پژوهش های روستائی

پژوهش های روستائی

ارزیابی نقش جریان‌های گردشگری در توسعه کارآفرینی گردشگری روستایی مطالعه موردی: حوزه نفوذ گردشگری شهر مشهد

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان
1 گروه مدیریت گردشگری، دانشکدگان مدیریت، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران
2 گروه جغرافیا و برنامه‌ریزی روستایی، دانشکده ادبیات و علوم انسانی، دانشگاه فردوسی، مشهد، ایران
چکیده
هدف این پژوهش ارزیابی نقش جریان‌های گردشگری در پویایی کارآفرینی گردشگری در حوزه نفوذ گردشگری شهر مشهد می‌باشد. این پژوهش از روش‌شناسی توصیفی-تحلیلی و روش کتابخانه‌ای-اسنادی بهره گرفته و از نوع کاربردی است. برای سنجش کارآفرینی گردشگری از شاخص‌های استاندارد دیده‌بان جهانی کارآفرینی استفاده‌شده و جریان‌های گردشگری با هشت شاخص عملیاتی شده‌اند. جامعه آماری تحقیق شامل دهیاران، کارآفرینان و گردشگران است. از آزمون تی تک‌نمونه‌ای، همبستگی پیرسون و اسپیرمن، و تحلیل رگرسیون برای بررسی روابط متغیرها استفاده‌شده است. همچنین، مدل‌های Merec، Marcos در GIS برای تحلیل فضایی به‌کاررفته‌اند. منطقه موردمطالعه، حوزه نفوذ گردشگری شهر مشهد انتخاب‌شده است. یافته‌های پژوهش نشان می‌دهد که سطح گردشگری در منطقه مطالعه به‌طورکلی در حد متوسط ارزیابی‌شده است، که این امر لزوم تدوین سیاست‌های مؤثر برای تقویت فعالیت‌های گردشگری را نشان می‌دهد. نتایج حاصل از تحلیل آماری بیانگر آن است که گردشگری با کارآفرینی در نواحی روستایی رابطه مثبت و معناداری دارد (R=0.81). بااین‌حال، در برخی روستاها با وجود ضعف در جذب گردشگر، سطح بالایی از کارآفرینی مشاهده شد که به استفاده خلاقانه از منابع بومی بازمی‌گردد. تحلیل فضایی در محیط GIS نیز نشان داد که عوامل محیطی، زیرساختی و اجتماعی نقش تعیین‌کننده‌ای در موفقیت فعالیت‌های کارآفرینانه در مناطق روستایی دارند. نتایج بررسی در این زمینه نشان می‌دهند جریان گردشگری می‌تواند نقش کلیدی در توسعه کارآفرینی ایفا کند و برنامه‌ریزی‌های آینده باید بر تقویت آن و بهره‌گیری بهینه از ظرفیت‌های منطقه متمرکز شوند.
کلیدواژه‌ها
موضوعات

عنوان مقاله English

Assessing the Role of Tourism Flows in the Development of Rural Tourism Entrepreneurship: A case study of Tourism Hinterland of Mashhad City

نویسندگان English

Hamide Hahmoodi 1
Hamid Shayan 2
Hamdollah Sojasi Qeidari 2
1 Department of Tourism Management, College of Management, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
2 Department of Geography and Rural Planning, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran
چکیده English

A B S T R A C T
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the role of tourism flows in enhancing tourism entrepreneurship dynamics within the tourism influence zone of Mashhad City. This research employs a descriptive–analytical methodology and a library–documentary approach and is applied in nature. The assessment of tourism entrepreneurship was conducted using the standardized indicators of the Global Entrepreneurship Monitor (GEM), while tourism flows were operationalized through eight specific indicators. The statistical population includes rural administrators (dehyars), entrepreneurs, and tourists. To examine the relationships among variables, one-sample t-test, Pearson and Spearman correlation coefficients, and regression analysis were applied. Moreover, the MEREC and MARCOS models were utilized within the GIS environment for spatial analysis.The study area comprises the tourism influence zone of Mashhad City. The findings indicate that the overall level of tourism in the region is moderate, highlighting the need for effective policies to strengthen tourism activities. Statistical analysis results reveal a positive and significant relationship between tourism flows and rural entrepreneurship (R = 0.81). However, in some villages with relatively weak tourism inflows, a high level of entrepreneurship was observed due to the creative utilization of local resources. Spatial analysis further demonstrated that environmental, infrastructural, and social factors play a decisive role in the success of entrepreneurial activities in rural areas. Overall, the results suggest that tourism flows can play a pivotal role in fostering entrepreneurship, and future planning should focus on strengthening these flows and optimizing the use of regional capacities.
Extended Abstract
Introduction
In the early decades of the twenty-first century, developing countries continue to face persistent challenges to sustainable development, with rural areas being particularly affected. Previous development policies and strategies, predominantly urban-oriented and technocratic in nature, have proven insufficient in addressing the specific needs, capacities, and structural conditions of rural regions. As a result, many rural areas have experienced entrenched poverty, rising out-migration, declining living standards, and enduring infrastructural shortcomings. In response to these challenges, scholars and policymakers have increasingly called for a reorientation of development paradigms toward the activation of local capacities, with tourism emerging as a key component of innovative rural development approaches.
Tourism, as one of the fastest-growing sectors of the global economy, has played a significant role in promoting economic growth, employment creation, and more balanced income distribution. Through its capacity to connect a wide range of rural activities, including agriculture, handicrafts, and local services, tourism supports economic diversification and contributes to the revitalization of rural communities. In addition to enhancing local livelihoods and alleviating rural-to-urban migration pressures, tourism enables multidimensional flows of capital, culture, and information, which in turn contribute to the accumulation of economic and social capital at the local level.
Within this context, tourism entrepreneurship, particularly in rural settings, has emerged as a key driver of endogenous and place-based development. It provides a framework for mobilizing local resources and capabilities in order to generate and more equitably distribute economic benefits within rural communities. Consequently, rural tourism development is widely regarded as an effective strategy for addressing rural underdevelopment and strengthening the economic and social foundations of local areas.
This study focuses on tourism-receiving villages located within the broader tourism catchment area of Mashhad, Iran. As Mashhad has evolved into the country’s second-largest metropolis and a major center of pilgrimage tourism, the increasing volume of visitors has gradually extended the city’s tourism sphere of influence into surrounding rural areas. These villages, which are becoming progressively integrated into Mashhad’s metropolitan system, possess substantial tourism potential. If managed effectively, this potential can stimulate tourism entrepreneurship, create employment opportunities, improve local infrastructure, and reduce rural out-migration toward the city. Accordingly, the main objective of this study is to examine the role of tourism flows in stimulating and sustaining tourism entrepreneurship within this regional setting.

Methodology
This applied study adopts a descriptive–analytical approach and relies on library-based and documentary sources for data collection. To assess tourism entrepreneurship, standardized indicators derived from the Global Entrepreneurship Monitor (GEM) were localized and refined through consultation with a panel of fifteen academic experts, resulting in thirty-six items grouped into fourteen indicators and structured across three analytical dimensions. Primary data were collected using a five-point Likert-scale questionnaire administered to rural entrepreneurs.
Tourism flows were analyzed across three dimensions, namely tourist, commodity, and capital flows, using eight indicators derived from institutional statistics and semi-structured interviews with key stakeholders. The reliability of the research instruments was confirmed using Cronbach’s alpha coefficient, which exceeded the threshold value of 0.70 and indicated satisfactory internal consistency. Quantitative data analysis was conducted using one-sample t-tests, Pearson and Spearman correlation coefficients, and linear regression analysis in order to assess indicator mean values, examine relationships among variables, and evaluate the magnitude of tourism’s impact on entrepreneurship. In addition, spatial analysis was carried out within a GIS environment using the multi-criteria decision-making models MEREC and MARCOS, together with the Natural Breaks (Jenks) classification method.
To operationalize the study, the tourism sphere of influence of Mashhad was selected as the study area, given the city’s pivotal role in attracting millions of pilgrims and tourists each year and its substantial influence on rural tourism development in surrounding areas. Tourists’ destination choices within this region are shaped by factors such as the attractiveness of destinations, distance from Mashhad, and the quality of access routes. To delineate the tourism sphere of influence, a modified Ruppert model was applied, in which the radius of influence was calculated using appropriate distance and population parameters. In order to account for variations among Mashhad’s access corridors with respect to tourist volume, number of attractions, and route quality, weighting coefficients were incorporated into the model. Subsequently, the tourism sphere of influence for each corridor was calculated separately, and the final boundary was delineated using ArcGIS software. The findings indicate that 167 villages within the defined sphere of influence possess tourism attractions, including historical–cultural, religious, and natural sites. To determine the sample size, the n₀ formula was applied, resulting in the selection of 22 villages as the study sample. Sample villages were chosen based on the presence of multiple tourism attractions and relatively high levels of tourist visitation.

Results and Discussion
In this study, the mean values of tourism entrepreneurship indicators were evaluated using a one-sample t-test. The results show that the observed means of all indicators exceed the theoretical midpoint value of 3 and fall within a moderate to high range. The statistical significance of the results across all indicators confirms their generalizability to the study population. Furthermore, the positive lower and upper confidence intervals indicate that these indicators exert a favorable influence on the development of tourism entrepreneurship in tourist-oriented villages located within the tourism sphere of influence of Mashhad. Among the examined indicators, entrepreneurial orientation emerged as the most influential factor in promoting tourism entrepreneurship. By contrast, the mean value of the tourism flow indicator was at a moderate level, suggesting the need for supportive policies to enhance its role in strengthening tourism entrepreneurship.
The results of the statistical analyses reveal a positive, strong, and statistically significant relationship between tourism flows and tourism entrepreneurship in the sampled villages. Pearson correlation analysis indicates that tourism flows are directly and significantly associated with all three dimensions of tourism entrepreneurship, namely entrepreneurial orientation, entrepreneurial capability, and entrepreneurial motivation. These findings are further supported by the regression analysis, which shows that the intensity of tourism flows accounts for a substantial proportion of the variance in tourism entrepreneurship (R = 0.81, R² = 0.64).
However, spatial analysis and field observations indicate that this relationship is not uniform across all villages and is moderated by contextual factors such as environmental capacity, local livelihood structures, and prevailing social attitudes. In some villages, relatively high levels of tourism entrepreneurship were observed despite limited tourism flows, largely as a result of the effective use of distinctive natural and agricultural resources. Conversely, in other villages, a strong dependence on traditional economic activities limited the adoption of tourism-related entrepreneurial initiatives, even where tourist inflows were relatively high. These findings suggest that although tourism flows represent a necessary condition for the development of tourism entrepreneurship, they are not sufficient in isolation. Instead, tourism entrepreneurship arises from the interaction between tourism demand and local environmental, cultural, and social capacities, together with the ability of local communities to respond to emerging economic opportunities.
To analyze the spatial distribution of tourism entrepreneurship at the level of the studied rural settlements, the multi-criteria decision-making models MEREC and MARCOS were employed. The ranking results indicate that the village of Miami exhibits the highest level of tourism entrepreneurship, while Andarok ranks lowest from the perspective of local entrepreneurs. Spatial classification conducted using the Natural Breaks (Jenks) method within a GIS environment further shows that Miami, Radkan, and Piveh-Zhen are in the most favorable condition, whereas Tabadkan, Darbeheshat, Khajeh-Hosseinabad, Kalateh-Ahan, and Andarok fall within the least favorable category in terms of tourism entrepreneurship.
Examination of the relationships between MARCOS model scores and spatial variables indicates that socio-demographic and environmental factors, including precipitation, elevation, literacy rate, age structure, household characteristics, and population attributes, have strong and statistically significant associations with tourism entrepreneurship. Moreover, infrastructure availability, accommodation and hospitality services, and accessibility demonstrate strong relationships with entrepreneurship levels, underscoring the critical role of service provision and infrastructure development in strengthening rural tourism and fostering local entrepreneurship. By contrast, variables such as the number of attractions, climate type, and slope show moderate relationships, while distance to water resources exhibits weak or statistically insignificant associations.
Overall, the findings indicate that the development of tourism entrepreneurship in rural areas is shaped by the combined influence of environmental conditions, socio-demographic capacities, and infrastructural and service-related factors. Accordingly, reliance on a single dimension is insufficient, and an integrated, multidimensional approach is essential for both analyzing and promoting tourism entrepreneurship in rural destinations.

Conclusion
In this study, tourism entrepreneurship is examined as a key driver of economic, social, and environmental development in rural areas located within the sphere of influence of Mashhad. The findings suggest that strengthening tourism entrepreneurship requires an approach that extends beyond a sole focus on increasing tourist arrivals and instead emphasizes targeted investment, capacity building, supportive policies, and the effective use of local environmental and human resources. Tourism entrepreneurship contributes substantially to job creation, increases in household income, reduced dependence on traditional agricultural activities, and the mitigation of rural out-migration, thereby enhancing social welfare and stability in rural communities.
The results demonstrate that tourism flows play a decisive role in shaping the dynamics of tourism entrepreneurship in the study area. Overall, tourism entrepreneurship indicators were assessed at a moderate to high level, with entrepreneurial orientation identified as the most influential dimension. Correlation and regression analyses revealed a strong and statistically significant relationship between tourism flows and entrepreneurial orientation, capability, and motivation (R = 0.81). Nevertheless, the moderate intensity of tourism flows observed in several villages underscores the need for more supportive and targeted policy interventions to strengthen their entrepreneurial impacts.
Spatial analysis revealed considerable intra-regional disparities among villages. Some villages, including Piveh-Zhen and Azghad, exhibit high levels of tourism entrepreneurship despite relatively weak tourism flows, largely due to the effective utilization of natural resources and local capacities. By contrast, the village of Darbeheshat, despite experiencing strong tourist inflows, demonstrates weaker entrepreneurial performance as a result of its continued reliance on traditional agricultural activities and the limited diversification of its economic functions. The results of the multi-criteria decision-making models MEREC and MARCOS further indicate that the villages of Miami, Radkan, and Piveh-Zhen rank highest in terms of tourism entrepreneurship, whereas Tabadkan, Darbeheshat, Khajeh-Hosseinabad, Kalateh-Ahan, and Andarok occupy the lowest positions.
These spatial variations are largely shaped by environmental, infrastructural, and socio-demographic factors, including precipitation patterns, elevation, literacy levels, population age structure, the quality of infrastructure and accommodation services, and accessibility. Overall, the findings are consistent with previous studies and underscore that the development of rural tourism entrepreneurship is the result of a complex interaction among tourism flows, supportive infrastructure, social capital, managerial policies, and environmental capacities.
Accordingly, the study highlights the necessity of adopting a comprehensive and multidimensional approach to strengthening tourism entrepreneurship in rural areas, one that simultaneously addresses tourism demand, local resource endowments, community empowerment, and institutional support. Such an integrated approach can contribute to sustainable, inclusive, and balanced rural tourism development in Razavi Khorasan Province.

Funding
This research was funded by the Tehran Urban Studies and Planning Center.

Authors’ Contribution
Authors contributed equally to the conceptualization and writing of the article. All of the authors approved the content of the manuscript and agreed on all aspects of the work declaration of competing interest none.

Conflict of Interest
Authors declared no conflict of interest.

Acknowledgments
We are grateful to all the scientific consultants of this paper.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Development
Rural Tourism
Entrepreneurship
Village
MARCOS Model
  1. بهرامی، رحمت‌الله. (1389). چالش‌های عمده توسعه روستایی (مطالعه موردی استان کردستان). فصلنامه تحقیقات جغرافیایی، ۲۵ (۳)، ۱۲۵-۱۴۲.
  2. پورروحانی، ماجده؛ پورجعفر، محمدرضا و یدقار، علی. (1395). اهداف، ارکان و الزامات برنامه‌ریزی گردشگری روستایی با تأکید بر بوم – گردشگری، نمونه مطالعاتی: روستای شیاده، شهرستان بابل. مجله مسکن و محیط، ۳۵ (۱۵۵)، 126-109.
  3. حبیبی کوشکوهی، حسن؛ منشی‌زاده، رحمت اله و رضویان، محمدتقی. (1398). تبیین نقش گردشگری در کارآفرینی نواحی روستایی (مطالعه موردی: روستاهای شهرستان املش و رودسر). مطالعات برنامه‌ریزی سکونتگاه‌های انسانی (چشم‌انداز جغرافیایی)، 14(2)، ۳۰۵-۳۱۹. https://doi.org/10.30488/gps.2020.200679.3097
  4. حیدری، علی‌اکبر؛ روشن، سید علیقلی و نادری, نادر. (1398). تأثیر بازاریابی گردشگری (آمیخته محل و مردم) بر توسعه کارآفرینی روستایی منطقه ریجاب استان کرمانشاه. پژوهش‌های روستائی، 10(4), 582-595. https://doi.org/10.22059/jrur.2019.280936.1358
  5. داداش پور، هاشم و تدین، سپیده. (1394). شناسایی پهنه‌های همگن جریانی بر اساس جابجایی‌های فضایی و الگوهای سفر مطالعه موردی: منطقه کلان‌شهری تهران. فصلنامه مطالعات شهری، ۱۴ (۱۴)،‌ ۶۱-۷۶.
  6. دادورخانی، فضیله؛ رضوانی، محمدرضا؛ ایمنی قشلاق، سیاوش و بوزرجمهری، خدیجه. (1392). تحلیل نقش گردشگری در توسعه ویژگی‌های کارآفرینانه و گرایش به کارآفرینی در بین جوانان روستایی (مطالعه موردی: روستای کندوان و اسکندان شهرستان اسکو). مجله پژوهش‌های جغرافیای انسانی، ۷۸ (۷۸)، ۱۶۹-۱۹۶.
  7. ذبیحی، اسماعیل. (1395). طراحی مدل بازاریابی گردشگری ورزشی استان مازندران. رساله دکتری، دانشگاه مازندران، دانشکده تربیت‌بدنی و علوم ورزشی، مازندران.
  8. رومیانی، احمد؛ شایان، حمید؛ دهبانژاد، اکبر و روشنایی، حامد. (1396). سرمایه‌گذاری خانوادگی با منشأ شهری، راهبری برای توسعه پایدار روستایی، مطالعه موردی: دهستان صائین قلعه شهرستان ابهر. مجله جغرافیا و توسعه ناحیه‌ای، 15(۲)، 44-21.‌ https://doi.org/10.22067/geography.v15i2.47495
  9. قادری، اسماعیل؛ کیائی، بتول؛ فقیهی، ابوالحسن و محمودزاده، سیدمجتبی. (1402). حکمرانی مقصد گردشگری با رویکردی کارآفرینانه. گردشگری و توسعه، 12(3)، 43-58.  https://doi.org/10.22034/jtd.2022.354416.2646
  10. قدیری معصوم، مجتبی؛ باغیانی، حمیدرضا و نورانی، حمیده. (1391). نقش گردشگری روستایی در روابط شهر و روستا در شهرستان طالقان. برنامه‌ریزی فضایی، ۲ (۱)، 48-27. https://dor.isc.ac/dor/20.1001.1.22287485.1391.2.1.2.2
  11. محمدی یگانه، بهروز؛ عینالی، جمشید و بیگدلی، اعظم. (1393). نقش کارآفرینی در توسعه مناطق با تأکید بر گردشگری، مورد: دهستان حصار ولیعصر، شهرستان اوج. فصلنامه برنامه‌ریزی منطقه‌ای، 6 (۲۱)، 204-193. https://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.22516735.1395.6.21.15.3
  12. ملاشاهی، غلامعباس و تبریزی دوخت فرد. (1393). اهمیت کارآفرینی و نقش آن در توسعه جوامع روستایی. مجموعه مقالات همایش ملی جهاد اقتصادی و تولید ثروت.
  13. یاسوری، مجید و وطنخواه کلزوری، ژیلا. (1394). نقش گردشگری در توسعه کارآفرینی زنان روستایی (دهستان گورابپس شهرستان فومن). مجله مطالعات جغرافیایی مناطق خشک، ۶ (۲۰)، ۴۶- ۵۹.
  14. عنابستانی، علی اکبر و محمودی، حمیده. (1395). بررسی تأثیر گردشگری مذهبی بر ارتقاء کیفیت زندگی روستاییان (مطالعه موردی: حوزه نفوذ گردشگاهی شهر مشهد). برنامه‌ریزی و توسعه گردشگری، ۵ (۱۸)،‌ ۹۷- ۱۱۸.
  1. Alrawadieh, Z., Altinay, L., Cetin, G., & Şimşek, D. (2021). The interface between hospitality and tourism entrepreneurship, integration and well-being: A study of refugee entrepreneurs. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 97, 103013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2021.103013
  2. Anabestani, A., & Mahmoodi, H. (2016). The effects of religious tourism on improvement of rural life quality (Case study: Rural areas of Mashhad). Journal of Tourism Planning and Development, 5(18), 97-118.  [in Persian]
  3. Ateljevic, J. (2008). Tourism entrepreneurship and regional development: Example from New Zealand. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour & Research, 15(3). https://doi.org/10.1108/13552550910957355
  4. Bahrami, R. (2010). Major challenges of rural development: A case study of Kurdistan Province. Geographical Research Quarterly, 25(3), 125-142. [in Persian]
  5. Besculides, A., Lee, M. E., & McCormick, P. J. (2002). Residents' perceptions of the cultural benefits of tourism. Annals of Tourism Research, 29(2), 303-319. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0160-7383(01)00066-4
  6. Bujdosó, Z., Dávid, L., Tőzsér, A., Kovács, G., Major-Kathi, V., Uakhitova, G., ... & Vasvári, M. (2015). Basis of heritagization and cultural tourism development. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 188, 307-315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.03.399
  7. Byrd, E., Bosley, H., & Dronberger, M. (2009). Comparisons of stakeholder perceptions of tourism impacts in rural eastern North Carolina. Tourism Management, 30(1), 693-703. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2008.10.021
  8. Coccossis, H. (2008). Cultural heritage, local resources and sustainable tourism. International Journal of Services Technology and Management, 10(1), 8-14. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSTM.2008.02034
  9. Dadashpoor, H., & Tadayon, S. (2015). Identification of the homogeneous flow zones based on spatial motilities and trip patterns in Tehran Metropolitan Region. Motaleate Shahri, 14(14), 61-76. [in Persian]
  10. Dadvarkhani, F., Rezvani, M. R., Imani Gheshlagh, S., & Bozorgmehri, K. (2013). Analysis of the role of tourism in developing entrepreneurial characteristics and orientation among rural youth: Case study of Kandovan and Eskandan villages, Osku County. Journal of Human Geography Research, 78(78), 169-196. [in Persian]
  11. Figueiredo, E., & Raschi, A. (2013). Trekking out of the crisis: Is there a role for rural tourism? Working Group Number 17, XXV ESRS Congress, Florence, Italy. http://www.florenceesrs2013.com
  12. Gallego, M. S., Ledesma-Rodriguez, F. J., & Pérez-Rodriguez, J. V. (2015). International trade and tourism flows: An extension of the gravity model. Economic Modelling, 52, 1026-1033. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2015.10.043
  13. García, M. Á., González-Rodríguez, M. R., & Vega-Vázquez, M. (2019). Does sun-and-sea all-inclusive tourism contribute to poverty alleviation and/or income inequality reduction? The case of the Dominican Republic. Journal of Travel Research, 58(6), 995-1013. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047287518789272
  14. Getz, D., & Petersen, T. (2005). Growth and profit-oriented entrepreneurship among family business owners in the tourism and hospitality industry. Hospitality Management, 24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2004.06.007
  15. Ghadiri, E., Kiaei, B., Faghihi, A., & Mahmoudzadeh, S. M. (2023). Destination governance with an entrepreneurial approach. Tourism and Development, 12(3), 43-58. https://doi.org/10.22034/jtd.2022.354416.2646 [in Persian]
  16. Ghadiri Masoum, M., Baghiyani, H. R., & Noorani, H. (2012). The role of rural tourism in urban-rural relations in Taleqan County. Journal of Spatial Planning, 2(1), 27-48. https://dor.isc.ac/dor/20.1001.1.22287485.1391.2.1.2.2 [in Persian]
  17. Guo, Y., Zhang, J., Zhang, Y., & Zheng, C. (2018). Examining the relationship between social capital and community residents' perceived resilience in tourism destinations. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 26(6), 973-986. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2018.1428335
  18. Habibi Kaveshkouhi, H., Monshizade, R., & Razavian, M. T. (2021). Survey of rural tourism status and its role in rural development with emphasis on entrepreneurship (Case study: The villages of Amlash and Rudsar). Geographical Planning of Space Quarterly Journal, 14(2), 305-319. https://doi.org/10.30488/gps.2020.200679.3097 [in Persian]
  19. Heidary, A. A., Rowshan, S. A., & Naderi, N. (2020). The effect of tourism marketing (local mixture and people) on the development of rural entrepreneurship in Rijab Region of Kermanshah Province. Journal of Rural Research, 10(4), 582-595. https://doi.org/10.22059/jrur.2019.280936.1358 [in Persian]
  20. Jaafar, M., Rasoolimanesh, S. M., & Tuan Lonik, K. A. (2015). Tourism growth and entrepreneurship: Empirical analysis of development of rural highlands. Tourism Management Perspectives, 14, 17-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tmp.2015.02.001
  21. Jian, H., Pan, H., Xiong, G., & Lin, X. (2016). The impacts of civil airport layout to Yunnan local tourism industry. World Conference on Transport Research - WCTR 2016 Shanghai, 10-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2017.05.383
  22. Jin, C., Cheng, J., Xu, J., & Huang, Z. (2018). Self-driving tourism induced carbon emission flows and its determinants in well-developed regions: A case study of Jiangsu Province, China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 186(10), 191-202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.128
  23. Li, X., Meng, F., & Uysal, M. (2008). Spatial pattern of tourist flows among the Asia-Pacific countries: An examination over a decade. Asia Pacific Journal of Tourism Research, 13(3), 229-243. https://doi.org/10.1080/10941660802280323
  24. Liu, B., Huang, S., & Fu, H. (2017). An application of network analysis on tourist attractions: The case of Xinjiang, China. Tourism Management, 58, 132-141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2016.10.009
  25. Lordkipanidze, M. (2002). Enhancing entrepreneurship in rural tourism for sustainable regional development: The case of Söderslätt region, Sweden. International Institute for Industrial Environmental Economics, Lund University. http://www.iiiee.lu.se/Publication.nsf/$webAll/B5D2127CFCFB6D78C1256CCC002E912C/$FILE/Report_2002_10.pdf
  26. Mahmoodi, H., Shayan, H., Sojasi Qeidari, H., Sadeghloo, T., & Minaei, M. (2022). Spatial analysis of tourism development potential of tourism destination villages (Case study: Mashhad tourism sphere of influence). Journal of Research and Rural Planning, 11(2), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.22067/jrrp.v11i2.87483
  27. Marrocu, E., & Paci, R. (2013). Different tourists to different destinations. Evidence from spatial interaction models. Tourism Management, 39, 71-83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2012.10.009
  28. McKercher, B., & Lew, A. A. (2004). Tourist flows and the spatial distribution of tourists. Blackwell Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470752272.ch3
  29. Meaza, H., Frankl, A., Poesen, J., Zenebe, A., Deckers, J., Van Eetvelde, V., Demissie, B., Ghebreyohannes Asfaha, T., & Nyssen, J. (2017). Natural resource opportunities and challenges for rural development in marginal grabens: The state of the art with implications for the Rift Valley system in Ethiopia. Journal of Arid Environments, 147, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaridenv.2017.08.003
  30. Mohammadi Yeganeh, B., Einali, J., & Bigdeli, A. (2014). The role of entrepreneurship in regional development with emphasis on tourism: Case study of Hesar Vali-Asr Rural District, Owj County. Quarterly Journal of Regional Planning, 6(21), 193-204. https://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.22516735.1395.6.21.15.3 [in Persian]
  31. Molashahi, G. A., & Tabrizi Dukht Fard. (2014). The importance of entrepreneurship and its role in rural community development. Quarterly Journal of Agricultural and Natural Resources Engineering, 12(44), 28-32. [in Persian]
  32. Moren-Alegret, R., Fatorić, S., Wladyka, D., Mas-Palacios, A., & Lucinda Fonseca, M. (2018). Challenges in achieving sustainability in Iberian rural areas and small towns: Exploring immigrant stakeholders' perceptions in Alentejo, Portugal, and Empordà, Spain. Journal of Rural Studies. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2018.05.005
  33. Moscardo, G., Konovalov, E., Murphy, L., McGehee, N. G., & Schurmann, A. (2017). Linking tourism to social capital in destination communities. Journal of Destination Marketing & Management, 6(4), 286-295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdmm.2017.10.001
  34. Pasakarnis, G., Morley, D., & Maliene, V. (2013). Rural development and challenges establishing sustainable land use in Eastern European countries. Land Use Policy, 30, 703-710. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2012.05.011
  35. Porto, N., & Garbero, N. (2018). Spatial distribution of touristic flows in a gravity model in South America. Journal of Tourism Analysis: Revista de Análisis Turístico, 25(1), 39-53. https://doi.org/10.1108/JTA-02-2018-0005
  36. Pourrohani, M., Pourjafar, M. R., & Yadghar, A. (2016). Objectives, elements and necessities of rural tourism planning with emphasis on eco-tourism (Case study: Shiadeh Village, Babol, Iran). Housing and Environment Journal, 35(155), 109-126. [in Persian]
  37. Roumiani, A., Shaygan, H., Dehbanjad, A., & Roshanai, H. (2017). Urban-origin family investment as a driver for sustainable rural development: Case study of Sa'in Qaleh Rural District, Abhar County. Journal of Geography and Regional Development, 15(2), 21-44. https://doi.org/10.22067/geography.v15i2.47495 [in Persian]
  38. Sharma, G. D., Taheri, B., Cichon, D., Parihar, J. S., & Kharbanda, A. (2024). Using innovation and entrepreneurship for creating edge in service firms: A review research of tourism and hospitality industry. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 9(4), 100572. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2024.100572
  39. Sokhanvara, A., Çiftçioglua, S., & Javid, E. (2018). Another look at tourism-economic development nexus. Tourism Management Perspectives, 26, 97-106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tmp.2018.03.002
  40. Sotiriadis, M. (2018). Entrepreneurship and entrepreneurs in tourism. In The Emerald handbook of entrepreneurship in tourism, travel and hospitality (pp. 3-17). https://doi.org/10.1108/9781787435292
  41. Xing-zhu, Z., & Qun, W. (2014). Exploratory space-time analysis of inbound tourism flows to China cities. International Journal of Tourism Research, 16, 303-312. https://doi.org/10.1002/jtr.1932
  42. Yasouri, M., & Vatan Khah Kalzoori, Z. (2015). The role of tourism in rural women's entrepreneurship development: Case study of Gurabpas Rural District, Fuman County. Journal of Geographical Studies of Arid Regions, 6(20). [in Persian]
  43. Yuxi, Z., & Linsheng, Z. (2020). Identifying conflicts tendency between nature-based tourism development and ecological protection in China. Ecological Indicators, 109, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.105791
  44. Zabihi, E. (2016). Designing a sports tourism marketing model for Mazandaran Province [Doctoral dissertation, University of Mazandaran]. [in Persian]
  45. Zamora, O. M. (2011). Development instruments for the cross-border cooperation in Ukraine. In K. Krzyżanowska (Ed.), Problems of tourism development on rural areas (pp. 109-121). Warsaw University of Life Sciences Press.
  46. Zeng, X., Li, Y., Zhang, C., & Yang, X. (2024). Sustainable entrepreneurship in tourism: The interaction between tourism enterprise and community. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, 60, 429-440. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhtm.2024.09.001
  47. Zhang, J. (2009). Spatial distribution of inbound tourism in China: Determinants and implications. Tourism and Hospitality Research, 9(1), 32-49. https://doi.org/10.1057/thr.2008.41
  48. Zhou, J. (2021). Statistical research on the development of rural tourism economy industry under the background of big data. Mobile Information Systems. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/9152173
دوره 17، شماره 1
بهار 1405
صفحه 157-174

  • تاریخ دریافت 27 دی 1404
  • تاریخ بازنگری 08 اسفند 1404
  • تاریخ پذیرش 14 فروردین 1405