پژوهش های روستائی

پژوهش های روستائی

ادراک اثرات بحران آب بر فقر روستایی مطالعه موردی: روستای ماخونیک، استان خراسان جنوبی

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان
1 گروه جغرافیا، دانشکده ادبیات و علوم انسانی، دانشگاه لرستان، نام شهر خرم‌آباد، ایران
2 گروه جغرافیا، دانشکده ادبیات و علوم انسانی، دانشگاه بیرجند، بیرجند، ایران
3 گروه جغرافیای انسانی، دانشکده علوم جغرافیایی، دانشگاه خوارزمی، تهران، ایران
چکیده
متأثر از موقعیت جغرافیایی و قرار گرفتن در اقلیم گرم و خشک ناحیه شرقی ایران، یکی از مهم‌ترین چالش­های توسعه روستایی این مناطق مسئله کمبود آب است. آب به‌عنوان حیاتی­ترین عامل محیطی و معیشتی و یکی از اصلی­ترین ابزارهای توسعه اقتصادی در نواحی روستایی محسوب می­گردد، که کمبود آن مسیر توسعه­یافتگی این نواحی را سخت­تر و پیچیده­تر می­سازد. بدین­سان، این مقاله با بهره­گیری از پارادایم کیفی و تئوری زمینه­ای به بررسی اثرات بحران آب در فقر روستای ماخونیک (یکی از هفت روستای شگفت­انگیز جهان) پرداخت. جامعه آماری شامل دودسته مطلعان کلیدی روستایی بودند که به روش نمونه­گیری هدفمند، 22 نفر با روش گلوله برفی انتخاب و با استفاده از مصاحبه­های عمیق و نیمه­ساختارمند و رسیدن به اشباع نظری داده­ها جمع­آوری گردید. برای تحلیل روایت­ها از روش کدگذاری سه مرحله­ای باز، محوری و انتخابی استفاده گردید. یافته­ها نشان داد، بسط و گسترش کمبود آب در یک بستر جغرافیایی (روستا) بسان یک عامل مهم می­تواند منجر به محدودیت­های مادی و اجتماعی، محدود شدن آگاهی و انحراف عقاید و سنت­ها و نهایتاً بدی اوضاع و توقف جریان­های مثبت اقتصادی فقرا گردد. همچنین نتایج نشان داد به ترتیب مقوله­های ردپای بحران آب در فقر بنیان­های محیطی، فقر فرهنگ روستایی، فقر روابط اجتماعی، فقر نظام اقتصادی و بهره­وری روستایی، فقر نهادی و مدیریتی، فقر امنیت غذایی، فقر نظام ارتباطی روستا و ردپای بحران آب در فقر بافت روستایی با اهمیت بوده­اند و مقوله هسته "نظام فضایی حاکم بر منطقه (ردپای بحران آب در چشم­انداز فقر فرهنگی و محیطی روستا)" شناخته شد.
کلیدواژه‌ها
موضوعات

عنوان مقاله English

Understanding the Influence of Water Crisis on their Rural Poverty: A case study of Makhoonik Village, South Khorasan Province

نویسندگان English

Horieh Moradi 1
Morteza Esmailnejad 2
Hassan Afrakhteh 3
1 Department of Geography, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, Lorestan University, Khorramabad, Iran
2 Department of Geography, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, University of Birjand, Birjand, Iran
3 Department of Human Geography, Faculty of Geographical Sciences, Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran
چکیده English

A B S T R A C T
Affected by the geographical location and being in the hot and dry climate of the eastern region of Iran, one of the most important challenges for these regions' rural development is the water shortage problem. Water is considered the most vital environmental and livelihood factor and one of the main economic development tools in rural areas. This article investigated the effects of the water crisis on the poverty of Makhoonik village (one of the seven wonderful villages of the world) by using the qualitative paradigm and grounded theory. The statistical population consisted of two groups of rural key informants, 22 people were selected using the snowball method and using semi-structured interviews and reaching the theoretical saturation of the data. The three-step open, central, and selective coding method was used to analyze the narratives. The findings showed that the lack of water in a village is an important factor that can lead to social restrictions, awareness, and deviation of opinions and traditions and stop the positive economic flows of people experiencing poverty. Also, the categories of water crisis trace poverty of environmental foundations, poverty of rural culture, poverty of social relations, poverty of economic system and rural productivity, institutional and managerial poverty, poverty of food security, poverty of village communication system, and traces of water crisis in poverty. The rural context has been important, and the most important category is "the spatial system governing the region (the traces of the water crisis in the landscape of cultural and environmental poverty of the village)".
Extended Abstract
Introduction
In recent years, some areas of Iran have faced a serious water crisis, and the government, as a manager of water resources, has faced challenges. The water crisis also disrupts environmental, social, and economic functions, causes a gradual lack of food security and a decrease in people's satisfaction level; water restrictions and increased demand lead to water shortages and increased tension at regional and international levels, and within the country, between provinces for the system Water transfer creates conflicts. In the meantime, water restrictions are clearly evident in the villages of eastern Iran. Since the main tool of development in desert areas is water, South Khorasan province, as the second desert province and the easternmost province of Iran, has a special place in the production of horticultural and agricultural products of the country and has a high potential in the mining sector, to the title of the study area was selected. Among this province, Makhoonik village is one of the seven wonderful villages of the world in Sarbisheh city, which has been most damaged by the water crisis in the rural development sector, so the effects of the water crisis are clearly evident in the various dimensions of rural poverty. Therefore, this research aims to answer this basic question:
-What is the semantic understanding of the effects of the water crisis on rural poverty in Makhoonik? In other words, according to the native community and experts, what are the causal, contextual, and intervening categories and concepts that affect the effects of the water crisis in Makhoonik rural poverty?

Methodology
With the aim of using the qualitative paradigm, the present article studied the semantic understanding of the effects of the water crisis on the poverty of Makhoonik village (one of the seven wonderful villages in the world). In terms of developmental-applicative goal, paradigm in the qualitative research group, and method, it has benefited from the basic theory (contextual theory), which is based on the inductive approach. The statistical population included two categories of rural key informants (village residents and some experts and planners of rural development in Iran); 22 people were selected using the snowball method and using in-depth and semi-structured interviews. Structured and finally reaching theoretical saturation, the data was collected. To analyze the narratives, a three-stage open, central, and selective coding method was used, and then the basic theory was drawn based on the paradigmatic model of the semantic understanding of the effects of water in the poverty of Makhoonik village.

Results and discussion
The findings showed that in the rural poverty of the study area, the categories of traces of water crisis in the poverty of environmental foundations, poverty of rural culture, poverty of social relations, poverty of the economic system and rural productivity, institutional and management poverty, security poverty, respectively. Food, the poverty of the village communication system, and the trace of the water crisis in the poverty of the rural context have been necessary, and the most important category (the core category) was "the spatial system governing the region (the trace of the water crisis in the perspective of cultural and environmental poverty of the village)." The findings of the background study on the semantic understanding of the effects of the water crisis in rural poverty clearly show that the expansion of water shortage in a geographical context (village) is an important factor that can lead to material and social limitations; the limitation of awareness and the deviation of beliefs and traditions and finally the bad economic situation of people experiencing poverty. This process showed under what conditions/substrates, interactions/strategies the impact of the water crisis in rural poverty worked, and also the role of spatial elements of the water crisis in rural poverty was depicted from the point of view of experts and key informants of the research of that region. The consequences that the water crisis caused in these areas are numerous; they mainly included the following:
The traces of the water crisis in the poverty of environmental foundations, the traces of the water crisis in the poverty of rural culture, the traces of the water crisis in the poverty of social relations, traces of the water crisis in the poverty of the economic system and rural productivity, traces of the water crisis in institutional and managerial poverty, traces of the water crisis in the poverty of food security, traces of the water crisis in the poverty of the village communication system, traces of the water crisis in the poverty of the rural context.

Conclusion
In order to get out of the poverty trap created in Makhoonik village, it is suggested that the development programs presented to this village, along with a sense of respect for the people's culture, people's participation through education, and the creation of civil institutions consisting of villagers interested in technology and Today's innovations, be given attention and scientific action from the government and private sector.
- Proper access to infrastructural capital such as telecommunication antennas, the internet, and accommodation opportunities for tourists entering this village, in other words, the possibility of communication and interaction between the residents of this village with the world outside the village environment in it, is necessary for positive cultural changes.
- It is suggested that special attention be paid to the continuous presence of rural reformers from a non-touristic point of view. For this purpose and in the direction of implementing "practical rural development," it is suggested that the development and expansion of civil associations of the local community should be given special attention to slowly lead to the participation of the majority of the villagers through influence in the culture and brought about positive changes in the villagers in accordance with the current century.

Funding
There is no funding support.
Authors’ Contribution
Authors contributed equally to the conceptualization and writing of the article.

Conflict of Interest
Authors declared no conflict of interest.

Acknowledgments
This article is taken from the intra-university research project of Lorestan University.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Grounded Theory
Rural Poverty
Water Crisis
Environmental Foundations
Makhoonik Village
  1. آستانی، سجاد. (1389). بررسی نوع نگرش سنتی و تنوع فرهنگی در یکی از شگفت­انگیزترین مناطق روستایی(مطالعه موردی روستای ماخونیک، روستای لی لی پوت­های ایران). کنفرانس ملی حفاظت از تنوع زیستی و دانش بومی، 10 اسفند 1389، مرکز بین­المللی علوم و تکنولوژی پیشرفته و علوم محیطی. کرمان. صص 8-1.  
  2. ادیب­حاج­باقری، محسن؛ پرویزی، سرور و صلصالی، مهوش. (1389). روش­های تحقیق کیفی. چاپ دوم. تهران: انتشارات بشری.
  3. پاپ­زن، عبدالحمید؛ قبادی، پرویز؛ زرافشانی، کیومرث و گراوندی، شهپر. (1389). مشکلات و محدودیت­های گردشگری روستایی با استفاده از نظریه بنیانی (مورد: روستای حریر استان کرمانشاه). پژوهش­های روستایی، 1 (3)، 51- 26.
  4. پازکی، معصومه و یوردخانی، مختار. (1393). واکاوی و بررسی عوامل مؤثر بر توسعه گردشگری سبز روستایی توچال (بر اساس روش تئوری بنیادین). نگرش­های نو در جغرافیای انسانی، 7 (1)، 248ـ 237.  20.1001.1.66972251.1393.7.1.15.8
  5. پاپلی­یزدی، محمدحسین؛ جمعه­پور، محمود و مهدی­زاده زاکانی، محمد. (1396). بررسی پیامدهای اجتماعی بحران کمبود منابع آب در مناطق کویری (مطالعه موردی: شهرستان اردکان). علوم اجتماعی، 26 (77)، 99-136. doi.org/10.22054/qjss.2017.7922
  6. پیران، پرویز. (1384). پیامدها و آثار فقر و نابرابری در ایران/ فقر و جنبش­های اجتماعی در ایران. مجله رفاه اجتماعی، 5 (18)، 40-11.
  7. حاتمی، عباس و نوربخش، سوسن (1398). بازسازی معنایی بحران آب در شرق اصفهان بر اساس نظریه زمینه­ای. جامعه­شناسی کاربردی، 30 (1)، 142-123. doi: 10.22108/jas.2018.109357.1299
  8. رحیم­خانی، طاهره. (1399). بازیابی معماری شهداد کران بر پایه مطالعه باستان­شناسی معماری ماخونیک. مجله نامه انسان­شناسی، 17(30)، 128-97.  doi: 20.1001.1.17352096.1400.17.30.4.8
  9. عباس­زاده، محمد؛ بنی­فاطمه، حسین و نرمین، نیکدل. (1399). بررسی درک و تصور کشاورزان از بحران دریاچه ارومیه با رویکرد نظریه زمینه­ای، مجله جامعه شناسی کاربردی، 31 (2)، 1-23.  doi:10.22108/jas.2019.117790.1728
  10. طبیعی، منصور؛ ایمان، محمدتقی و کریمی، ماندانا. (1400). کاوش مردم‌نگارانۀ انتقادی چالش‌های بحران آب در روستاهای شهرستان ممسنی. پژوهش­های راهبردی مسائل اجتماعی ایران، 10 (2)، 22-1. Doi:10.22108/srspi.2021.126606.1657
  11. طالبی صومعه­سرایی، مهشید؛ ذکائی، محمد سعید؛ فاضلی، محمد و جمعه­پور، محمد. (1398). جامعه­شناسی یک بحران: آسیب­شناسی اجتماعی بحران آب در حوضه آبریز زاینده­رود، مجله میان رشته­ای در علوم انسانی، 11 (4)، 165-133. doi.org/10.22035/isih.2020.3652.3833
  12. فائقی، سحر و نوابخش، مهرداد. (1396). بر ساخت معنایی پیامدهای اجتماعی و فرهنگی کم­آبی و خشکسالی زاینده­رود، مجله جامعه­شناختی شهری، 22 (15) 22، 106-73.
  13. گل­محمدی، فرهود؛ کرباسچی، مهدی؛ بامری. محمدنصیر؛ هنری. یلدا؛ اصفهانی. الهام؛ مستقیم، مسعود و محمدزاده. عباس. (1392). جاذبه­های گردشگری و تغییرات اجتماعی- اقتصادی و فرهنگی روستای ماخونیک در شهرستان سربیشه استان خراسان جنوبی در دو دهه گذشته. همدان: اولین همایش مدیریت گردشگری طبیعت گردی و جغرافیا، 23 بهمن 1392، انجمن ارزیابان محیط زیست هگمتانه در دانشکده شهید مفتح همدان، صص 8-1.
  14. گیدنز، آنتونی. (1376). روش­های تحقیق جامعه­شناسی. ترجمه: منوچهر صبور. تهران: نشر نی.
  15. مرادی، خدیجه و آگهی، حسین. (1394). واکاوی چالش­های مدیریت روستایی با رویکرد کیفی تئوری بنیانی، مجله جغرافیا و توسعه، 34، 181ـ 167.
  16. میرلطفی، محمودرضا و شهرکی، سعیده. (1400). تحلیل اثرات آرمان‌گرایی روستائیان بر توسعه روستایی (مورد مطالعه: منطقه سیستان). پژوهش­های روستایی، 12 (4)، 781-768.  doi:10.22059/jrur.2021.326841.1653
  17. یزدان­پناه، مسعود و رحیمی­ فیض­آباد، فاطمه. (1398). دلایل عدم موفقیت ترویج کشاورزی با استفاده از تئوری بنیانی (مورد مطالعه: جهاد کشاورزی استان لرستان). مجله تحقیقات اقتصاد و توسعه کشاورزی ایران. 50 (3)، 549-575. doi:10.22059/ijaedr.2019.269598.668674
  18. Abbaszadeh, M., Banifatemeh, H., & Narmin, N. (2020). A study of farmers' perception of Urmia Lake (UL) crisis with grounded theory approach. Journal of Applied Sociology, 31(2), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.22108/jas.2019.117790.1728 [In Persian]
  19. Adib Haj Bagheri, M., Parvizi, S., & Salsali, M. (2009). Qualitative research methods (2nd ed.). Beshar Publications. [In Persian]
  20. Allan, J. A. (1998). Virtual water: A strategic resource global solutions to regional deficits. Ground Water, 36, 545–546. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6584.1998.tb02825.x
  21. Astani, S. (2010). Investigating the type of traditional attitude and cultural diversity in one of the most amazing rural areas (A case study of Makhonik village, Liliput village of Iran). National Conference on Protection of Biodiversity and Native Knowledge, Tehran. [In Persian]
  22. Bichsel, C. (2016). Water and the (infra-)structure of political rule: A synthesis. Water Alternatives, 9(2), 356–372.
  23. Bijani, M., & Hayati, D. (2015). Farmers' perceptions toward agricultural water conflict: The case of Doroodzan dam irrigation network, Iran. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 17(3), 561–575. https://doi.org/20.1001.1.16807073.2015.17.3.20.5
  24. Chambers, E. (2009). From authenticity to significance: Tourism on the frontier of culture and place. Futures, 41(6), 353–359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2008.11.003
  25. Cotton, W. R., Riley, E., & Dunlap, R. E. (1978). Environmental sociology: A new paradigm. The American Sociologist, 13(1), 41–49.
  26. Faeghi, S., & Navabakhsh, M. (2017). On the semantic construction of social and cultural consequences of water scarcity and drought in Zayandeh-Rood. Urban Sociology Quarterly, 22(15), 73–106. [In Persian]
  27. Forouzani, M., & Karami, E. (2011). Agricultural water poverty index and sustainability. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 31(2), 415–431. https://doi.org/10.1051/agro/2010026
  28. Giddens, A. (1997). Sociological research methods (M. Sabour, Trans.). Ni Publications. [In Persian]
  29. Gol-Mohammadi, F., Karbaschi, M., Bamry, M. N., Honari, Y., Isfahanian, E., Mostaghim, M., & Mohammadzadeh, A. (2013). Tourist attractions and socio-economic and cultural changes of Makhonik village in Sarbisheh city of South Khorasan Province in the last two decades. First Conference on Nature and Geographical Tourism Management, Hamedan. [In Persian]
  30. Hatami, A., & Noorbakhsh, S. (2019). Reconstructing the meaning of the water crisis in the east of Isfahan based on contextual theory. Journal of Applied Sociology, 30(1), 123–142. https://doi.org/10.22108/jas.2018.109357.1299 [In Persian]
  31. Klarner, A., & Knabe, A. (2019). Social networks and coping with poverty in rural areas. Sociologia Ruralis, 59(3), 447–473. https://doi.org/10.1111/soru.12250
  32. Laborde Debucquet, D., & Martin, W. (2018). Implications of the global growth slowdown for rural poverty. Agricultural Economics, 49(3), 325–338. https://doi.org/10.1111/agec.12419
  33. Liu, W., Zhao, M., & Xu, T. (2018). Water poverty in rural communities of arid areas in China. Water, 10(4), 505. https://doi.org/10.3390/w10040505
  34. Madani, K., & Zarezadeh, M. (2014). The significance of game structure evolution for deriving game-theoretic policy insights. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (SMC). IEEE.
  35. Mirlotfi, M., & Shahkarami, S. (2022). Analysis of the effects of villagers' idealism on rural development (Case study: Sistan Region). Journal of Rural Research, 12(4), 768–781. https://doi.org/10.22059/jrur.2021.326841.1653 [In Persian]
  36. Molle, F., Mollinga, P. P., & Wester, P. (2009). Hydraulic bureaucracies and the hydraulic mission: Flows of water, flows of power. Water Alternatives, 2(3), 328–349.
  37. Moradi, Kh., & Agahi, H. (2014). Analyzing the challenges of rural management with the qualitative approach of grounded theory. Geography and Development Quarterly, 34, 167–181. [In Persian]
  38. Osman-Elasha, B., & Sanjak, E. (2008). Livelihoods and drought in Sudan. In J. Leary (Ed.), Climate change and vulnerability. Earthscan.
  39. Pahl-Wostl, C. (2009). A conceptual framework for analyzing adaptive capacity and multi-level learning processes in resource governance regimes. Global Environmental Change, 19(3), 354–365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2009.06.001
  40. Papli-Yazdi, M. H., Jamapour, Mehdizadeh, M., & Zakani, M. (2017). Investigating the social consequences of the crisis of lack of water resources in desert areas (Case study: Ardakan city). Social Sciences Quarterly, 26(77), 99–136. [In Persian]
  41. Papzan, A. H., Qobadi, P., Zarafshani, K., & Gravandi, Sh. (2010). Problems and limitations of rural tourism using foundational theory (Case: Harir village, Kermanshah Province). Rural Research Quarterly, 1(3), 26–51. [In Persian]
  42. Piran, P. (2004). Consequences and effects of poverty and inequality in Iran / Poverty and social movements in Iran. Social Welfare, 5(18), 11–40. [In Persian]
  43. Pradhan, I., Kandapan, B., & Pradhan, J. (2022). Uneven burden of multidimensional poverty in India: A caste based analysis. PLOS ONE, 17(7), e0271806. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0271806
  44. Rahimkhani, T. (2020). Restoration of Shahdad Karan architecture based on the archeological study of Makhonik architecture. Anthropological Journal, 17(30), 97–128. https://doi.org/20.1001.1.17352096.1400.17.30.4.8 [In Persian]
  45. Rijke, J., Brown, R., Zevenbergen, C., Ashley, R., Farrelly, M., Morison, P., & Van Herk, S. (2012). Fit-for-purpose governance: A framework to make adaptive governance operational. Environmental Science and Policy, 22, 73–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2012.06.010
  46. Sullivan, C. (2001). The potential for calculating a meaningful water poverty index. Water International, 26(4), 471–480. https://doi.org/10.1080/02508060108686948
  47. Tabbiei, M., Iman, M. T., & Karimi, M. (2021). Critical ethnographic exploration of water crisis challenges in the villages of Mamsani city. Strategic Researches of Iran's Social Issues, 10(2), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.22108/srspi.2021.126606.1657 [In Persian]
  48. Talebi Soumesarai, M., Zakai, M. S., Fazeli, M., & Jumapour, M. (2019). Sociology of a crisis: Social analysis of the water crisis in Zayandeh-Rood catchment. Interdisciplinary Quarterly in Human Sciences, 11(4), 133–165. https://doi.org/10.22035/isih.2020.3652.3823 [In Persian]
  49. Torres, P. H. C., Côrtes, P. L., & Jacobi, P. R. (2020). Governing complexity and environmental justice: Lessons from the water crisis in Metropolitan São Paulo (2013-2015). Desenvolvimento e Meio Ambiente, 53, 61–77. https://doi.org/10.5380/dma.v53i0.64673
  50. World Health Organization. (2008). UN-Water Global Annual Assessment of Sanitation and Drinking-Water: 2008 pilot report testing a new reporting approach. WHO.
  51. Yazdan Panah, M., & Rahimi-Feyzabadi, F. (2019). The reasons for the failure of agricultural promotion using basic theory (Case study: Agricultural Jihad of Lorestan Province). Journal of Economic Research and Agricultural Development of Iran, 50(3), 549–575. https://doi.org/10.22059/ijaedr.2019.269598.668674 [In Persian]
دوره 17، شماره 2
تابستان 1405
صفحه 109-127

  • تاریخ دریافت 29 فروردین 1405
  • تاریخ بازنگری 15 خرداد 1405
  • تاریخ پذیرش 19 تیر 1405