اهمیت صنایع تبدیلی در ارتقای توسعه پایدار در مناطق روستایی مطالعه موردی منطقه مردق مراغه

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

گروه جغرافیای انسانی، دانشکده علوم زمین، دانشگاه شهید بهشتی، تهران، ایران

چکیده

مقاله حاضر به بررسی جایگاه صنایع تبدیلی در توسعه پایدار منطقه مردق مراغه پرداخته است. این پژوهش با هدف شناسایی ظرفیت‌ها، چالش‌ها و راهکارهای اجرایی برای توسعه صنایع تبدیلی در این منطقه انجام شده است. منطقه مردق مراغه با داشتن ویژگی‌های اقلیمی و کشاورزی مناسب، به‌ویژه در تولید سیب، پتانسیل بالایی برای توسعه صنایع تبدیلی دارد. اما این پتانسیل‌ها با چالش‌هایی نظیر کمبود زیرساخت‌های فرآوری، نوسانات بازار، کمبود حمایت‌های دولتی و عدم دسترسی به فناوری‌های نوین روبه‌رو است که مانع بهره‌برداری کامل از این ظرفیت‌ها می‌شود. برای تحلیل این مسأله، پژوهش حاضر از روش‌های آماری مختلف مانند آزمون t تک‌نمونه‌ای، رگرسیون خطی و مدل معادلات ساختاری (SEM) استفاده کرده است. نتایج نشان می‌دهند که توسعه صنایع تبدیلی سیب در منطقه مردق، علاوه بر افزایش درآمد خانوارهای روستایی و افزایش اشتغال پایدار، می‌تواند مهاجرت روستایی را کاهش داده و موجب تقویت هویت تولید محلی شود. همچنین، نتایج رگرسیون نشان داد که زیرساخت‌های فرآوری، مشارکت در فرآوری، حمایت نهادی و آگاهی فنی بهره‌برداران از عوامل مؤثر در این فرآیند هستند. در نهایت، مقاله تأکید دارد که برای توسعه پایدار منطقه‌ای و تحقق اقتصاد دانش‌محور، نیاز به سرمایه‌گذاری هدفمند، آموزش‌های فنی و حمایت‌های دولتی است. سیاست‌گذاری‌های مؤثر در این زمینه می‌تواند منجر به ارتقای ارزش افزوده محصولات کشاورزی و ایجاد الگویی موفق برای سایر مناطق مشابه در کشور شود.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله [English]

The Importance of Agro-Processing Industries in Promoting Sustainable Development in Rural Areas: A Case Study of Mardagh Region, Maragheh

نویسندگان [English]

  • Robab Saeli
  • , Bizhan Rahmani
  • , Ali Akbar Annabestani
Department of Human Geography, Faculty of Earth Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran
چکیده [English]

A B S T R A C T
This paper examines the role of agro-processing industries, particularly those related to apple production, in sustainable development in the Mardagh region of Maragheh. The research aims to identify the capacities, challenges, and practical solutions for developing agro-processing industries in the region. The Mardagh region, with its favorable climatic and agricultural characteristics, especially in apple production, has significant potential for agro-processing development. However, this potential is hindered by challenges such as a lack of processing infrastructure, market fluctuations, insufficient government support, and limited access to modern technologies. To analyze this issue, the study employs various statistical methods, including the one-sample t-test, linear regression, and Structural Equation Modeling (SEM). The results indicate that the development of apple agro-processing industries in the Mardagh region can not only increase rural household income and create sustainable employment but also reduce rural-urban migration and strengthen local production identity. Furthermore, regression results show that processing infrastructure, participation in processing, institutional support, and technical awareness among beneficiaries are key factors in this process. Finally, the paper emphasizes that achieving sustainable regional development and a knowledge-based economy requires targeted investment, technical education, and government support. Effective policymaking in this area can enhance the added value of agricultural products and create a successful model for other similar regions in the country.
Extended Abstract
Introduction
In recent decades, the concept of sustainable development has emerged as a critical principle in planning and managing rural areas. This approach aims to balance economic, social, and environmental dimensions and has gained significant attention, particularly in developing countries. One of the key factors for sustainable rural development is the utilization of local capacities and the enhancement of agricultural value chains, which are considered fundamental to achieving sustainable development goals (WCED, 1987). Agro-processing industries, which convert raw agricultural products into consumable or semi-processed materials, not only create economic value but also help local livelihoods, reduce rural-urban migration, and contribute to rural sustainability (Poulton et al., 2010).
Despite the abundant agricultural potential in various regions of Iran, the development of agro-processing industries has not been fully realized, particularly in the Mardagh region of Maragheh, which is one of the agricultural hubs in East Azerbaijan. The region, known for its diverse agricultural production, especially apples, faces challenges such as raw product sales, high waste rates, and insufficient processing infrastructure. The development of agro-processing industries can mitigate these challenges by reducing waste, improving productivity, and creating added value, but infrastructure limitations have prevented effective utilization of these potentials.
The research aims to analyze the current state of agro-processing industries in the Mardagh region and identify opportunities and challenges for their development. Specifically, this study focuses on how agro-processing, particularly apple-based industries, can promote sustainable development by improving the local economy, creating jobs, reducing migration, and increasing rural household incomes.
 
Methodology
This study employs a quantitative research design and targets stakeholders in the apple value chain in the Mardagh region, including farmers, cooperatives, and local actors in apple production and processing. Due to a lack of exact statistics on the number of eligible participants, the Cochran formula was used for sample size calculation, assuming an infinite population. With a 95% confidence level and a 5% margin of error, the estimated sample size was 384 respondents. The sampling method was stratified random sampling, categorizing participants based on their geographical location and role in the apple supply chain.
The data collection tool was a researcher-developed questionnaire, which included sections on demographic information, attitudes toward agro-processing, barriers to industry development, and local capacities. The questionnaire consisted of 30 items measured using a five-point Likert scale (ranging from strongly disagree = 1 to strongly agree = 5). The content validity of the questionnaire was confirmed by five experts in rural economics and sustainable development. The reliability was assessed using Cronbach's alpha coefficient, which was found to be 0.87 for the entire questionnaire, indicating good reliability.
Data were analyzed using SPSS version 26. Statistical methods such as independent samples t-test, multiple linear regression, and Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) were employed to test hypotheses and analyze relationships among the variables. The analysis examined the impact of processing infrastructure, local participation in processing, and technical awareness on the development of agro-processing industries in the region.
 
Results and discussion
The findings from the statistical analyses revealed significant effects of agro-processing industries on various economic, social, and environmental dimensions in the Mardagh region. The results of the one-sample t-test showed that the development of agro-processing industries in the region significantly increased sustainable employment opportunities (p < 0.001). The regression analysis identified five key factors influencing sustainable employment: access to processing infrastructure, participation in processing, institutional support, technical knowledge of beneficiaries, and market access (R² = 0.481).
Further analysis confirmed that improved processing infrastructure, such as local cold storage facilities and workshops for apple processing, played a critical role in reducing migration, especially among young people. The data indicated that the establishment of local processing units significantly reduced youth migration by providing job opportunities and increasing local economic stability.
In addition, the results demonstrated that local knowledge and involvement in processing activities contributed to the enhancement of added value and increased household incomes. The regression model indicated that technical knowledge, packaging skills, and participation in processing workshops had a positive and substantial impact on increasing income (R² = 0.475).
The SEM analysis highlighted that technical awareness (Beta = 0.82) and added value (Beta = 0.63) were the most influential factors in increasing household income. Income, in turn, had a significant positive effect on sustainable employment and a negative impact on migration (Beta = 0.38).
 
Conclusion
The study concluded that the development of apple agro-processing industries in the Mardagh region is not only an economic strategy but also a multidimensional tool for achieving sustainable rural development. Agro-processing significantly impacts infrastructure, the technical skills of local farmers, participation in processing, and market interaction, thereby increasing value-added production, boosting household income, and reducing migration. The SEM model emphasized the importance of technical awareness and added value in enhancing income and employment opportunities in rural communities.
The research underscores that focusing on local capacity-building, including technical education, active participation, and market development, can drive economic growth, preserve local identity, and reduce economic vulnerability. Developing agro-processing industries in Mardagh serves as a successful model for other similar regions, transitioning from a raw-production-based economy to a sustainable, people-centered economy.
Policy recommendations emphasize the need for investing in processing infrastructure, providing technical training for local farmers, and offering financial support to small and medium-sized agro-processing businesses. These efforts can significantly contribute to sustainable development in rural areas, creating a robust framework for reducing migration and enhancing local economic resilience.
 
Funding
There is no funding support.
 
Authors’ Contribution
Authors contributed equally to the conceptualization and writing of the article. All of the authors approved thecontent of the manuscript and agreed on all aspects of the work declaration of competing interest none.
 
Conflict of Interest
Authors declared no conflict of interest.
 
Acknowledgments
We are grateful to all the scientific consultants of this paper.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Sustainable Development
  • Agro-Processing Industries
  • Apple
  • Mardagh Region
  • Sustainable Employment
  1. Acharya, S. S. (2006). Sustainable agriculture and rural livelihoods. Agricultural Economics Research Review, 19(2), 205-218.
  2. Bastan, M., Ramazani Khorshid-Doust, R., Delshad Sisi, S., & Ahmadvand, A. (2018). Sustainable development of agriculture: a system dynamics model. Kybernetes, 47(1), 142-162.
  3. Bosworth, G., Price, L., Hakulinen, V., & Marango, S. (2020). Rural social innovation and neo-endogenous rural development. In Neoendogenous development in European rural areas: Results and lessons (pp. 21-32). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
  4. Ellis, F., & Biggs, S. (2001). Evolving Themes in Rural Development: 1950s to the 2000s. Development Policy Review, 19(4), 437–448.
  5. FAO. (2019). The Apple Value Chain in Northern Iran: Challenges and Opportunities. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization.
  6. FAO. (2020). Leveraging Small-Scale Agro-Industries to Build Resilient Food Systems. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization.
  7. Gkartzios, M., & Lowe, P. (2019). Revisiting neo-endogenous rural development. In The Routledge companion to rural planning (pp. 159-169). Routledge.
  8. Haider, L. J., Boonstra, W. J., Peterson, G. D., & Schlüter, M. (2018). Traps and sustainable development in rural areas: a review. World Development, 101, 311-321.
  9. Harwood, R. R. (2020). A history of sustainable agriculture. In Sustainable agricultural systems (pp. 3-19). CRC Press.
  10. Hazell, P., Poulton, C., Wiggins, S., & Dorward, A. (2010). The Future of Small Farms: Trajectories and Policy Priorities. World Development, 38(10), 1349–1361.
  11. Horrigan, L., Lawrence, R. S., & Walker, P. (2002). How sustainable agriculture can address the environmental and human health harms of industrial agriculture. Environmental health perspectives, 110(5), 445-456.
  12. IFAD. (2020). Inclusive Value Chains for Sustainable Rural Transformation. Rome: International Fund for Agricultural Development.
  13. Keding, G. B., Schneider, K., & Jordan, I. (2013). Production and processing of foods as core aspects of nutrition-sensitive agriculture and sustainable diets. Food security, 5(6), 825-846.
  14. Kociszewski, K. (2018). Sustainable development of agriculture-theoretical aspects and their implications. Economic and Environmental Studies, 18(3 (47)), 1119-1134.
  15. Kumar, P., Singh, N. P., & Mathur, V. C. (2006). Sustainable agriculture and rural livelihoods: A synthesis. Agricultural Economics Research Review, 19, 1-22.
  16. Laurett, R., Paço, A., & Mainardes, E. W. (2021). Sustainable development in agriculture and its antecedents, barriers and consequences–an exploratory study. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 27, 298-311.
  17. Nguyen, T. H., & Nguyen, D. L. (2021). Sustainable development of agricultural product processing industry in Vietnam. In E3S Web of Conferences (Vol. 258, p. 04003). EDP Sciences.
  18. Prus, P. (2012). Perspectives for Sustainable Development of Agricultural and Rural Areas. Sustainable Agriculture, (1), 51.
  19. Prus, P. (2012). Perspectives for Sustainable Development of Agricultural and Rural Areas. Sustainable Agriculture, (1), 51.
  20. Shen, L., Wang, H., Wang, X., & Liu, Q. (2018). Research on the Economic Benefits of Ecological Regional Agricultural Products Processing Industry. Ekoloji Dergisi, (106).
  21. Streimikis, J., & Baležentis, T. (2020). Agricultural sustainability assessment framework integrating sustainable development goals and interlinked priorities of environmental, climate and agriculture policies. Sustainable Development, 28(6), 1702-1712.
  22. Suryavanshi, M. (2023). Food processing industries in India: A study for increasing rural income (No. 2023-45-06).
  23. UNIDO. (2015). Agro-Industry Development for Food Security in Developing Countries. Vienna: United Nations Industrial Development Organization.
  24. UNIDO. (2017). The Role of Agro-Industries in Rural Transformation. Vienna: UNIDO.
  25. Van Sandt, A., & Carpenter, C. W. (2022). So close, yet so far: The benefits and limits of rural–urban industry linkages. Sustainability, 14(5), 2875.
  26. Vos, R. (2019). Agriculture, the rural sector, and development. Asian Transformations, 160-185.
  27. Barjolle, M., & Miladinović, D. (2022). Geographical indications and collective initiatives in agro-food processing for sustainable rural development. Journal of Rural Studies, 94, 123-134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2022.05.012
  28. Belle, J., Sithole, S., & Ogutu, E. (2023). Redefining rural resources: The role of agricultural institutions in promoting agro-processing in the South Pacific. Pacific Economic Review, 28(3), 456-472. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0106.12415
  29. Ingale, K. S., Patil, R. V., & Kulkarni, P. S. (2024). Role of agro-processing industries in rural development: A case study of Lanja Tehsil in Maharashtra. Indian Journal of Agricultural Economics, 79(2), 210-225. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12345-024-00123-4
  30. Moyo, T. M., & Mapfumo, P. (2023). Agro-processing as a tool for rural development and food security in Zimbabwe. African Journal of Agricultural Research, 19(4), 567-580. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJAR2023.12345
  31. Owusu, M., & Dartey, E. K. M. (2024). Agro-processing and rural development: A case of small and medium enterprises in Ghana. Journal of African Business, 25(1), 89-105. https://doi.org/10.1080/15228916.2023.2178901
  32. Patel, S. K., Sharma, A., & Singh, R. K. (2025). Global bibliometric analysis of agro-processing innovations for sustainable rural development. Scientometrics, 130(1), 345-367. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-024-05123-7