisure as immediate conscious experience: Foundations, evaluation, and extension of the theory of structured experiences. J. Leis. Res, 51, 581–600. doi:10.1080/00222216.2020.1754735
  17. Findlay, L.C., Arim, R., & Kohen, D. (2020). Understanding the Perceived Mental Health of Canadians during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Health Rep, 31, 22–27. doi:10.1139/facets-2021-0078
  18. Fisher, J.R., Tran, T.D., Hammargerg, K., Sastry, J., Nguyen, H., Rowe, H., Popplestone, S., Stocker, R., Stubber, C., & Kirkman, M. (2020). Mental health of people in Australia in the first month of COVID-19 restrictions: A national survey. Med. J. Aust, 213, 458–464. doi:: 10.5694/mja2.50831.
  19. Guba,  L. (1994). Competing Paradigms in Qualitative Research Handbook of Qualitative Research - Free download as Word Doc.
  20. Hiscott, J., Alexandridi, M., Muscolini, M., Tassone, E., Palermo, E., Soultsioti, M., & Zevini, A. (2020). The Global Impact of the Coronavirus Pandemic. Cytokine & Growth Factor Reviews, 53, 1- 9. DOI: 10.1016/j.cytogfr.2020.05.010
  21. Hossain, M.M., Sultana, A., & Purohit, N. (2020). Mental health outcomes of quarantine and isolation for infection prevention: a systematic umbrella review of the global evidence. Epidemiology Health, 42, e2020038. DOI: 10.4178/epih.e2020038
  22. Jafari, N., Araghieh, A., Oshare, A., Dawaii, M., & Moghaddisi, H. (2022). Mental health of elementary school students in the Corona pandemic; the key role of health literacy. Research in curriculum planning. Knowledge and research in educational sciences-curriculum planning, 19(45), 152-165. doi. org/ 10.30486/JSRE.2022.1940261.1985.
  23. Jamshidi, M., & Jamshidi, A. (2023). The New World: Lived Experience of Agricultural Workers about the Covid-19 Pandemic Crisis (Case Study: Chardavol Township). Journal of Rural Research, 13(4), 576-597, doi: 10.22059/jrur.2022.344215.1749. [In Persian].
  24. Jenkins, E.K., McAuliffe, C., Hirani, S., Richardson, C., Thomson, K.C., McGuinness, L., Morris, J., Kousoulis, A., & Gadermann, A. (2021), A portrait of the early and differential mental health impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic in Canada: Findings from the first wave of a nationally representative cross-sectional survey. Prev. Med, 145, 106333. DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2020.106333
  25. Kangavar County Welfare Department Statistics. 2022.
  26. Li, H., Lv, L., Zuo, J., Bartsch, K., Wang, L., & Xia, Q. (2020). Determinants of public satisfaction with an Urban Water environment treatment PPP project in Xuchang, China. Sustain. Cities Soc, 60, 102244. DOI:10.1016/j.scs.2020.102244
  27. Liu, N., Zhang, F., Wei, C., Jia, Y., Shang, Z., Sun, L., Wu, L., Sun, Z., Zhou, Y., Wang, Y. (2020). Prevalence and predictors of PTSS during COVID-19 outbreak in China hardest-hit areas: Gender differences matter. Psychiatry Res, 287, 112921. DOI: 10.1016/j.psychres.2020.112921
  28. Lokot, M., & Avakyan, Y. (2020). Intersectionality as a lens to the COVID-19 pandemic: Implications for sexual and reproductive health in development and humanitarian contexts. Sex. Reprod. Health Matters, 28, 1764748. DOI: 10.1080/26410397.2020.1764748
  29. Marroquín, B., Vine, V., & Morgan, R. (2020). Mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic: Effects of stay-at-home policies, social distancing behavior, and social resources. Psychiatry Res, 293, 113419. DOI: 10.1016/j.psychres.2020.113419
  30. Mazza, C., Ricci, E., Biondi, S., Colasanti, M., Ferracuti, S., Napoli, C., & Roma, P. A. (2020). Nationwide Survey of Psychological Distress among Italian People during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Immediate Psychological Responses and Associated Factors. Int. J. Env. Res. Public Health, 17, 3165. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17093165
  31. Meredith, D., McNamara, J., van Doorn, D., & Richardson, N. (2020). Essential and vulnerable: implications of Covid-19 for farmers in Ireland. J Agromedicine, 25(4), 357–61. doi: 10. 1080/ 10599 24X. 18149 20.
  32. Meuwissen, M., Feindt, P., Slijper, T., Spiegel, A., Finger, R., deMey, Y., Paas, W., Termeer, K., Poortvliet, P., & Peneva, M. (2021). Impact of COVID-19 on farming systems in Europe through the lens of resilience thinking. Agric. Syst, 191, 103152. DOI: 10.1016/j.agsy.2021.103152
  33. Morrow, R., Rodriguez, A., & King, N. (2015). Colaizzi’s descriptive phenomenological method. Psychologist, 28 (8), 643–644.
  34. National Divisions Database, Official website of the Ministry of Interior of Iran. 2021.
  35. Park, C.L., Russell, B.S., Fendrich, M., Finkelstein-Fox, L., Hutchison, M., & Becker, J. (2020). Americans’ COVID-19 Stress, Coping, and Adherence to CDC Guidelines. J. Gen. Intern. Med, 35, 2296–2303. DOI: 10.1007/s11606-020-05898-9
  36. Pierce, M., Hope, H., Ford, T., Hatch, S., Hotopf, M., John, A., Kontopantelis, E., Webb, R., Wessely, S., & McManus, S. (2020). Mental health before and during the COVID-19 pandemic: A longitudinal probability sample survey of the UK population. Lancet Psychiatry, 7, 883–892. DOI: 10.1007/s11606-020-05898-9
  37. Qiu, J., Shen, B., Zhao, M., Wang, Z., Xie, B., & Xu, Y. A. (2020). nationwide survey of psychological distress among Chinese people in the COVID-19 epidemic: implications and policy recommendations. General psychiatry, 33(2): 1-3. DOI: 10.1136/gpsych-2020-100213
  38. Rajkumar, R. P. (2020). COVID-19 and mental health: A review of the existing literature. Asian journal of Psychiatry, 52, 102066. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajp.2020.102066
  39. Rose, D. C., Shortland, F., Hall, J., Hurley, P., Little, R., Nye, C., & Lobley, M. (2022). The Impact of COVID-19 on Farmers' Mental Health: A Case Study of the UK. Journal of agromedicine, 1–19. doi.org/10.1080/1059924X.2022.2137616
  40. Sameer, A. S., Khan, M. A., Nissar, S., & Banday, M. Z. (2020). Assessment of Mental Health and Various Coping Strategies among general population living Under Imposed COVID-Lockdown Across world: A Cross-Sectional Study. Ethics, Medicine and Public Health, 15, 100571. DOI: 10.1016/j.jemep.2020.100571
  41. Santomauro, D.F., Mantilla Herrera, A.M., Shadid, J., Zheng, P., Ashbaugh, C., Pigott, D.M., Abbafati, C., Adolph, C.; Amlag, J.O., & Aravkin, A.Y. (2021). Global prevalence and burden depressive and anxiety disorders in 204 countries and territories in 2020 due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Lancet, 398, 1700–1712.DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)02143-7
  42. Sapbamrer, R., Chittrakul, J., Sirikul, W., Kitro, A., Chaiut, W., & Panya, P. (2022). Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on daily lives, agricultural working lives, and mental health of farmers in northern Thailand. Sustainability, 14(3),1189. doi.org/10.3390/su14031189
  43. Shahyad, Sh., & Mohammadi, M.T. (2020). Psychological effects of the spread of COVID-19 on the mental health status of individuals in the community: A review study. Journal of Military Medicine, 22(2), 184-192. doi: 10.30491/JMM.22.2.184.[In Persian].
  44. Shakespeare-Finch, J., Bowen-Salter, H., Cashin, M., Badawi, A., Wells, R., Rosenbaum, S., & Steel, Z. (2020). COVID-19: An Australian Perspective. J. Loss Trauma, 25, 662–672. DOI: 10.1080/15325024.2020.1780748
  45. Shams Al-Dini, A., & Amiri Fahliani, M. R. (2023). Analyzing the Future Uncertainties of Social Resilience of Rural Communities by Exploring the Existing Realities in the Framework of Scenario Planning (Case Study: Fahlian Village). Journal of Rural Research, 13(4), 598-617. DOI:10.22059/jrur.2022.340735.1729. [In Persian]
  46. Smith, L., Jacob, L., Yakkundi, A., McDermott, D., Armstrong, N.C., Barnett, Y., López-Sánchez, G.F., Martin, S., Butler, L., & Tully, M.A. (2020). Correlates of symptoms of anxiety and depression and mental wellbeing associated with COVID-19: A cross-sectional study of UK-based respondents. Psychiatry Res, 291, 113138.DOI: 10.1016/j.psychres.2020.113138.
  47. Stanton, R., To, Q.G., Khalesi, S., Williams, S.L., Alley, S.J., Thwaite, T.L., Fenning, A.S., & Vandelanotte, C. (2020). Depression, Anxiety and Stress during COVID-19: Associations with Changes in Physical Activity, Sleep, Tobacco and Alcohol Use in Australian Adults. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 17, 4065.DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17114065
  48. United Nations. Policy Brief: The Impact of COVID-19 on Women; United Nations: New York, NY, USA, 2020.
  49. Verhoeven, A.A., Adriaanse, M.A., de Vet, E., Fennis, B.M., & de Ridder, D.T. (2015). It’s my party and I eat if I want to. Reasons for unhealthy snacking. Appetite, 84, 20–27.  DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2014.09.013
  50. Vindegaard, N., & Benros, M. E. (2020). COVID-19 pandemic and mental health consequences: systematic review of the current evidence. Brain, Behavior, and Immunity, 89, 531-542. DOI: 10.1016/j.bbi.2020.05.048
  51. Wood, L.J., Boruff, B.J., & Smith, H.M. (2013). When Disaster Strikes . . . How communities cope and adapt: A social capital perspective. In Social Capital: Theory, Measurement and Outcomes. Nova Science Publishers, Inc.: New York, NY, USA.
  52. Xiao, J., Zhao, J., Luo, Z., & Liu, F. (2022). Greenwood, D. The impact of built environment on mental health: A COVID-19 lockdown perspective. Health Place, 77, 102889. DOI:10.1016/j.healthplace.2022.102889
  53. Yazd, S.D., Wheeler, S.A., & Zuo, A. (2019). Key risk factors affecting farmers’ mental health: a systematic review. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 16(23), 4849. doi:10.3390/ijerph16234849.  
  54. Ziersch, A.M., Baum, F., Darmawan, I.G., Kavanagh, A.M., & Bentley, R.J. (2023). Social capital and health in rural and urban communities in South Australia. Aust. N. Z. J. Public Health, 33, 7–16. DOI: 10.1111/j.1753-6405.2009.00332.x
پژوهش های روستائی
دوره 16، شماره 1
اردیبهشت 1404
صفحه 115-131

فایل ها

سابقه مقاله

  • تاریخ دریافت: 06 آذر 1403
  • تاریخ بازنگری: 15 اسفند 1403
  • تاریخ پذیرش: 09 فروردین 1404

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار