تفکیک سطوح پیشایندهای رفتاری بر مبنای شاخص‌های پایداری و خصوصیات فردی کشاورزان (موردمطالعه: شهرستان قلعه گنج)

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 استادیار، گروه احیاء و بهره برداری از مناطق خشک، دانشکده منابع طبیعی، مجتمع آموزش عالی سراوان، سیستان و بلوچستان، ایران.

2 استاد، گروه مهندسی احیاء مناطق خشک و کوهستانی، دانشکده منابع طبیعی، دانشگاه تهران، کرج، ایران.

3 استادیار، گروه ترویج و آموزش کشاورزی، دانشکده علوم و مهندسی کشاورزی، دانشگاه تهران،کرج، ایران.

4 استاد، گروه دانش سیستم‌های محیط زیست، دانشگاه زوریخ، سوئیس.

چکیده

یکی از چالش‌های پایداری، شکاف بین دستورالعمل‌های پایداری و تصمیم‌گیری همراه با عمل از سوی جوامع هدف است. رفتار کشاورزان نیز به‌عنوان عامل تصمیم‌گیرنده از عوامل اثرگذار بر آینده پایداری است. دراین‌بین رویکردهای فرارشته‌ای همچون نظام‌های انسان- محیط‌زیست جهت مدیریت پایدار و رفع چالش‌های پایداری مؤثر هستند. بدین منظور این تحقیق با هدف اصلی بررسی رفتار پایدار بهره‌برداران کشاورزی و به قصد سنجش توانایی تفکیک رفتار کشاورزان بر اساس شاخص‌های پایداری در قالب پنج سرمایه و همچنین بر اساس خصوصیات فردی کشاورزان انجام پذیرفته است. جامعه آماری پژوهش متشکل از 5024 بهره-بردار کشاورزی شهرستان قلعه‌گنج بوده که ازاین‌بین به روش نمونه‌گیری طبقه‌ای با انتساب متناسب به شمار 389 نفر به‌عنوان نمونه انتخاب و دو پیشایند رفتاری سودمندی و سازگاری درک‌شده موردسنجش قرار گرفته‌اند. ابزار پژوهش پرسش‌نامه‌ای بود که روایی و پایایی آن توسط ضریب آلفای کرونباخ و تحلیل عاملی تأییدی با استفاده از نرم‌افزار Lisrel 8.80 موردبررسی قرار گرفت. روش آماری جهت تفکیک و پیش‌بینی وضعیت پیشایندهای رفتاری رگرسیون لجستیک دو جمله‌ای بر پایه نرم‌افزار SPSS 25 بوده است. نتیجه کلی تحقیق گویای آن است که شاخص‌های پایداری فیزیکی متغیری مهم در پیش‌بینی رفتار بهره‌برداران است. همچنین مشخص شد محل سکونت نیز در پیش‌بینی رفتار مؤثر است. در رابطه با مؤلفه سودمندی درک‌شده از سوی افراد شاخص‌های انسانی و نوع منبع آب نیز معنی‌دار هستند درحالی‌که برای مؤلفه سازگاری درک‌شده از سوی افراد شاخص‌های اجتماعی و نوع فعالیت کشاورزی تأثیر پیش‌بینی کننده معنی‌دارتری دارند. 

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Levels of Separation of Behavioral Antecedents Based on Sustainability Indicators and Farmers Individual Characteristics (Case Study: Ghalehgang County)

نویسندگان [English]

  • Fatemeh Narmashiri 1
  • Mehdi Ghorbani 2
  • GholamReza Zehtabian 2
  • Hosein Azarnivand 2
  • Amir Alambeigi 3
  • Roland W Scholz 4
1 Assistant Professor, Department of Reclamation of Arid Regions, Faculty of Natural Resources, Higher Education Complex of Saravan, Sistan & Baluchestan, Iran.
2 Professor, Department of Reclamation of Arid and Mountainous Regions, Faculty of Natural Resources, University of Tehran, Karaj, Iran.
3 Assistant Professor, Department of Agricultural Extension & Education, Faculty of Agricultural Science & Engineering, University of Tehran, Karaj, Iran.
4 Professor, Department of Environmental Systems Sciences, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
چکیده [English]

One of the sustainability challenges is the gap between sustainability guidelines and action-based decision-making by the target communities. Farmers' behavior as a decision-maker is also a factor influencing the future of sustainability. Interdisciplinary approaches such as human-environmental systems are effective for sustainable management and solving the challenges of sustainability. For this purpose, this study was conducted to investigate the sustainable behavior of agricultural stakeholders and evaluate the separation of behavioral antecedent levels of capability based on sustainability indicators in the form of five capitals and individual characteristics of farmers. The statistical population of this study included 5024 agricultural stakeholders of Ghalehgang County, of which 389 people were selected as a sample by stratified sampling method with appropriate proportion, and two behavioral antecedents of perceived usefulness and perceived compatibility were measured. The research tool was a questionnaire and its validity and reliability were assessed by Cronbach's alpha coefficient and confirmatory factor analysis using Lisrel 8.80 software. The statistical method for distinguishing and predicting the status of behavioral antecedents was binary logistic regression using SPSS 25 software. The overall result of the research shows that physical stability indicators are an important variable in predicting the behavior of users. It also turned out that the residence location is effective in predicting behavior. Regarding the individuals' perceived usefulness component, human indicators and the type of water source are significant, while for the perceived compatibility component, social indicators and the type of agricultural activity have a more significant predictive effect.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Sustainability
  • Antecedents
  • Human-Environmental Systems
  • Sustainability of agriculture
  • Ghalehgang

مراجع

Adebayo, O., Grace, A., Olayinka, Y., Ibrahim, A., Felicia, O. (2018). Prospects and problems of using Jatropha cake as organic fertiliser among crop farmers in Oyo State, Nigeria. International Journal of Agricultural Resources, Governance and Ecology, 14(1), 80–90. 
Anabestani, A.A., Salehi. T. (2010). Assessing the Sustainability of Rural Settlements in Alluvial Fans - Case Study: Joven Plain (Persian). Geography and Environmental Studies, 3, 85-94.
Chau, P.Y.K., Hu, P.J. (2002). Examining a model of information technology acceptance by individual professionals: An exploratory study. Journal of Management Information Systems, 18(4), 191–229. 
David, W., Ardiansyah, A. (2018). Perceptions of young consumers toward organic food in Indonesia. International Journal of Agricultural Resources, Governance and Ecology, 13(4), 315–324. 
Edwards-Jones, G. (2006). Modelling farmer decision-making: concepts, progress and challenges. Animal Science 82, 783–790.
Eshaghi, R., Hedjazi, Y., Alambeigi, A. (2015).  Breakdown Surfaces Environmental Concerns Rural on Social Variables: Application of Two-Dimensional Logistic Model (Persian). Journal of Rural Research, 6(2), 233-252
FAO & WFP. (2019). The state of food security and nutrition in the world 2019: safeguarding against economic slowdowns and downturns. https://www.wfp.org/publications/ 2019-state-food-security-and-nutrition-world-sofi-safeguarding-against-economic.
FAO. (1998). Sustainable Agriculture Production: Implications for International Agriculture Research, Rome.
FAO. (2015). FAO and the 17 Sustainable Development Goals. Available from http://www.fao.org/3/a-i4997e.pdf. (Accessed 12 January 2019).
Ghorbani, M. (2011).Environment Literacy in Science and Society from Knowledeg to Decisions. University of Tehran Press.
Giddings, B., Hopwood, B., O’Brien, G. (2002). Environment, Economy and Society: Fitting them together into sustainable development. Sustainable Development, 10, 187–196.
Halima, B., Chamhuri Siwar, A.S.A., Ferdous, A., Choy, A., Ishak, S., Alam, L. (2018). Enhancing sustainability amongst oil palm smallholders in Malaysia. International Journal of Agricultural Resources, Governance and Ecology, 14(1), 62–79. 
Hukkinen, J.I. (2014). Model of the social-ecological system depends on model of the mind: contrasting information-processing and embodied views of cognition. Ecol. Econ. 99, 100–109. 
Kumari, R. (2018). Making rapid strides: Sources and drivers of agricultural growth in Uttar Pradesh, India. International Journal of Agricultural Resources, Governance and Ecology, 14(1), p 20-44. 
Levine, J., Chan, K.M.A., Satterfield, T. (2015). From rational actor to efficient complexity manager: exorcising the ghost of Homo economic us with a unified synthesis of cognition research. Ecol. Econ. 114, 22–32. 
McGregor, M.J., Rola-Rubzen, M.F., Murray-Prior, R. (2001). Micro and macro-level approaches to modelling decision making. Agricultural Systems 69, 63–83.
Munoz-Leiva, F., Hernández-Méndez, J., Sánchez-Fernández, J. (2012). Generalising user behaviour in online travel sites throughthe Travel 2.0 website acceptance model. Online InformationReview, 36(6), 879-902.
Ohlmer, B., Olson, K., Brehmer, B. (1998). Understanding farmers' decision making processes and improving managerial assistance. Agricultural Economics 18, 273–290.
Paul, I., Okey, N., Udeh, A. (2018). Agricultural products fumigation poses risk of food contamination in Abakaliki, southeastern Nigeria. International Journal of Agricultural, Resources Governance and Ecology, 14(1), 91–103. 
Pourzand, F., Bakhshoudeh, M. (2012). Evaluating agricultural sustainability of Fars province with compromise programming approach (persian). Journal of Agricultural Economics Research, 4(13), 1-26.
Ranjbaran, M., Mehdinejad Darzi, J., Karimi, B., Jamhiri, M. (2021). Explaining the components of ecological landscape based on environmental perception patterns (Case study: Bandar Kong) (Persian).Quarterly of New Attitudes in Human Geography, 13(2), 598-610
Rogers, E.M. (2003). Diffusion of Innovations. (5th Ed.). New York, NY: The Free Press.
Salehi, S., Ebrahimkhani F. (2019). The relationship between social capital and behavior of farmers in protecting groundwater (Case study: Qazvin plain) (Persian). Rural Development Strategies, 5(3), 363-382.
Schluter, M., Baeza, A., Dressler, G., Frank, K., Groeneveld, J., Jager, W., Janssen, M.A., McAllister, R.R.J., Müller, B., Orach, K., Schwarz, N., Wijermans, N. (2017). A framework for mapping and comparing behavioural theories in models of social-ecological systems, Ecological Economics, Volume 131, Pages 21-35, ISSN 0921-8009.
Scholz, R.W. (2011). Environmental Literacy in Science and Society: From Knowledge to Decisions. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
Stern, P.C. (1993). A second environmental science: human-environment interactions. Science, vol 260. 25 June.
Stern, P.C. (2000). Toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behavior. Journal of Social. Issues, 56(3), 407–24.
Syan. A.S., Kumar. V., Sandhu. V., Hundal. B.S. (2019). Empirical Analysis of Farmers Intention to Adopt Sustainable Agricultural Practices. Asia-Pacific Journal of Management Research and Innovation. 15(1–2) 39–52. 
Sydorovych. O., Wossink. A. (2008). The meaning of agricultural sustainability: evidence from a conjoint choice survey. Agric. Syst. 98 (1), 10–20.
Talukder, B., Blay-Palmer, A., vanLoon, G.W., Hipel, W.K. (2020). Towards complexity of agricultural sustainability assessment: Main issues and concerns. Environmental and Sustainability Indicators 6: 100038.
Teklewold, H., Kassie, M., Shiferaw, B. (2013). Adoption of multiple sustainable agricultural practices in rural Ethiopia. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 64(3), 59–623.
Tey, Y.S., Li, E., Bruwer, J., Abdullah, A.M., Brindal, M., Radam, A., Ismail, M.M., Darham, S. (2014). The relative importance of factors influencing the adoption of sustainable agricultural practices: A factor approach for Malaysian vegetable farmers. Sustainability Science, 9(1), 17–29.
UN, (1992). Convention on Biological Diversity. United Nations. Available from. http://www.cbd.int/doc/legal/cbd-en.pdf.
Vahedi, M., hoseini, S.M., hoseini, S.J.F., Mirdamadi, S.M. (2009). An Investigating of the Viewpoints of Nazarabad County Farmers about Subjective Indices of Sustainable Agriculture Farm Household Level (Persian). Iranian Journal of Agricultural Economics and Development Research, 40(2), 123-133.
Webster, P. (1999). The challenge of sustainability at the farm level: presidential address. Journal of Agricultural Economics 50 (3), 371–387.
White, B. (2015) World development report 2015: mind, society, and behavior, by the World Bank Group, Canadian Journal of Development Studies / Revue canadienne d'études du développement, 36:4, 581-584. 
پژوهش های روستائی
دوره 13، شماره 3
آذر 1401
صفحه 408-419

فایل ها

سابقه مقاله

  • تاریخ دریافت: 12 شهریور 1400
  • تاریخ بازنگری: 11 آذر 1400
  • تاریخ پذیرش: 13 آذر 1400

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار