اثرات مهاجرت فرزندان بر حمایت اجتماعی والدین سالمند روستایی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی دکتری جمعیت شناسی دانشگاه تهران

2 عضو هیات علمی دانشگاه تهران، دانشکده علوم اجتماعی، گروه جمعیت شناسی

چکیده

مهاجرت پدیدهای رایج در بیشتر روستاهای ایران میباشد، با این همه در مورد اثرات این مهاجرتها بر کسانی که در روستا باقی ماندهاند، کمتر تحقیق شده است. این مقاله، به بررسی اثرات مهاجرت فرزندان بر حمایت اجتماعی سالمندان روستایی در شهرستان بردسکن میپردازد. در مناطق روستایی این منطقه، اغلب خانوادهها با تعدادی یا تمام فرزندان مهاجر مواجه هستند. برای رسیدن به هدف تحقیق، 357 سالمند روستایی دارای حداقل یک فرزند زنده، مورد مصاحبه ساختمند قرار گرفتند. روش تحقیق به صورت پیمایشی و با اتکاء بر پرسشنامه محققساخته بود که در تنظیم آن از پرسشنامههای استاندارد و معمول بهره گرفته شد. پاسخگویان به شیوه نمونهگیری چندمرحلهای و ترکیبی از روش نمونهگیری خوشهای و نمونهگیری تصادفی ساده از 9 روستا انتخاب شدند. نتایج نشان داد که مهاجرت فرزندان اثری منفی بر حمایت عاطفی و حمایت ابزاری والدین سالمند دارد، در عین حال، والدین از حمایت مادی فرزندان مهاجر بهره میبرند. به نظر میرسد، فرزندان مهاجر با حمایت مادی بیشتر به دنبال جبران کاستیهای خود در جنبههای دیگر حمایت اجتماعی هستند. به طور کلی، اثر مهاجرت فرزندان بر جنبههای مختلف حمایت اجتماعی والدین سالمند دیده شد اما اثرات آن به گونه متفاوتی است و والدین سالمند، از مهاجرت فرزندان خود هم متضرر و هم بهرهمند میشوند.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

Effects of Out-Migration of Children on social support of aged rural parents left behind

نویسندگان [English]

  • Hossein Zarghami 1
  • Hossein Mahmoodian 2
1
2
چکیده [English]

Introduction

Out-migration is a common phenomenon to the most villages in Iran, however, there are few studies about the effects of migration on those who left behind in the villages. In this paper, we attempt to find out the effects of children s out-migration on social support of aged parents who left behind in the villages of Bardaskan. In Rural areas of this region, most families faces with some or all children that migrate. Based on census data, between “2006-2011”, the rural population of Bardaskan has decrease about 2000. At the same time, In rural areas, the percentage of 60 years old and above persons have been 2 times more than urban areas (12.2 vs 6.2). This figure shows high out-migration of adults and youngsters while older people stay because they unable or unwilling to leave villages. Then, the study question is: what is the impacts of out-migration of children on older parents who stay in rural areas.

Methodology
 For the purpose of the study, 357 older people that at least had one surviving child, have been interviewed by a structured questionnaire. Respondents have been selected based on multi-stage sampling and a combination of cluster and simple random sampling from 9 villages.to define dependent variables, We modified existing measures, taking into account the importance in the region context of the family and of children. We measured received support (instrumental, financial and emotional), and perceived adequacy of support from children. The answers contained a five option from very much to nothing. There were 2, 2 and 3 questions for measuring financial, emotional and instrumental support respectively. We defined an out-migrant child as a child living outside the parent’s district of residence (outside of village) for a minimum of the past 6 months. We used minimum of 6 months to avoid temporary absences. Considering asked name of destination of migration, we could calculate the interval of migration. In final analysis, the answers classified in 7 categories.
Results
 in our research, 357 questioners used for analytical purposes. The number of males and females almost are the same and females are more just 3 people. At the time of study, about 64% of the interviewed persons (old parents) were married, but share of women of widows was very mush more and close to 83% of them were females. Most respondents were illiterate and just 103 people could read and write. close to 70% of sample had income below 5000000 and about 48% below 3000000 monthly. This figure shows the extent of poverty among rural elders. In the study sample of 357 parents, 68.1% lived with at least one child stayed in the district and at least one child migrated, 9% lived with all children (without any migrated children), and, others do not have any co-resident child. bivariate correlations showed The interval between child and parents (migration of children) have a positive relationship with financial support and negative relationship with instrumental and emotional support. other characteristics of children have a meaningful relation with social support and this shows that the personal characteristics of children is very important factors in providing social support. The interesting point is that the strongest relation have seen between social support (three types) and migration of children. Among characteristics of parents, some variables don t have a meaningful relation with sicial support. Especially, literacy status does not have any correlation with these three aspects of social support. Sex of parent have a positive relation with financial support, this means that children s financial support to mothers is more than fathers. To control most variables in one model, use of multivariate regression is appropriate and common. Here, based on level of measurement of variables (interval scales), we apply multivariate (stepwise method) regression for three aspect of social support. The results showed that out-migration of children highly limit family networks and interactions. Also, that have negative effects on emotional and instrumental support of elder parents. At the same time, elders have benefits of material supports of that migration.
Results: We find contradictory effect of migration of children on these three types, while it is positive effect on financial support, negative effects on instrumental and emotional have been seen.
Conclusion
It seems that the children who migrate, by financial support, are seeking the ways to compensate the shortages driven by other supports. In Sum, the effects of children s out-migration on aged parents have seen, but the effects are various and parents get benefits and losses. The reader should not forget the role of other variables in this processes. At least, 4 variables are very important including health, income and marital status of olds persons and income level of children. In fact, both characteristics of parents and children have their independent role.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Social support
  • random and cluster Sampling
  • Elder
  • Social network
  • Bardaskan
پهلوان‌زاده، فرهاد و جاراللهی، عذرا، 1390، بررسی تأثیر عوامل اجتماعی بر سلامت روان سالمندان روستایی، فصلنامة توسعة روستایی، دورة سوم، شمارة 1، صص. 84-65.
کوششی، مجید، 1387، شبکة خانوادگی، ترتیبات زندگی و سلامت سالخوردگان در بستر گذار جمعیتی (مطالعه‌ای در شهر تهران)، پایان‌نامة دکتری جمعیت‌شناسی، دانشکدة علوم اجتماعی، دانشگاه تهران.
موزر، س.ک. و ج کالتون، 1368، روش تحقیق در علوم اجتماعی، ترجمة کاظم ایزدی، تهران: انتشارات کیهان.
 Melanie [A1] A., Sureeporn Punpuing & Tawanchai Jirapramupitak, 2009, Psychological Wellbeing, Physical Impairments and Rural aging in a Developing Country Setting, Health and Quality of Life Outcomes.
 Bean, Frank D., George C. Myers, Jacqueline L. Angel & Omer R. Galle, 1994, Geographic Concentration, Migration, and Population Redistribution among the Elderly, In Linda G. Martin and Samuel H. Preston, Editors, Demography of Aging, Committee on Population, National Research Council.
 Coward, R.T., Lee, G.R. & Dwyer, J.W., 1993, The Family Relations of Rural Elders, In C.N. Bull (Ed.), Aging in Rural America, PP. 216-231, Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
 Crimmins, Eileen, M. & Dominique Ingegneri, 1990, Interaction and Living Arrangement of Older Parents and Their Children: Past Trends, Present Determinants, Future Implications, Research on Ageing, Vol. 12, No. 1, PP. 3-35.
 Keating, Norah & Judith Philips, 2008, A Critical Human Ecology Perspective on Rural ageing, In Keating, Norah, Rural Aging, A good place to grow old? London: The Policy Press.
 Knodel, John & Chanpen Saengtienchai, 2005, Rural Parents with Urban Children: Social and Economic Implications of Migration on the Rural Elderly in Thailand, Population Studies Center, University of Michigan, Institute for Social Research, Population Studies Center Report.
 Kohli, Martin, Harald Kunemund & Jorg Ludicke, 2005, Family Structure, Proximity and Contact.
 Landernan, R., George, L., Campbell, R. & Blazer, D., 1989, Alternative Models of the Stress Buffering Hypothesis, American Journal of Community Psychology, 17, PP. 625-642.
 Laws, G., 1997, Spatiality and Age Relations, in A. Jamieson, S. Harper & C. Victor (eds), Critical Approaches to Ageing and Later Life, Maidenhead: Open University Press, PP. 90-100.
 Mattson, Marifran & Jenifer Gibb Hall, 2011, Health as Communication Nexus, Kendall Hunt Publishing Co. 
 Norbeck, J.S., 1984, The Norbeck Social Support Questionnaire, Birth Dafect Orig Artic Ser, 20(5), PP. 45-57.
 Sarason, Irwin G. & Barbara R., 1985, Social Support: Theory, Research and Applications, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Published in Cooperation with NATO Scientific Affairs Division.
 [A1]در متن نیست